Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 730-737

  Khan, Emad A ^a,b   Tyndall, Donald A ^b   Caplan, Daniel ^b  

^a KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENTAL CARIES; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOUTH HYGIENE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; RADIOGRAPHY; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TOOTH EXTRACTION; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER CURVE; BICUSPID; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; X-RAY FILM; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 9944233968     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. H.R. Raper A new kind of x-ray examination for preventive dentistry Int J Orthod Oral Surg XI 1925 76 86
2. A. Moystad, D.B. Svanaes, S. Risnes, T.A. Larheim, and H.G. Grondahl Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental x-ray film Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25 1996 202 206
3. S.C. White, and D.C. Yoon Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26 1997 32 38
4. B.C. Kang, A.G. Farman, W.C. Scarfe, and L.J. Goldsmith Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film Caries Res 30 1996 156 162
5. R.W. Beideman, O.N. Johnson, and R.W. Alcox A study to develop a rating system and evaluate dental radiographs submitted to a third party carrier J Am Dent Assoc 93 1976 1010 1013
6. P.S. Casamassimo Radiographic considerations for special patients - modifications, adjuncts, and alternatives Ped Dent 3 1981 448 454
7. M. Ahlqwist, A. Halling, and L. Hollender Rotational panoramic radiography in epidemiological studies of dental health. Comparison between panoramic radiographs and intraoral full mouth surveys Swed Dent J 10 1986 73 84
8. S. Balis Error and accuracy rates of panoramic radiography as a screening method for mass surveying of children J Public Health Dent 41 1981 220 234
9. T.L. Clifton, D.A. Tyndall, and J.B. Ludlow Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 1998 193 198
10. E.E. Davies, F. Meister Jr., and T.J. Lommel Panoramic versus periapical surveys. A comparison of findings on freshman dental students Dent Radiogr Photogr 50 1977 41 47
11. D.J. Flint, E. Paunovich, W.S. Moore, D.T. Wofford, and C.B. Hermesch A diagnostic comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographs Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85 1998 731 735
12. P.S. Horton, F.H. Sippy, P.E. Kerber, and C.L. Paule Analysis of interpretations of full-mouth and panoramic surveys Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 44 1977 468 475
13. C.E. Hurlburt, and A.H. Wuehrmann Comparison of interproximal carious lesion detection in panoramic and standard intraoral radiography J Am Dent Assoc 93 1976 1154 1158
14. M.L. Kantor, S.J. Zeichner, R.W. Valachovic, and A.B. Reiskin Efficacy of dental radiographic practices: options for image receptors, examination selection, and patient selection J Am Dent Assoc 119 1989 259 268
15. B. Molander, M. Ahlqwist, H.G. Grondahl, and L. Hollender Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology Dentomaxillofac Radiol 22 1993 28 32
16. A.H. Muhammed, L.R. Manson-Hing, and B. Ala A comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographic surveys in evaluating a dental clinic population Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 54 1982 108 117
17. T. Oba, and H. Katayama Comparison of orthopantomography with conventional periapical dental radiography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 34 1972 524 530
18. A. Ramesh, D.A. Tyndall, and J.B. Ludlow Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30 2001 98 100
19. V.E. Rushton, and K. Horner The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice J Dent 24 1996 185 201
20. W.C. Scarfe, R.P. Langlais, P. Nummikoski, S.B. Dove, W.D. McDavid, and S.T. Deahl Clinical comparison of two panoramic modalities and posterior bite-wing radiography in the detection of proximal dental caries Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 77 1994 195 207
21. R.G. Stephens, S.L. Kogon, J.A. Reid, and A. Ruprecht A comparison of panorex and intraoral surveys for routine dental radiography Dent J 43 1977 281 286
22. J.L. Stewart, and L.F. Bieser Panoramic roentgenograms compared with conventional intraoral roentgenograms Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 26 1968 39 42
23. C.W. Douglass, R.W. Valachovic, A. Wijesinha, H.H. Chauncey, K.K. Kapur, and B.J. McNeil Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62 1986 330 339
24. R.W. Valachovic, C.W. Douglass, A.B. Reiskin, H.H. Chauncey, and B.J. McNeil The use of panoramic radiography in the evaluation of asymptomatic adult dental patients Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 61 1986 289 296
