Assessing economic change in HOPE VI neighborhoods

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 621-655

  Zielenbach, Sean ^a  

^a Housing Research Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Community development and revitalization; Low income housing; Neighborhood

Indexed keywords

EID: 8744272756     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: 10511482     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2003.9521489     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Abt Associates, Inc. 2001a. Interim Assessment of the HOPE VI Program: Case Study of Techwood Homes and Clark Howell Homes in Atlanta, Georgia. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
2. Abt Associates, Inc. 2001b. Interim Assessment of the HOPE VI Program: Case Study of Earle Village in Charlotte, North Carolina. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
3. BAE Pittman & Hames. 1999. Market Analysis of the Southeast Corridor Transit Station Areas. Unpublished report prepared for the City of Seattle. August.
4. Brophy, Paul C., and Rhonda N. Smith. 1997. Mixed-Income Housing: Factors for Success. Cityscape 3(2):3-29.
5. Brown, Prudence, Benjamin Butler, and Ralph Hamilton. 2001. The Sandtown-Winchester Neighborhood Transformation Initiative: Lessons Learned about Community-Building and Implementation. Report prepared for the Enterprise Foundation. World Wide Web page 〈http://www.aecf.org/publications/data/sandtown.pdf〉 (accessed October 21, 2003).
6. Buron, Larry, Susan Popkin, Diane Levy, Laura Harris, and Jill Khadduri. 2002. The HOPE VI Resident Tracking Study. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Public Housing Investments. World Wide Web page 〈http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410591_HOPEVI_ResTrack.pdf〉 (accessed October 21, 2003).
7. Crane, Jon. 1991. Effects of Neighborhood on Dropping Out of School and Teenage Childrearing. In The Urban Underclass, ed. Christopher Jencks and Paul E. Peterson, 299-320. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
8. Ding, Chengri, and Gerrit-Jan Knaap. 2002. Property Values in Inner-City Neighborhoods: The Effects of Homeownership, Housing Investment, and Economic Development. Housing Policy Debate 13(4):701-27.
9. Ding, Chengri, Robert Simons, and Esmail Baku. 2000. The Effect of Residential Investment on Nearby Property Values: Evidence from Cleveland, Ohio. Journal of Real Estate Research 19(1):23-48.
10. Ellen, Ingrid Gould, and Margery Austin Turner. 1997. Does Neighborhood Matter? Assessing Recent Evidence. Housing Policy Debate 8(4):833-66.
11. Epp, Gayle. 1996. Emerging Strategies for Revitalizing Public Housing Communities. Housing Policy Debate 7(3):563-88.
12. Galster, George C., Peter Tatian, and Robin Smith. 1999. The Impact of Neighbors Who Use Section 8 Certificates on Property Values. Housing Policy Debate 10(4):879-917.
13. Goetz, Edward G., Hin Kin Lam, and Anne Heitlinger. 1996. There Goes the Neighborhood? Subsidized Housing in Urban Neighborhoods. CURA Reporter 26(1):1-6.
14. Gurwitt, Rob. 1995. The Projects Come Down. Governing 8(11):16-22.
15. Holloway, Steven R., Deborah Bryan, Robert Chabot, Donna M. Rogers, and James Rulli. 1998. Exploring the Effect of Public Housing on the Concentration of Poverty in Columbus, Ohio. Urban Affairs Review 33(6):767-89.
16. Holly Park to Rise Again. 1997. Seattle Times, May 6.
17. Howell, Joseph T., and Michael W. Leonard. 1999. Marketing HOPE VI Housing: Getting It Right in Mixed-Income Communities. Journal of Housing and Community Development 56(3):25-32.
18. Keating, Larry. 2000a. Redeveloping Public Housing: Relearning Urban Renewal's Immutable Lessons. Journal of the American Planning Association 66(4):384-97.
19. Keating, Larry. 2000b. Sixty and Out. Journal of Urban History 26(3):275-312.
