Peer evaluation in a mandatory cooperative education environment

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 7749-7755

  Ohland, Matthew W ^a   Finelli, Cynthia J ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KETTERING UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTORATING SYSTEM; EDUCATION ENVIRONMENT; WHITE STUDENT POPULATION;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; ENGINEERS; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; STUDENTS; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 8744238430     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Kaufman, D.B., R.M. Felder, and H. Fuller. (1999). Peer ratings in cooperative learning teams. In proc. ASEE Annual Conference. ASEE, Charlotte, NC, June 1999.
2. Layton, R.A. and M.W. Ohland (2000). Peer evaluations in teams of predominantly minority students. In proc. ASEE Annual Conference. ASEE, St. Louis, MO, June 2000.
3. Brown, R.W. (1995). Autorating: Getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork. In proc. Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE/ASEE, Pittsburgh, PA, November 1995.
4. Layton, R.A. and M.W. Ohland (2001). Peer ratings revisited: Focus on teamwork, not ability. ASEE Annual Conference. ASEE, Albuquerque, NM, June 2001.
5. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith (1998). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Second Edition, Interaction Book Co., Edina, MN.
6. Shavelson, R.J. (1988). Statistic Reasoning for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, MA, p. 608.
7. Ohland, M.W. and R.A. Layton (2000). Comparing the reliability of two peer evaluation instruments. In proc. ASEE Annual Conference. ASEE, St. Louis, MO, June 2000.