Good Faith in the Jurisprudence of the WTO: The Protection of Legitimate Expectations, Good Faith Interpretation and Fair Dispute Settlement

Good Faith in the Jurisprudence of the WTO: The Protection of Legitimate Expectations, Good Faith Interpretation and Fair Dispute Settlement

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-396

  Panizzon, Marion ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85203376220     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (235)

1. ABBOTT, F (2002) ‘The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner at the WTO’ 5 Journal of International Economic Law (JIEL), pp 469–505.
2. ABBOTT, F, Cottier, T and Gurry, F (1999) The International Intellectual Property System, Commentary and Materials (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
3. ALLOT, P (1996) ‘The International Court and the Voice of Justice in The International Court of Justice and Sources of International Law’, in V Lowe and M Fitzmaurice (eds) Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice, Essays in Honor of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge, Grotius Publications), pp 17–39.
4. ATRIA, F and MACCORMICK, DN (2003) Law and Legal Interpretation (Dartmouth, Ashgate).
5. BACCHUS, J (2002) ‘Table Talk: Around the Table of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ 35 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, pp 1021–39.
6. BACCHUS, J (2003a) ‘The Bicycle Club: Affirming the American Interest in the Future of the WTO’ 37 Journal of World Trade, pp 42–441.
7. BACCHUS, J (2003b) ‘Groping Towards Grotius: The WTO and the International Rule of Law’ 44 Harvard International Law Journal, pp 533–50.
8. BACCHUS, J (2003c) ‘ “Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda”: The Consolations of WTO Dispute Settlement’, Address by James Bacchus, Chairman, Appellate Body, WTO, to the International Bar Association, Geneva, March 20, 2003, http://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles.htm#bacchus (21 December 2005).
9. BACCHUS, J (2003d) “Lecky” Circle: Thoughts from the Frontier of International Law’, Address by James Bacchus, Chairman, AB WTO, at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London, April 10, 2003, http://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles.htm#bacchus (21 December 2005).
10. BAGCHI, A (2003) ‘Compulsory Licensing and the Duty of Good Faith in TRIPS’ 55 Stanford Law Review, pp 1529–55.
11. BARFIELD, CE (2001) Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization (Washington, DC, American Enterprise Institute (AEI) Press).
12. BARTELS, L (2001) ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ 35 Journal of World Trade, pp 449–519.
13. BENEDEK, W (1990) Die Rechtsordnung des GATT aus völkerrechtlicher Sicht, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht, Band 100 (Berlin, Springer Verlag).
14. BERNHARDT, R (1963) Die Auslegung völkerrechtlicher Verträge, insbesondere in der neueren Rechtsprechung internationaler Gerichte, Max-Planck-Institute für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 40 (Köln, Karl Heymanns Verlag).
15. BERNARDEZ, ST (1998) ‘Interpretation of Treaties by the International Court of Justice Following the Adoption of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ in G Hafner, G Loibl, A Rest, L Sucharipa-Behrmann and K Zemanek (eds) Liber Amicorum Professor Seidl-Hohenveldern (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 720–48.
16. BHAGWATI, J and Mavroidis, P (2003) ‘Why the Byrd Amendment Must Be Buried’ 7 Bridges, 7, January/February 2003, http://www.ictsd.org/monthly/bridges/BRIDGES7-1.pdf pp 8–9 (21 December 2005).
17. Black’s Law Dictionary (1999) BA Garner (ed) 7th edn (St Paul, Minn, West Group).
18. BLOCHE, MG (2002) ‘WTO Deference to National Health Policy: Towards an Interpretive Principle’ 5 JIEL, pp 825–48.
19. BLUM, YZ (1997) ‘The Role of Equity in International Law’ in Alfredo Mordechai Rabello (ed) Aequitas and Equity: Equity in Civil Law and Mixed Jurisdictions (Greene Fund for Equity Studies, Jerusalem Hamaccabi Press (Jack)), pp 229–38.
20. BOURGEOIS, JHJ (1998) ‘WTO Dispute Settlement in the Field of Anti-Dumping Law’ 1 JIEL, pp 259–75.
21. BRONCKERS, M (2001) ‘More Power to the WTO?’ 4 JIEL, pp 41–56.
22. BRONCKERS, M and MCNELIS, N (2000) ‘Fact and Law in Pleadings before the WTO Appellate Body’ in MCEJ Bronckers (ed) A Cross-Section of WTO Law (London, Cameron May), pp 241–74, first published, 1999, in 5 International Trade Law and Regulation.
23. BROWN WEISS, E (2000) ‘The Rise or Fall of International Law? The Robert L Levine Distinguished Lecture Series’ 69 Fordham Law Review, pp 345–72.
24. BROWNLIE, I (1998a) Principles of Public International Law, 5th edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
25. BROWNLIE, I (1998b) The Rule of Law in International Affairs, International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
26. CAMERON, JK and CAMPBELL K (1998) ‘Introduction’ in J Cameron and K Campbell (eds) Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization (London, Cameron May), pp 18–27.
27. CAMERON, JK and GRAY, KR (2001) ‘Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body’ 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, pp 248–98.
28. CANAL-FORGUES, E (2001) ‘Sur l’interprétation dans le Droit de l’OMC’ 105 Revue Générale de Droit International Public, pp 5–24.
29. CANAL-FORGUES, E (2003) Le règlement des différends à l’OMC (Bruxelles, Etablissement Emile Bruylant, SA).
30. CHARLESWORTH, H and CHINKIN, C (2000) The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
31. CHARME, JS (1992) ‘The Interim Obligation of Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: Making Sense of An Enigma’ 25 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, pp 71ff.
32. CHARNOVITZ, S (2003) ‘The Byrd Amendment Ruling Needs Careful Review’ 7 Bridges January/February 2003, http://www.ictsd.org/monthly/bridges/BRIDGES7-1.pdf,pp 9–10 (21 December 2005).