20. Kingsley, G. Thomas, Jennifer Johnson, and Kathryn L.S. Pettit. 2001. HOPE VI and Section 8: Spatial Patterns in Relocation. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
21. Massey, Douglas S., and Shawn M. Kanaiaupuni. 1993. Public Housing and the Concentration of Poverty. Social Science Quarterly 74(1):109-22.
22. National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing. 1992. Final Report to the Congress and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC.
23. National Housing Law Project, Poverty & Race Research Action Council, Sherwood Research Associates, and Everywhere and Now Public Housing Residents Organizing Nationally Together. 2002. False HOPE: A Critical Assessment of the HOPE VI Public Housing Redevelopment Program. Oakland, CA: National Housing Law Project.
24. Newman, Sandra J., and Ann B. Schnare. 1997. "...And a Suitable Living Environment": The Failure of Housing Programs to Deliver on Neighborhood Quality. Housing Policy Debate 8(4):703-41.
25. Popkin, Susan J. 2002. The HOPE VI Program: What about the Residents? Urban Institute Policy Brief. World Wide Web page 〈http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/310593_ HopeVI.pdf〉 (accessed October 21, 2003).
26. Popkin, Susan J., Larry F. Buron, Diane K. Levy, and Mary K. Cunningham. 2000b. The Gautreaux Legacy: What Might Mixed-Income and Dispersal Strategies Mean for the Poorest Public Housing Tenants? Housing Policy Debate 11(4):911-42.
27. Popkin, Susan J., Victoria E. Gwiasda, Lynn M. Olson, Dennis P. Rosenbaum, and Larry Buron. 2000a. Crime and the Tragedy of Public Housing in Chicago. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
28. Rohe, William M., and Lance Freeman. 2001. Assisted Housing and Residential Segregation: The Role of Race and Ethnicity in the Siting of Assisted Housing Developments. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(3):279-92.
29. Salama, Jerry J. 1999. The Redevelopment of Distressed Public Housing: Early Results from HOPE VI Projects in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio. Housing Policy Debate 10(1):95-142.
30. Santiago, Anna M., George C. Galster, and Peter Tatian. 2001. Assessing the Property Value Impacts of the Dispersed Housing Subsidy Program in Denver. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20(1):65-88.
31. Schill, Michael H., Ingrid Gould Ellen, Amy Ellen Schwartz, and Ioan Voicu. 2002. Revitalizing Inner-City Neighborhoods: New York City's Ten-Year Plan. Housing Policy Debate 13(3):529-66.
32. Simons, Robert A., Roberto G. Quercia, and Ivan Maric. 1998. The Value Impact of New Residential Construction and Neighborhood Disinvestment on Residential Sales Price. Journal of Real Estate Research 15(1/2):147-61.
33. Vale, Lawrence J. 1998. Public Housing and the American Dream: Residents' Views on Buying into "The Projects." Housing Policy Debate 9(2):267-98.
34. Vale, Lawrence J. 2000. From the Puritans to the Projects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Varady, David P. 1982. Indirect Benefits of Subsidized Housing Programs. Journal of the American Planning Association 48(4):432-40.
36. Venkatesh, Sudhir Alladi. 2000. American Project: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Wexler, Harry J. 2001. HOPE VI: Market Means/Public Ends - The Goals, Strategies, and Midterm Lessons of HUD's Urban Revitalization Demonstration Program. Journal of Affordable Housing 10(3):195-233.
38. Wilson, William Julius. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Zielenbach, Sean. 2000. The Art of Revitalization. New York: Garland.
40. Zielenbach, Sean. 2003. Catalyzing Community Development: HOPE VI and Neighborhood Revitalization. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development Law 13(1):40-80.
41. Zielenbach, Sean. 2003. The Economic Impact of HOPE VI on Neighborhoods. Housing Research report prepared for HUD's Office of Public and Assisted Housing. January 2003.