Interrelationships among inbreeding, herbivory, and disease on reproduction in a wild gourd

Ecology

Volumn 85, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 3023-3034

  Stephenson, Andrew G ^a   Leyshon, Bradley ^a   Travers, Steven E ^a,c   Hayes, C Nelson ^a   Winsor, James A ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cucurbita; Disease ecology; Herbivory; Inbreeding depression; Male function; Pathogen infection; Reproductive output; Resistance: Tolerance; Viral disease

Indexed keywords

DISEASE RESISTANCE; HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; REPRODUCTION; VIRAL DISEASE;

ANIMALIA; APHIDIDAE; CARICA PAPAYA; CITRULLUS COLOCYNTHIS; CITRULLUS LANATUS VAR. LANATUS; COLEOPTERA; CUCUMIS SATIVUS; CUCURBITA; CUCURBITA PEPO; CUCURBITA PEPO VAR. MELOPEPO; PEPO;

EID: 9244235556     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/04-0005     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Agrawal, A., and C. M. Lively. 2001. Parasites and the evolution of self-fertilization. Evolution 55:869-879.
2. Avila-Sakar, G., G. A. Krupnick, and A. G. Stephenson. 2001. Resource allocation to growth and reproduction in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana: effects of fruit removal. International Journal of Plant Science 162:1089-1095.
3. Avila-Sakar, G., L. L. Leist, and A. G. Stephenson. 2003a. Effects of the spatial pattern of leaf damage on growth and reproduction: nodes and branches. Journal of Ecology 91: 867-879.
4. Avila-Sakar, G., S. Simmers, and A. G. Stephenson. 2003b. The interrelationships among leaf damage, anther development, and pollen production in Cucurbits pepo spp. texana (Cucurbitaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:395-404.
5. Barrett, S. C. H., and C. G. Eckert. 1990. Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. Pages 229-254 in D. Kawano, editor. Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
6. Bazzaz, F. A. 1997. Allocation of resources in plants: state of the science and critical questions. Pages 1-38 in A. Bazzaz and J. Grace, editors. Plant resource allocation. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
7. Bergelson, J., and C. B. Purrington. 1996. Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. American Naturalist 148: 536-558.
8. Biere, A., and J. Antonovics. 1996. Sex specific costs of resistance to the fungal pathogen Ustilago violacea (Microbotryum violaceum) in Silene alba. Evolution 50:1098-1110.
9. Blancard, D., H. Lecoq, and M. Pitrat. 1994. A color atlas of cucurbit diseases: observation, identification and control. Halstead Press. New York, New York, USA.
10. Brewbaker, J. L., and B. H. Kwack. 1963. The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth, American Journal of Botany 50:859-865.
11. Burdon, J. J. 1987a. Diseases and plant population biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Burdon, J. J. 1987b. Phenotypic and genetic patterns of resistance to the pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi in populations of Glycine canescens. Oecologia 73:257-267.
13. Burdon, J. J., and S. R. Leather. 1990. Pests, pathogens and plant communities. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
14. Carlsson-Graner, U. 1997. Anther-smut disease in Silene dioica: variation in susceptibility among genotypes and populations, and patterns of disease within populations. Evolution 51:1416-1426.
15. Carr, D. E., and M. D. Eubanks. 2002. Inbreeding alters resistance to insect herbivory and host plant quality in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 56:22-30.
16. Carr, D. E., J. F. Murphy, and M. D. Eubanks. 2003. The susceptibility and response of inbred and outbred Mimulus guttatus to infection by Cucumber mosaic virus. Evolutionary Biology 17:85-103.
17. Chang, S. M., and M. D. Rausher. 1999. The role of inbreeding depression in maintaining the mixed mating system of the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 53:1366-1376.
18. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Evolution and Systematics 18:237-268.
19. Coley, P. D., and J. A. Barone. 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:305-335.
20. Crnokrak, P., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2002. Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-2358.
21. Decker-Walters, D. S. 1990. Evidence for multiple domestication of Cucurbits pepo. Pages 96-101 in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, editors. Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
22. Decker-Walters, D. S., J. E. Straub, S.-M. Chung, E. Nakata, and H. D. Quemada. 2002. Diversity in free-living populations of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Systematic Botany 27:19-28.
23. Delph, L. F., M. J. Jóhannsson, and A. G. Stephenson. 1997. How environmental factors affect pollen performance: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ecology 78:1632-1639.
24. Devadas, S. K., A. Enyedi, and R. Raina. 2002. The Arabidopsis hrl1 mutation reveals novel overlapping roles for salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling in cell death and defence against pathogens. Plant Journal 30:467-480.
25. Devlin, B., J. Clegg, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1992. The effect of flower production on male reproductive success in wild radish populations. Evolution 46:1030-1042.
26. Dudash, M. R., D. E. Carr, and C. B. Fenster. 1997. Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51:54-65.
