Mechanical Defects in Dental Enamel vs. Natural Dental Caries: Observer Differentiation Using Ektaspeed Plus Film

Caries Research

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 156-162

  Kang, B C ^a   Farman, A G ^a   Scarfe, W C ^a   Goldsmith, L J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bitewing radiography; Dental caries; Dental radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; DENTIST; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROBABILITY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; DENTISTS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODDS RATIO; PROBABILITY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0030331113     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000262153     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arends J, Schuthof J, Jongebloed WG: Lesion depth and microhardness indentations on artificial white spot lesions. Caries Res 1980:14:190-195.
2. Arnold LV: The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part I. The influence of exposure conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987a;64:221-231.
3. Arnold LV: The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part II. The influence of viewing conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987b;64:232-240.
4. Benn DK: Radiographic caries diagnosis and monitoring. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994:23:69-72.
5. Benn DK. Watson TF: Correlation between film position. bite-wing shadows, clinical pitfalls, and the histologic size of approximal lesions. Quintessence Int 1989;20:131-141.
6. Bille J, Thylstrup A: Radiographic diagnosis and clinical tissue changes in relation to treatment of approximal carious lesions. Caries Res 1982; 16:1 6.
7. ten Bosch JJ. Noordmans J. Arnold LV, Borsboom PCF: Effect of a decrease of interproximal overexposure of bitewing radiographs on the diagnosis of approximal caries. Caries Res 1989:23: 328-333.
8. Douglas CW, Valachovic RW, Wijesinha A, Chaun-eey HH, Kapur KK, McNeil BJ: Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986;62:330-339.
9. Goaz PW, White SC: Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. St Louis, Mosby, 1994, pp306-326.
10. Goshima T, Goshima Y: Radiographic detection of recurrent carious lesions associated with composite restorations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;70:236-239.
11. Gratt BM, White SC, Bauer JG: A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;65:483-489.
12. Grôndahl H-G, Grondahl K. Okano T, Webber RL: Statistical contrast enhancement of subtraction images for radiographic caries diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53:219-223.
13. Halse A, Espelid I. Tveit AB. White SC: Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;77:177-182.
14. Halse A. White SC, Espelid I, Tveit AB: Visualization of stannous fluoride treatment of carious lesions by subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:378-381.
15. Haugejorden O. Slack GL: A study of intra-examiner error associated with recording of radio-graphic caries at different diagnostic levels. Acta Odontol Scand 1975;33:169-181.
16. Heaven TJ. Firestone AR. Feagin FF: Computer-based image analysis of natural approximal caries on radiographic films. J Dent Res 1992; 71(specialissue):846-849.
17. Heaven TJ. Weems RA, Firestone AR: The use of a computer-based image analysis program for the diagnosis of approximal caries from bitewing radiographs. Caries Res 1994;28:55-58.
18. Hintzc H. Wenzel A, Jones C: In vitro comparison of D-and E-speed film radiography, RVG. and Visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 1994:28:363-367.
19. Jaffe CC: Medical imaging, vision and visual psychophysics. Med Radiogr Photo 1984;60:1-48.
20. Kleier DJ, Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM: A comparison of Ultraspeed and Ektaspccd dental X-ray film: In vitro study of the radiographic appearance of interproximal lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987:63:381-385.
21. Kleinbaum DG: Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text, New York, Springer, 1994.
22. Langlais RP. Langland OE, Nortjé CJ: Diagnostic imaging of the jaws. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1995. pp 64-l80.
23. Newbrun E: Cariology, ed. 3. Chicago, Quintessence, 1989. pp 250-255.
24. Norman GR, Streiner DL: Statistics Toronto, Decker. 1989.
25. Nummikoski PV, Martinez TS, Matteson SR, McDavid WD. Dove SB: Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:59-64.
26. Ohki M, Okano T, Nakamura T: Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized intraoral radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23:77-82.
27. Okano T, Grôndahl H-G, Grôndahl K, Webber RL: Effect of quantum noise on the detection of incipient proximal caries. Oral Surg 1982:53:212-218.
28. Pitts NB: Detection and measurement of approximal radioluccncics by computer-aided image analysis. Oral Surg 1984;58:358-366.
29. Pitts NB, Rimmcr PA: An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth. Caries Res 1992;26: 146-152.
30. Razmus TF: Caries, periodontal disease, and periapical changes. Dent Clin North Am 1994;38: 13-31.
31. Silverstone LM: The surface zone in caries and in caries-like lesions produced in vitro. Br Dent J 1968;125:145-157.
32. Silverstone LM: Relationship of the macroscopic, histological, and radiographic appearance of interproximal lesions in human teeth: In vitro study using artificial caries technique. Pcdiatr Dent 1982;3(specialissue):414-422.
33. van der Stelt PF. Ruttiman UE. Webber RL. Hecm-stra P: In vitro study into the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the detection of artificial caries defects on bitewing radiographs. Caries Res 1989;23:334-341.
34. Tate WH, White RR: Disinfection of human teeth for educational purposes. J Dent Edite 1991:55: 583-585.
35. van der Weijden GA. Timmerman MF. Saxton CA. Russell JI, Huntington E. van der Velden U: In-tra-/inter-examiner reproducibility study of gingival bleeding. J Periodont Res 1994:29: 236-241.
36. de Vries HCB, Ruiken HMHM, König KG. van't Hof V: Radiographic versus clinical diagnosis of approximal carious lesions. Caries Res 1990; 24:364-370.
37. Wenzel A, Hintzc H. Mikkelscn L. Mouyen F: Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in non-cavitated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991:72:621-626.
38. Wenzel A, Pitts N. Verdonschot EH, Kalsbcek H: Developments in radiographic caries diagnosis. J Dent 1993:21:131-140.
39. Wenzel A. Verdonschot EH: Some considerations in the evaluation of diagnostic tests in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994:23:179-182.
40. Zamir T, Fisher D, Fishel D. Sharav Y: A longitudinal radiographic study of the rate of spread of human approximal dental caries. Arch Oral Biol 1976:21:523-526.