An in-vitro Evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus Film with a CMOS Detector for Natural Proximal Caries: ROC Analysis

Caries Research

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 354-359

  Nair, M K ^a   Nair, U P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Caries detection; Digital sensor; Insight film; Receiver operating characteristic

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; DISEASE COURSE; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MOLAR TOOTH; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AREA UNDER CURVE; BICUSPID; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; DISEASE PROGRESSION; HUMANS; MOLAR; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0035463180     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000047474     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abreu M Jr, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Ludlow JB, Phillips C: Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28: 152-157.
2. Analoui M, Stookey GK: Direct digital radiography for caries detection and analysis. Monogr Oral Sci 2000;17:1-19.
3. Borg E, Gröndahl HG: Dynamic range of film and digital system for image acquisition in intraoral radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:104-105.
4. Firestone AR, Sema D, Heaven TJ, Weems RA: The effect of a knowledge-based, image analysis and clinical decision support system on observer performance in the diagnosis of approximal caries from radiographic images. Caries Res 1998;32:127-34.
5. Fossum ER: Active pixel sensors: Are CCDs dinosaurs? Int Soc Opt Eng (SPIE) 1993;1900: 2-14.
6. Fossum ER: CMOS evolution: The digital camera-on-a-chip gets active. Adv Imag 1997;74:13-14.
7. Geist JR, Brand JW, Pink FE: Sensitometric evaluation of Eastman Kodak Speed Group E and F radiographic films (abstr). 51st Annu Session. Am Acad Oral Maxillofac Radiol, Nashville. 2000, p 36.
8. Jessee SA, Makins SR, Bretz WA: Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds. Gen Dent 1999;47:88-93.
9. Lundis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1997;33:159-174.
10. Ludlow JB, Ahreu M Jr, Mol A: Performance of a new F-speed film for curies detection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:110-113.
11. Lundeen RC, McDavid WD, Barnell GM: Proximal surface caries detection with direct exposure and rare-earth screen/film imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988;66:734-745.
12. Metz CE: Basic principles of ROC Analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-298.
13. Møystad A, Svanaes DB, Larheim TA, Grondahl H-G: Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: An in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:255-259.
14. Nair MK, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, May K, Ye F: The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27: 80-84.
15. Naitoh M, Yuasa H, Toyama M, Shiojima M, Nakamura M, Ushida M, Iida H, Hayashi M, Ariji E: Observer agreement in the detection of proximal caries with direct digital intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:107-112.
16. Pabla T, Abreu M Jr, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA: Comparison of scanning resolutions of Denoptix system for proximal caries detection (abstr) 51st Annu Session. Am Acad Oral Maxillofac Radiol, Nashville, 2000, p 56.
17. Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF: Radiographic detection of approximal caries: A comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:312-318.
18. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M: A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:113-118.
19. Uprichard KK, Potter BJ, Russell CM, Schaler TE, Adair S, Weller RN: Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:9-15.
20. Versteeg CH, Sanderink CH, van der Stelt PF: Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1997;25:215-224.
21. Wenzel A: Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:3-11.
22. Wenzel A: Digital imaging for dental caries. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:319-338.
23. Wenzel A, Anthonisen PN, Juul MB: Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: A comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography. Caries Res 2000;34:214-218.
24. Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Borg E, Crondahl HG: Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;81:351-355.
25. Wenzel A, Hintze H: Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:182-185.
26. White SC, Yoon DC: Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:32-38.
27. Yamaki N, Einbender H, Goren AD, Friedman SJ: Dose reduction using class F film (abstr) 51st Annu Session, Am Acad Oral Maxillofac Radiol, Nashville, 2000, p 38.