Metamemory and reality monitoring

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 407-428

  Kelly, Amy ^a   Carroll, Marie ^a   Mazzoni, Giuliana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANBERRA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DRAWING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 8744230754     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.803     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson RE. 1984. Did I do it or did I only imagine doing it? Journal of Experimental Psychology : General 113: 594-613.
2. Batchelder WH, Riefer DM. 1990. Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review 97: 548-564.
3. Begg I, Duft S, Lalonde P, Melnick R, Sanvito J. 1989. Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language 28: 610-632.
4. Belli RF, Lindsay DS, Gales MS, McCarthy TT. 1994. Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Memory & Cognition 22: 40-54.
5. Bornstein BH, LeCompte DC. 1995. A comparison of item and source forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2: 254-259.
6. Brown AS, Halliday HE. 1991. Cryptonesia and source memory difficulties. American Journal of Psychology 104: 475-490.
7. Carroll M, Korukina S. 1999. The effect of test coherence and modality on metamemory judgments. Memory 7: 309-322.
8. Carroll M, Mazzoni G, Andrews S, Pocock P. 1999. Monitoring the future: Object and source memory for real and imagined events. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology 13: 373-390.
9. Cohen G, Faulkner D. 1989. Age differences in source forgetting: Effects on reality monitoring and on eyewitness testimony. Psychology and Aging 4: 10-17.
10. Destun LM, Kuiper NA. 1996. Autobiographical memory and recovered memory therapy: Integrating cognitive, clinical, and individual difference perspectives. Clinical Psychology Review 16: 421-450.
11. Dunlosky J, Nelson TO. 1994. Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language 33 545-565.
12. Eysenck M. 1979. Depth, elaboration and distinctiveness. In Levels of Processing in Human Memory, Cermak LS, Craik FIM (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
13. Foley MA, Durso FT, Wilder A, Friedman R. 1991. Developmental comparisons of explicit versus implicit imagery and reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 51: 1-13.
14. Foley MA, Foley HJ, Durso FT, Smith NK. 1997. Investigations of closure processes: What source-monitoring judgments suggest about what is 'closing'. Memory & Cognition 25: 140-155.
15. Hoffman HG. 1997. Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: Evidence from source attribution biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 371-383.
16. Jacoby LJ. 1991. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 513-541.
17. Jacoby LL, Kelley C, Brown J, Jasechko J. 1989a. Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences on the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 326-338.
18. Jacoby LL, Kelley CM, Dywan J. 1989b. Memory attributions. In Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving, Roediger HL, Craik FIM (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Jacoby LL, Woloshyn V, Kelley C. 1989c. Becoming famous without being recognised: Unconscious influences of memory produced by divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 115-125.
20. Johnson MK. 1988a. Discriminating the origin of information. In Delusional Beliefs: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Oltmanns TF, Maher BA (eds). John Wiley: New York.
21. Johnson MK. 1988b. Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117: 390-394.
22. Johnson MK, Foley MA, Suengas AG, Raye CL. 1988. Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117: 371-376.
23. Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. 1993. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 114: 3-28.
24. Johnson MK, Raye CL. 1981. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review 88: 76-85.
25. Johnson MK, Raye CL, Hasher L, Chromiak W. 1979. Are there developmental differences in reality monitoring? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 27: 120-128.
26. Kahan TL. 1996. Memory source confusions: Effects of character rotation and sensory modality. American Journal of Psychology 109: 431-449.
27. Kahan TL, Johnson MK. 1990. Memory for real and imagined rotations of alphanumeric characters. Journal of Mental Imagery 14: 119-129.
28. Kelley CM, Jacoby LL, Hollingshead A. 1989. Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: Judgments of modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 1101-1108.
29. Koriat A. 1997. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126: 346-370.
30. Koriat A, Goldsmith M. 1996. Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review 103: 490-517.
31. Leonesio RJ, Nelson TO. 1990. Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 464-470.
32. Lindsay DS, Johnson MK. 1989. The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition 17: 349-358.
33. Lindsay DS, Johnson MK, Kwon P. 1991. Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 52: 297-318.
34. Loftus EF. 1979. Eyewitness Testimony. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
35. Loftus EF. 1993. The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist 48: 518-537.
36. Maki RH, Berry SL. 1984. Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10: 663-679.
37. Marsh RL, Landau JD, Hicks JL. 1997. Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 886-897.
38. Mazzoni G, Cornoldi C, Tomat L, Vecchi T. 1997. Remembering the grocery shopping list: A study of metacognitive biases. Applied Cognitive Psychology 11: 253-267.
39. McGinnis D, Roberts P. 1996. Qualitative characteristics of vivid memories attributed to real and imagined experiences. American Journal of Psychology 109: 59-77.
40. Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP. 1994. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
41. Narens L, Jameson KA, Lee VA. 1994. Subthreshold priming and memory monitoring. In Metacognition: Knowing about knowing, Metcalfe J, Shimamura P (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
42. Nelson TO, Narens L. 1990. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 26), Bower G (ed.). Academic Press: New York.
43. Roediger III HL. 1996. Memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 76-100.
44. Schooler JW, Clark CA, Loftus EF. 1988. Knowing when memory is real. In Practical Aspects of Memory: Current research and issues Gruneberg MM, Morris PE (eds). John Wiley: New York.
45. Spellman BA, Bjork RA. 1992. When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science 3: 315-316.
46. Weingardt KR, Loftus EF, Lindsay DS. 1995. Misinformation revisited: New evidence on the suggestibility of memory. Memory & Cognition 23: 72-82.