Predictors of male and female tolerance to insect herbivory in Raphanus raphanistrum

Ecology

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 2074-2082

  Strauss, Sharon Y ^a   Watson, Wendy ^a   Allen, Mitchell T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Compensation; Female fitness; Glucosinolates; Herbivory; Male fitness; Pieris rapae; Raphanus raphanistrum; Resistance; Tolerance

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE; FEMALE; FITNESS; HERBIVORY; INSECT; MALE; TOLERANCE; TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; INSECTA; PIERIS RAPAE; RAPHANUS RAPHANISTRUM;

EID: 0344153724     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/02-0267     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Agrawal, A. A., S. Y. Strauss, and M. J. Stout. 1999. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53:1093-1104.
2. Agren, J., and D. W. Schemske. 1993. The cost of defense against herbivores: an experimental study of trichome production in Brassica rapa. American Naturalist 141:338-350.
3. Bodnaryk, R. P. 1996. Physical and chemical defences of pods and seeds of white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) against tarnished plant bugs, Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Heteroptera: Miridae). Canadian Journal of Plant Science 76:33-36.
4. Bodnaryk, R. P. 1997. Will low-glucosinolate cultivars of the mustards Brassica juncea and Sinapis alba be vulnerable to insect pests? Canadian Journal of Plant Science 77:283-287.
5. Conner, J. K., S. Rush, S. Kercher, and P. Jennetten. 1996. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). II. Selection through lifetime male and total fitness. Evolution 50:1137-1146.
6. Devlin, B., J. Clegg, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1992. The effect of flower production on male reproductive success in wild radish populations. Evolution 46:1030-1042.
7. Devlin, B., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. American Naturalist 136:87-107.
8. Fineblum, W. L., and M. D. Rausher. 1995. Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory. Nature 377:517-520.
9. Glen, D. M., H. Jones, and J. K. Fieldsend. 1990. Damage to oilseed rape seedlings by the field slug Deroceras reticulatum in relation to glucosinolate concentrations. Annals of Applied Biology 117:197-208.
10. Juenger, T., and J. Bergelson. 1997. Pollen and resource limitation of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 78:1684-1695.
11. Lehtilä, K., and S. Y. Strauss. 1997. Leaf damage by herbivores affects attractiveness to pollinators in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 111:396-403.
12. Lennartsson, T., J. Tuomi, and P. Nilsson. 1997. Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). American Naturalist 149:1147-1155.
13. Leon, J., E. Rojo, and J. J. Sanchez-Serrano. 2001. Wound signalling in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 52:1-9.
14. Maschinski, J., and T. G. Whitham. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability, and timing. American Naturalist 134:1-19.
15. Mauricio, R. 1998. Costs of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. American Naturalist 151:20-28.
16. Mauricio, R. 2000. Natural selection and the joint evolution of tolerance and resistance as plant defenses. Evolutionary Ecology 14:491-507.
17. Mauricio, R., M. D. Rausher, and D. S. Burdick. 1997. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301-1311.
18. Mazer, S. J. 1987. The quantitative genetics of life history and fitness components in Raphanus raphanistrum L. (Brassicaceae): ecological and evolutionary consequences of seed weight variation. American Naturalist 130:891-914.
19. Paige, K. N., and T. G. Whitham. 1987. Overcompensation in response to herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. American Naturalist 129:407-416.
20. Pierce, S., K. Maxwell, H. Griffiths, and W. Klaus. 2001. Hydrophobic trichome layers and epicuticular wax powders in Bromeliaceae. American Journal of Botany 88:1371-1389.
21. Reymond, P., H. Weber, M. Damond, and E. E. Farmer. 2000. Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 707-719.
22. SAS. 1999. SAS PROC REG. Version 7. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
23. Siemens, D. H., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1996. Glucosinolates and herbivory by specialists (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): consequences of concentration and induced resistance. Environmental Entomology 25: 1344-1353.
24. Stanton, M. L., J. K. Bereczky, and H. D. Hasbrouck. 1987. Pollination thoroughness and maternal yield regulation in wild radish Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Oecologia (Berlin) 74:68-76.
25. Stowe, K. A. 1998. Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52:703-712.
26. Stowe, K. A., R. J. Marquis, C. G. Hochwender, and E. L. Simms. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:565-595.
27. Strauss, S. Y., and A. A. Agrawal. 1999. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:179-185.
28. Strauss, S. Y., J. K. Conner, and K. P. Lehtilä. 2001. Effects of foliar herbivory by insects on the fitness of Raphanus raphanistrum: damage can increase male fitness. American Naturalist 158:496-504.
29. Tiffin, P. 2000. Mechanisms of tolerance to herbivore damage: what do we know? Evolutionary Ecology 14:523-536.
30. Tiffin, P., and M. D. Rausher. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting on tolerance to herbivory in the common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. American Naturalist 154:700-716.
31. Van der Meijden, E., M. Wijn, and H. J. Verkaar. 1988. Defense and regrowth: alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355-363.