27. Fenster, C. B., and M. R. Dudash. 1994. Genetic considerations for plant population restoration and conservation. Pages 34-62 in M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whalen, editors. Restoration of endangered species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Ferber, D. 1999. Genetically modified crops in the crosshairs. Science 286:1662-1665.
29. Freeman, D. C., E. D. McArthur, K. T. Harper, and A. C. Blauer. 1981. Influence of environment on the floral sex ratio of monoecious plants. Evolution 35:194-197.
30. Fritz, R. S., and E. L. Simms. 1992. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
31. Halitschke, R., K. Gase, D. Hui, D. D. Schmidt, and I. T. Baldwin. 2003. Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VI. Microarray analysis reveals that most herbivore-specific transcriptional changes are mediated by fatty acid-amino acid conjugates. Plant Physiology 131:1894-1902.
32. Hare, J. D., E. Elle, and N. M. van Dam. 2003. Costs of glandular trichomes in Datura wrightii: a three-year study. Evolution 57:793-805.
33. Havens, K., K. A. Preston, C. Richardson, and L. F. Delph. 1995. Nutrients affect allocation to male and female function in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 82:726-733.
34. Hayes, C. N., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. In press. Effects of inbreeding on the male and female functions of a wild gourd. Evolution.
35. Hudson, P. J., A. Rizzoli, B. T. Grenfell, H. Heesterbeek, and A. P. Dobson. 2002. The ecology of wildlife diseases. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
36. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
37. Jóhannsson, M. H., M. J. Gates, and A. G. Stephenson. 1998. Inbreeding depression affects pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11:579-588.
38. Karban, R., and I. T. Baldwin. 1997. Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
39. Keller, L. F., and D. M. Waller. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecology and Evolution 17:230-241.
40. Kennedy, G. G., and J. D. Barbour. 1992. Resistance variation in natural and managed systems. Pages 13-41 in R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms, editors. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
41. Kirkpatrick, K. J., and H. D. Wilson. 1988. Interspecific gene flow in Cucurbita: C. texana vs. C. pepo. American Journal of Botany 75:519-527.
42. Kondrashov, A. S., and D. Houle. 1994. Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings Royal Society of London, Series B 258:221-227.
43. Lau, T.-C., and A. G. Stephenson. 1993. Effects of soil nitrogen on pollen production, pollen grain size, and pollen performance in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 80:763-768.
44. Lira, R., T. C. Andres, and M. Nee. 1995. Cucurbita. Pages 1-115 in R. Lira, editor. Systematic and ecogeographic studies on crop genepools. Volume 9. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Mexico City, Mexico, and Rome, Italy.
45. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1977. Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43:177-216.
46. MacNab, A. A., A. F. Sherf, and J. K. Springer. 1994. Identifying diseases of vegetables. Pennsylvania College of Agricultural Sciences, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
47. Maleck, K., A. Levine, T Eulgem, A. Morgan, J. Schmid, K. A. Lawton, J. L. Dangl, and R. A. Dietrich. 2000. The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance. Nature Genetics 26:403-410.
48. Marquis, R. J. 1992. The selective impact of herbivores. Pages 301-325 in R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms, editors. Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
49. Martin, G. B., A. J. Bogdanove, and G. Sessa. 2003. Understanding the functions of plant disease resistance proteins. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54:23-61.
50. Matheson, A. C., T. L. White, and G. R. Powell. 1995. Effects of inbreeding on growth, stem form and rust resistance in Pinus elliottii. Silvae Genetica 44:37-46.
51. Mauricio, R. 1998. Costs of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. American Naturalist 151:20-28.
52. McDowell, J. M., and B. J. Woffenden. 2003. Plant disease resistance genes: recent insights and potential applications. Trends in Biotechnology 21:178-183.
53. McNaughton, S. J., D. A. Oesterheld, D. A. Frank, and K. J. Williams. 1989. Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory of terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 341:14-144.
54. Metcalf, R. L., and A. M. Rhodes. 1990. Coevolution of Cucurbitaceae and Luperini (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): basic and applied aspects. Pages 167-182 in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, editors. Biology and utilizaton of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
55. Mooney, H. A., and N. R. Chiariello. 1984. The study of plant function: the plant as a balanced system. Pages 305-323 in R. Dirzo and J. H. Sarukhán, editors. Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
56. Mutikainen, P., and L. F. Delph. 1996. Effects of herbivory on male reproductive success in plants. Oikos 75:353-358.
57. National Research Council. 2002. Environmental effects of transgenic plants: the scope and adequacy of regulation. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
