Perspectors: Composable, reusable reasoning modules to construct an engineering view from other engineering views

Advanced Engineering Informatics

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 49-67

  Haymaker, John ^a   Kunz, John ^a   Suter, Ben ^a   Fischer, Martin ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Building information modeling; Collaborative design; Design automation; Geometric reasoning; Narratives; Organization models; Perspectives; Perspectors; Process models; Product models

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PROCESS CONTROL; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; DESIGN AUTOMATION; GEOMETRIC REASONING; NARRATIVES; ORGANIZATION MODELS; PERSPECTIVES; PROCESS MODELS; PRODUCT MODELS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 9344268866     PISSN: 14740346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2004.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abrahamson S, Wallace D, Senin N, Sferro P. Integrated design in a service marketplace. Comput-Aided Des 2000;32:97-107.
2. Akbas R. Geometry-based modeling and simulation of construction processes. Technical Report No. 72. Stanford, CA: Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University; 2004.
3. Akinci B, Fischer M, Levitt R, Carlson B. Formalization and automation of time-space conflict analysis. J Comput Civil Eng, ASCE; 2002.
4. Aouad G, Marir F, Child T, Brandon P, Kawooya A. Construction integrated databases: linking design, planning and estimating. Proceedings of the international conference on the rehabilitation and development of civil engineering infrastructures, American University of Beirut, June 1997 p. 51-60.
5. Agarwal M, Cagan J. A blend of different tastes: the language of coffee makers. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 1998;25(2):205-26.
6. Autodesk. Autodesk Revit. www.autodesk.com; 2003.
7. Bentley. Microstation Informa. www.microstation.com; 2003.
8. Bidarra R, Kranendonk N, Noort A, Bronsvoort W. A collaborative framework for integrated part and assembly modeling. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 2002;2(4):256-64.
9. Clayton M, Teicholz P, Fischer M, Kunz J. Virtual components consisting of form, function, and behavior. Automat Construct 1999;8: 351-67.
10. Dassault Inc. CATIA R7. www.catia.com; 2003.
11. Darwiche A, Levitt RE, Hayes-Roth B. OARPLAN: generating project plans in a blackboard system by reasoning about objects, actions, and resources. J Artif Intell Eng Des, Anal Manuf 1988;2(3): 169-81.
12. Date CJ, Darwen H. A guide to the SQL standard, 3rd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1993.
13. Dixon J, Poli C. Engineering design and design for manufacturing. MA: Field Stone Publishers; 1995.
14. Duarte JP. Democratized architecture: grammars and computers for Siza's mass housing. Proceedings of the international conference on enhancement of computational methods in engineering and science, Macau. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999.
15. Dym CL, Henchey RP, Gonick S. A knowledge-based system for automated architectural code checking. Comput-Aided Des 1988; 20(3):137-45.
16. Eastman C, Jeng T-S. A database supporting evolutionary product model development for design. Automat Construct 1999;8(3):305-23.
17. Engineous Software Inc. Federated intelligent product environment. http://www.engineous.com/product_FIPER.htm; 2004.
18. Fischer M. Automating constructability reasoning with a geometrical and topological project model. Comput Syst Eng 1993;4(2-3): 179-92.
19. Flemming U, Woodbury R. Software environment to support early phases in building design (seed): overview. J Archit Eng 1995;1:147-52.
20. Granlund Olof Oy. BSPro. www.bspro.net; 2003.
21. Hakim MM, Garrett Jr. JH. An object-centered approach for modeling engineering design products: combining description logic and object-oriented models. J AI Eng Des Manuf (AI EDAM) 1997;11:187-98.
22. Han CS, Law K, Kunz J. Computer models and methods for a disabled access analysis design environment. CIFE Technical Report No. 123. Stanford University; 2000.
23. Haymaker J, Ackermann E, Fischer M. Meaning mediating mechanism: a prototype for constructing and negotiating meaning in collaborative design. Sixth international conference on artificial intelligence in design. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. p. 691-715.
24. Haymaker J, Fischer M, Kunz J, Suter B. Engineering test cases to motivate the formalization of an AEC project model as a directed acyclic graph of views and dependencies. ITcon 2004;9:419-41. http://www.itcon.org/2004/30.
25. Haymaker J, Suter B, Fischer M, Kunz J. The Perspective approach: enabling engineers to construct and integrate geometric views and generate an evolving project model. Working Paper No. 081. Center For Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University; 2003.
26. IAI. Industry foundation classes, Version 2.X. International Alliance for Interoperability; 2003.
27. Kam C, Fischer M. Product model and 4D CAD - final report. Technical Report No. 143. Center For Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University; 2002.
28. Korman TM, Tatum CB. Development of a knowledge-based system to improve mechanical, electrical, and plumbing coordination. Technical Report No. 129. CIFE, Stanford University; 2001.
29. Lou K, Subramaniam J, Iyer N, Kalyanaraman Y, Prabhakar S, Ramani K. A reconfigurable, intelligent 3D engineering shape search system part II: database indexing, retrieval, and clustering. ASME DETC 2003 computers and information in engineering (CIE) conference, Chicago, Illinois; 2003.
30. Post N. Movie of job that defies description is worth more than a million words. Eng News Record 2002;248(13):24.
31. Post N. Monster wood ceiling crowns city of angels' music. Eng News Record 2003;251(6):30-3.
32. Staub-French S, Fischer M, Kunz J, Paulson B. A generic feature-driven activity-based cost estimation process. Adv Eng Inf 2002; 17(1):23-39.
33. Stiny G. Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 1980;7:343-51.
34. Shea K, Cagan J. The design of novel roof trusses with shape annealing: assessing the ability of a computational method in aiding structural designers with varying design intent. Des Stud 1999;20:3-23.
35. Shah J, Mäntyla M. Parametric and feature-based CAD/CAM. New York: Wiley; 1995.
36. Summers J, Bettig B, Shah J. The design exemplar: a new data structure for embodiment design automation. ASME J Mech Des 2004;126(3).
37. Talukdar S, Baerentzen L, Goce A, derSouza P. Asynchronous teams: cooperation schemes for autonomous agents. J Heurist 1998;4: 295-321.
38. Turk Z. Phenomenological foundations of conceptual product modeling in architecture. Eng Construct, Artif Intell Eng 2001; 15(2).
39. Tekla. XSteel. www.xsteel.com; 2003.