Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 572-577

  Knapp, Joshua M ^a   Loomis, Jack M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE INVARIANCE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAYS (HMD); LOCOMOTER RESPONSE;

BINOCULAR VISION; DISTANCE MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; OBJECT RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL METHODS; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 9744268246     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/1054746042545238     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Arthur, K. W. (2000). Effects of field of view on performance with head-mounted displays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
2. Bingham, G. P., & Pagano, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145-168.
3. Bingham, G. P., Bradley, A., Bailey, M., & Vinner, R. (2001). Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual en vironments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145-168.
4. Durgin, F. H., Fox, L. F., Lewis, J., & Walley, K. (2002, November). Perceptuomotor adaptation: More than meets the eye. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.
5. Ellis, S. R., & Menges, B. M. (1997). Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: Interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 452-460.
6. Fukusima, S. S., Loomis, J. M., & Da Silva, J. A. (1997). Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 86-100.
7. Kline, P. B., & Witmer, B. G. (1996). Distance perception in virtual environments: Effects of field of view and surface texture at near distances. Proceedings of the HFES 40th annual meeting, Philadelphia, 112-116.
8. Knapp, J. M. (1999). The visual perception of egocentric distance in virtual environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
9. Loomis, J. M., & Knapp, J. M. (2003). Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments (pp. 21-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Ooi, T. L., Wu, B., & He, Z. I. (2001). Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon. Nature, 414, 197-200.
11. Philbeck, J. W., & Loomis, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of visually perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 72-85.
12. Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., & Beall, A. C. (in press). Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distance in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
13. Watt, S. J., Bradshaw, M. F., & Rushton, S. K. (2000). Field of view affects reaching, not grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 411-416.
14. Willemsen, P., & Gooch, A. A. (2002). An experimental comparison of perceived egocentric distance in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments using direct walking tasks (Technical report UUCS-02-009). School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Available from http://www.cs.utah.edu/techreports/2002/pdf/UUCS-02-009.pdf
15. Witmer, B. G., & Kline, P. B. (1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 144-167.
16. Witmer, B. G., & Sadowski, W. J., Jr. (1998). Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors, 40, 478-488.