Peer ratings revisited: Focus on teamwork, not ability

ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 7757-7764

  Layton, Richard A ^a,c   Ohland, Matthew W ^b  

^a Rose Hutman Institute of Technology

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ROSE HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE LEARNING; STUDENT PEER RATINGS; TEAMWORK;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CURRICULA; EVALUATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SCHEDULING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 8744220712     PISSN: 01901052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Brown, R.W. (1995). Autorating: Getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork. In proc. Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE/ASEE, Pittsburgh, November 1995.
2. Kaufman, D.B., Felder, R.M., and Fuller, H. (2000). Accounting for individual effort in cooperative learning teams. J. Engineering Education, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 133-140.
3. Layton, R.A. and Ohland, M.W. (2000). Peer evaluations in teams of predominantly minority students. In proc. ASEE Annual Conference. ASEE, St. Louis, June 2000.
4. Felder, R.M., Stice, J.E. and Brent, R. (1999). Implementing formal cooperative learning. In handbook, Na-tional Effective Teaching Institute. ASEE, Charlotte, June 1999.
5. Ohland, M.W. and Layton, R.A. (2000). Comparing the reliability of two peer evaluation instruments. In proc. ASEE Annual Conference. ASEE, St. Louis, June 2000.
6. Shavelson, R.J. (1988). Statistic Reasoning in the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, p. 608.