Judgments of the distance to nearby virtual objects: Interaction of viewing conditions and accommodative demand

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 452-460

  Ellis, Stephen R ^a   Menges, Brian M ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BIOENGINEERING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MONOCULAR VISION; NASA CENTER ARC; NASA DISCIPLINE SPACE HUMAN FACTORS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

NASA CENTER ARC; NASA DISCIPLINE SPACE HUMAN FACTORS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0031197002     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.452     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Azuma, R., & Bishop, G. (1994). Improving static and dynamic registration in an optical see-through HMD. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '94, Orlando, Fl.
2. Ciuffreda, K. J., & Kenyon, R. V. (1983). Accommodation and accommodative vergence in normals, amblyopes and strabismics. In C. M. Schor and K. J. Ciuffreda (Eds.), Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinic aspects. Boston, MA: Butterworths.
3. Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition, Vol. 5., Academic Press.
4. Ellis, S. R., Bucher, U. J., & Menges, B. M. (1995). The relationship of binocular convergence to error in the judged distance of virtual objects. Proceedings of the International Federation for Automatic Control, Boston, 297-301.
5. Fisher, S. K., & Ciuffreda, K. J. (1988). Accommodation and apparent distance. Perception, 17, 609-612.
6. Janin, A. L., Mizell, D. W., & Caudell, T. P. (1993). Calibration of head-mounted displays for augmented reality applications. Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium '93, Seattle. 246-255.
7. Owens, D. A., & Leibowitz, H. W. (1983). Perceptual and motor consequences of tonic vergence. In C. M. Schor & K. J. Ciuffreda (eds.), Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinic aspects. Boston, MA: Butterworths' 25-74.
8. Ritter, M. (1977). Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depth. Perception and Psychophysics, 22 (4) 400-407.
9. Rolland, J. P., Ariely, D., & Gibson, W. (1995). Towards quantifying depth and size perception in 3D virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 4 (1) 24-49.
10. Semlow, J. L., & Hung, G. K. (1983). The near response: Theories of control In C. M. Schor & K. J. Ciuffreda (Eds.), Vergence eye movements: Basic and clinic aspects. Boston, MA: Butterworths' 175-196.
11. Weintraub, D. J., & Ensing, M. (1992). Human factors issues in head-up display design: The book of HUD. Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio: Crew Systems Ergonomics Information Analysis Center (CSERIAC).
12. Zuber, B. (1965). Physiological control of eye movements in humans. Ph.D. thesis at MIT, Cambridge, MA.