58. Nunez-Farfan, J., R. A. Cabrales-Vargas, and R. Dirzo. 1996. Mating system consequences on resistance to herbivory and life history traits in Datura stramonium. American Journal of Botany 83:1041-1049.
59. Ouborg, N. J., A. Biere, and C. L. Mudde. 2000. Inbreeding effects on resistance and transmission-related traits in the Silene-Microbotryum pathosystem. Ecology 81: 520-531.
60. Quesada, M. R., K. Bollman, and A. G. Stephenson. 1995. Leaf damage decreases pollen production and hinders pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. Ecology 76:437-443.
61. Quesada, M. R., J. A. Winsor, and A. G. Stephenson. 1993. Effects of pollen competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous Cucurbit. American Naturalist 142:694-706.
62. Rausher, M. D., and S.-M. Chang. 1999. Stabilization of mixed-mating systems by differences in the magnitude of inbreeding depression for male and female fitness components. American Naturalist 153:242-248.
63. Rich, P. M., D. M. Ranken, and J. S. George. 1989. A manual for microcomputer image analysis. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.
64. Roach, D. A., and D. Wulff. 1987. Maternal effect in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 209-236.
65. Ryals, J. A., U. H. Neuenschwander, M. G. Willits, A. Molina, H.-Y. Steiner, and M. D. Hunt. 1996. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 8:1809-1819.
66. Saccheri, I., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius, and I. Hanski. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 292:491-494.
67. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS user's guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
68. Schenk, P. M., K. Kazan, I. Wilson, J. P. Anderson, T. Richmond, S. C. Somerville, and J. M. Manners. 2000. Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 97:1 1655-11660.
69. Sherf, A. F., and A. A. MacNab. 1986. Cucurbits. Pages 307-311 in A. F. Sherf and A. A. MacNab, editors. Vegetable diseases and their control. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
70. Simms, E. L., and J. Triplett. 1994. Costs and benefits of plant resistance to disease: resistance and tolerance. Evolution 48:1973-1985.
71. Stephenson, A. G. 1979. An evolutionary examination of the floral display of Catalpa speciosa (Bignoniaceae). Evolution 33:1200-1209.
72. Stephenson, A. G., C. N. Hayes, M. H. Jóhannsson, and J. A. Winsor. 2001. The performance of microgametophytes is affected by inbreeding depression and hybrid vigor in the sporophytic generation. Sexual Plant Reproduction 14: 77-83.
73. Stephenson, A. G., T.-C. Lau, M. Quesada, and J. A. Winsor. 1992. Factors that affect pollen performance. Pages 119-136 in R. Wyatt, editor. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
74. Stephenson, A. G., S. E. Travers, J. I. Mena-Ali, and J. A. Winsor. 2003. Pollen performance before and during the autotrophic-hetertrophic transition of pollen tube growth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 358:1009-1018.
75. Strauss, S. Y., and A. A. Agrawal. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:179-185.
76. Strauss, S. Y., J. K. Conner, and K. P. Lehtila. 2001. Effects of foliar herbivory by insects on the fitness of Raphanus raphanistrum: damage can increase male fitness. American Naturalist 158:496-504.
77. Strauss, S. Y., and R. Karban. 1994. The significance of outcrossing in an intimate plant-herbivore relationship. 1. Does outcrossing provide an escape from herbivores to the parent plant? Evolution 48:454-464.
78. Strauss, S. Y., J. A. Rudgers, J. A. Lau, and R. E. Irwin. 2002. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:278-285.
79. Strauss, S. Y., W. Watson, and M. T. Allen. 2003. Predictors of male and female tolerance to insect herbivory in Raphanus raphanistrum. Ecology 84:2074-2082.
80. Tallamy, D. W. 1985. Squash beetle feeding behavior: an adaptation against induced cucurbit defenses. Ecology 66: 1574-1579.
81. Tallamy, D. W., and V. A. Krischik. 1989. Variation and function of cucurbita in Curcurbita: an examination of current hypotheses. American Naturalist 133:766-786.
82. Tiffin, P., and M. D. Rausher. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. American Naturalist 154:700-716.
83. Travers, S. E. 1999. A comparison of pollen performance between plants in recently burned versus unburned environments. Ecology 80:2427-2434.
84. USDA [United States Department of Agriculture]. 1994. Environmental assessment for Upjohn Company/Asgrow Seed Company petition for determination of non-regulated status for ZW-20 squash. USDA, Washington, D.C., USA.
85. USDA [United States Department of Agriculture]. 1996. Environmental assessment for Upjohn Company/Asgrow Seed Company petition for determination of non-regulated status for CZW-3 squash. USDA, Washington, D.C., USA.
86. Uyenoyama, M., K. E. Holsinger, and D. M. Waller. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilisation. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 9:327-381.
87. Vogler, D. W., K. Filmore, and A. G. Stephenson. 1999. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes of Campanula rapunculoides L. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:483-494.
88. Weinig, C., J. R. Stinchcombe, and J. Schmitt. 2003. Evolutionary genetics of resistance and tolerance to natural herbivory in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 57:1270-1280.