Emerging strategies for revitalizing public housing communities

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 563-588

  Epp, Gayle ^a,b  

^a Epp Associates

^b National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing

Author keywords

Policy; Public housing; Revitalization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000925810     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.1996.9521233     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Abt Associates. 1988. Study of the Modernization Needs of the Public and Indian Housing Stock - National, Regional, and Field Office Estimates: Backlog of Modernization Needs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
2. Cavanaugh, Gordon. 1992. Comment on Kathryn P. Nelson and Jill Khadduri's "To Whom Should Limited Housing Resources Be Directed?" Housing Policy Debate 3(1):67-75.
3. Epp Associates, TAMS Consultants, Inc., and Swander Associates. 1990. Redevelopment Handbook: Procedures and Design Guidelines for Redeveloping Public Housing. Prepared for the Massachusetts Executive Office of Communities and Development. Boston.
4. Epp, Gayle, and Jonathan Lane. 1992. Capital Improvement Programs and the Physical Condition of Public Housing. In Working Papers on Identifying and Addressing Severely Distressed Public Housing, National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing, 5-1-5-55. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
5. Gentry, Richard C. 1993. Comment on Lawrence J. Vale's "Beyond the Problem Projects Paradigm: Defining and Revitalizing 'Severely Distressed' Public Housing." Housing Policy Debate 4(2):175-82.
6. ICF, Inc. 1992. The Modernization Needs of Severely Distressed Public Housing. In Working Papers on Identifying and Addressing Severely Distressed Public Housing, National Commission on Severely Distressed Public Housing, B-1-B-24. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.