25. E. Sonnabend, and A. Ring [Significance of panoramic demonstration in tooth maintenance and periodontics] Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 27 1972 965 969 German
26. H.G. Grondahl, and A. Ekestubbe [Dental and maxillofacial radiology. The Scanora technique - a breakthrough] Tandlakartidningen 83 1991 624 6-33. Swedish
27. J.B. Ludlow, M. Abreu Jr., and A. Mol Performance of a new F-speed film for caries detection Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30 2001 110 113
28. K.H. Thunthy, and E.J. Ireland A comparison of the visibility of caries on Kodak F-speed (insight) and D-speed (Ultra-speed) films LDA J 60 2001 31 32
29. M.K. Nair, and U.P. Nair An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis Caries Res 35 2001 354 359
30. H. Hintze, A. Wenzel, and C. Jones In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions Caries Res 28 1994 363 367
31. D.A. Tyndall, J.B. Ludlow, E. Platin, and M. Nair A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85 1998 113 118
32. C.E. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis Semin Nucl Med 8 1978 283 298
33. D.K. Benn Radiographic caries diagnosis and monitoring Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23 1994 69 72
34. L.V. Arnold The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part I. The influence of exposure conditions Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64 1987 221 231
35. B. Svenson, U. Welander, G. Anneroth, and B. Soderfeldt Exposure parameters and their effects on diagnostic accuracy Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78 1994 544 550
36. S.B. Hulley, and S.R. Cummings Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach 1988 Williams & Wilkins Baltimore p. xi, 247
37. B.L. Chadwick, and P.H. Dummer Factors affecting the diagnostic quality of bitewing radiographs: a review Br Dent J 184 1998 80 84 discussion 77
38. L.V. Arnold The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part II. The influence of viewing conditions Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64 1987 232 240
39. D.B. Svanaes, A. Moystad, S. Risnes, T.A. Larheim, and H.G. Grondahl Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 82 1996 94 100
40. J.B. Ludlow, and M. Abreu Jr. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection Dentomaxillofac Radiol 28 1999 26 30
41. M. Abreu Jr., D.A. Tyndall, and J.B. Ludlow Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88 1999 234 238
42. M. Analoui, and K. Buckwalter Digital radiographic image archival, retrieval, and management Dent Clin North Am 44 2000 339 358 vi-vii
43. A. Backstrom, U. Welander, W.D. McDavid, G. Tronje, and G.C. Sanderink The effect of system parameters on resolution in rotational panoramic radiography. A mathematical analysis Dentomaxillofac Radiol 18 1989 169 176
44. H.G. Klinger, T. Redelberger, and W. Wiedemann [Digital image processing in the radiographic diagnosis of caries] Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 44 1989 181 183 German
45. H.G. Klinger, R. Reinhard, P. Dunninger, and W. Wiedemann [Enhancement of bite-wing radiographs by digital image processing] Z Stomatol 86 1989 1 11 German
46. A. Wenzel, O. Fejerskov, E. Kidd, S. Joyston-Bechal, and A. Groeneveld Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs Caries Res 24 1990 327 333
47. A. Wenzel, and O. Fejerskov Validity of diagnosis of questionable caries lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars Caries Res 26 1992 188 194
48. M.K. Shrout, C.M. Russell, B.J. Potter, B.J. Powell, and C.F. Hildebolt Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis? J Am Dent Assoc 127 1996 469 473
49. A. Wenzel, H. Hintze, L. Mikkelsen, and F. Mouyen Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72 1991 621 626
50. S.B. Dove, and W.D. McDavid A comparison of conventional intra-oral radiography and computer imaging techniques for the detection of proximal surface dental caries Dentomaxillofac Radiol 21 1992 127 134
51. M. Ohki, T. Okano, and T. Nakamura Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23 1994 77 82
52. A. Wenzel Digital imaging for dental caries Dent Clin North Am 44 2000 319 338 vi
53. U. Helfenstein, and M. Steiner The use of logistic discrimination and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis in dentistry Community Dent Health 11 1994 142 146
54. E.H. Verdonschot, A. Wenzel, and E.M. Bronkhorst Applicability of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis on discrete caries depth ratings Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 21 1993 269 272
55. J.A. Hanley Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 29 1989 307 335