Virtual components consisting of form, function and behavior

Automation in construction

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 351-367

  Clayton, Mark J ^a   Teicholz, Paul ^b   Fischer, Martin ^c   Kunz, John ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING COMPONENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INTEROPERABILITY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

PRODUCT MODELING; VIRTUAL COMPONENTS;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 0033077516     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00082-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. R. Amor, J. Hosking, L. Groves, M. Donn, Design tool integration: model flexibility for the building profession, Proceedings of Building Systems Automation-Integration, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 1993.
2. J.A. Arnold, P. Teicholz, A study of the life cycle requirements for an information model of the components that are incorporated in process facilities, CIFE Technical Report Number 107, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1996.
3. M. Asimow, Introduction to Design, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962.
4. G. Augenbroe, Design systems in a computer integrated manufacturing (CIM) context, in: P. Brandon, M. Betts (Eds.), Integrated Construction Information, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995, pp. 194-212.
5. W.J.C. Bakkeren, F.P. Tolman, Integrated structural engineering: is product modelling the way to go?, in: D.R. Rehak (Ed.), Bridging the Generations, International Workshop on the Future Directions of Computer-Aided Engineering, Pittsburg, PA, 1994.
6. B.C. Björk, Basic structure of a proposed building product model, in: Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 21, No. 2, Butterworth, London, 1989, pp. 71-78.
7. M.J. Clayton, M.A. Fischer, P. Teicholz, J.C. Kunz, The charrette testing method for CAD research, in: R. Hershberger, M. Kihl (Eds.), Applied Research in Architecture and Planning, Vol. 2, Herberger Center for Design Excellence, Tucson, AZ, 1997.
8. M.J. Clayton, J.C. Kunz, M.A. Fischer, Rapid conceptual design evaluation using a virtual product model, in: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 9, No. 4, Elsevier, 1996, pp. 439-451.
9. M.J. Clayton, R. Fruchter, H. Krawinkler, P. Teicholz, Interpretation objects for multi-disciplinary design, in: J.S. Gero, F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Design, '94, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994.
10. M.J. Clayton, M.A. Fischer, J.C. Kunz, R. Fruchter, Behavior follows form follows function: a theory of design evaluation, in: Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 1, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1995, pp. 310-317.
11. G.S. Cooper, P. Brandon, Integrating points of view through information modeling, in: P. Brandon, M. Betts (Eds.), Integrated Construction Information, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995, pp. 251-261.
12. R.D. Coyne, M.A. Rosenman, A.D. Radford, M. Balachandran, J.S. Gero, Knowledge-Based Design Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA, 1990.
13. J.R. Dixon, Artificial intelligence and design: a mechanical engineering view, AAAI-86, Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan-Kaufman Publishers, Los Altos, CA, 1986.
14. C.M. Eastman, Modeling of Buildings: Evolution and concepts, in: Automation in Construction, Vol. 1, No. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 99-109.
15. C.M. Eastman, S.C. Chase, H.H. Assal, System architecture for computer integration of design and construction knowledge, in: Automation in Construction, Vol. 2, No. 2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 95-107.
16. H. El-Bibany, Architecture for human-computer design, management and coordination in a collaborative AEC environment, Technical Report Number 70, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford, CA, 1992.
17. J.S. Gero, Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design, AI Magazine 11 (4) 26-36, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, 1990.
18. Industry Alliance for Interoperability, Industry Foundation Classes, IFC Specifications, Vol. 1, End User Guide, Version 0.94, 1996.
19. J.C. Jones, The state-of-art in design methods, in: G. Broadbent, A. Ward (Eds.), Design Methods in Architecture, Lund Humphries Publishers, London, 1969, pp. 193-197.
20. B. Kuipers, Commonsense reasoning about causality: deriving behavior from structure, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 24, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 169-203.
21. G.P. Luth, H. Krawinkler, K. Law, Representation and reasoning for integrated structural design, CIFE Technical Report Number 55, Stanford, CA, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, 1991.
22. D.H. Phan, H.C. Howard, The primitive-composite (P-C) approach: a methodology for developing sharable object-oriented data representations for facility engineering integration, Technical Report Number 85A and 85B, Stanford, CA, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, 1993.
23. R.D. Rush (Ed.), The Building Systems Integration Handbook, Wiley, New York, 1986.
24. D. Schön, Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Josey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1987.
25. A. Watson, Product models and beyond, in: P. Brandon, M. Betts (Eds.), Integrated Construction Information, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995, pp. 159-172.