33. CHENG, B (1987) General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge, Grotius Publications Limited).
34. CHUA, ATL (1998) ‘Precedents and Principles of WTO Panel Jurisprudence’ 16 Berkeley Journal of International Law, pp 171–96.
35. CHO, S-J (1998) ‘GATT NVNI Issues in the WTO Framework: Are They the Achilles’ Heel of the Dispute Settlement Process?’ 39 Harv Int’l LJ, pp 311–55.
36. COTTIER, T (1993) ‘Constitutional Trade Regulation in National and International Law: Structure-Substance Pairings in the EFTA Experience’ in M Hilf and E-U Petersmann (eds) National Constitutions and International Economic Law, Studies in Transnational Economic Law (Deventer, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers), pp 409–43.
37. COTTIER, T (1998) ‘Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Characteristics and Structural Implications for the European Union’ 35 Common Market Law Review, pp 325–78.
38. COTTIER, T (2000) ‘Limits to International Trade: The Constitutional Challenge’ in Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Washington DC, pp 220–2.
39. COTTIER, T (2001) ‘A Theory of Direct Effect in Global Law’ in A von Bogdandy, PC Mavroidis and Y Mény (eds) European Integration and International Co-ordination, Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honor of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 99–124.
40. COTTIER, T and HERTIG, M (2004) ‘The Prospects of 21 Century Constitutionalism’ in A von Bogdandy and R Wolfrum (eds) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 7 (2003) (Leiden, Boston), pp 261–328.
41. COTTIER, T and MAVROIDIS, PC (2003) ‘Concluding Remarks’ in T Cottier and PC Mavroidis (eds) The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO, The World Trade Forum, vol 4 (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press), pp 349–57.
42. COTTIER, T and NADAKAVUKAREN SCHEFER, K (1997) ‘NVNI Complaints in WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement: Past, Present and Future’ in Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (ed) International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Studies in Transnational Economic Law, Volume 11 (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 145–83.
43. COTTIER, T (1998) ‘The Relationship between World Trade Organization Law, National and Regional Law’ 1 JIEL, pp 83–122.
44. COTTIER, T (2000) ‘Good Faith and the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in the WTO’ in M Bronckers and R Quick (eds) New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honor of John H Jackson (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 47–68.
45. COTTIER, T and OESCH, M (2001) ‘WTO Law: Precedents and Legal Change’ 3 Turku Law Journal, pp 29–30.
46. COTTIER, T (2003) ‘The Paradox of Judicial Review in International Trade Regulation: Towards a Comprehensive Framework’ in T Cottier and PC Mavroidis (eds) The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO, The World Trade Forum, vol 4 (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press), pp 287–306.
47. COTTIER, T, OESCH, M and FISCHER, TM (2005) International Trade Regulation Law and Policy in the WTO: The European Union and Switzerland. Cases, Materials and Comments (London and Berne, Cameron May and Stämpfli Publishers).
48. COTTIER, T and PANIZZON, M (2004) ‘Legal Perspectives on Traditional Knowledge: The Case for Intellectual Property Protection’ 7 JIEL, pp 371–99.
49. COTTIER, T (2006) ‘International Trade Regulation for Plant Genetic Resources and Related Products’ in S Biber–Klemm and T Cottier (eds) Rights to Traditional Knowledge and Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (Wallingford, CABI Publishing).
50. DAHM, G, DELBRÜCK, J and WOLFRUM, R (2002) Völkerrecht, 5th edn, Band I/3 ‘Die Formen des völkerrechtlichen Handelns; Die inhaltliche Ordnung der internationalen Gemeinschaft’ (Berlin, De Gruyter Recht).
51. D’AMATO, A (1992) ‘Good Faith’ in R Bernhardt (ed) Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume I (Amsterdam, Elsevier North-Holland), pp 559–601.
52. DAVEY, WJ (1992) ‘The United States Court of International Trade and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’ in E-U Petersmann and G Jaenicke (eds) Adjudication of International Trade Disputes in International and National Economic Law (Fribourg, University Press Fribourg Switzerland), pp 297–322.
53. DAVEY, WJ (2000) ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: Segregating the Useful Political Aspects and Avoiding “Over-Legalization” ’ in M Bronckers and R Quick (eds) New Directions in International Economic Law, Essays in Honor of John H Jackson (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 291–307.
54. DAVEY, WJ (2001) ‘Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded its Authority?’ 4 JIEL, pp 79–110.
55. DEARDORFF, AV (2001) ‘Market Access for Developing Countries’ in R Porter, P Sauvé, A Subramanian and AB Zampetti (eds) Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy, The Multilateral Trading System at the Millenium (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press), pp 159–73.
56. DEGAN, VD (1997) Sources of International Law (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
57. DEKKER, IF and WERNER WG (1999) ‘The Completeness of International Law and Hamlet’s Dilemma, Non-Liquet, The Nuclear Weapons Case and Legal Theory’ 68 Nordic Journal of International Law, pp 225–47.
58. DETMOLD, MJ (1989) ‘Law as Practical Reason’ 48 Cambridge Law Journal, pp 436–71.
59. DE VISSCHER, C (1972) De l’Equité dans le Règlement Arbitral ou Judiciaires des Litiges de Droit International Public (Paris, Editions A Pedone).
60. DE WITTE, B (2000) ‘Institutional Principles: A Special Category of General Principles of EC Law’ in U Bernitz and J Nergelius (eds) General Principles of European Community Law, European Monographs (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 143–59.
61. DOLLAR, D (2001) ‘Fostering Equity through International Institutions’ in R Porter, P Sauvé, A Subramanian and AB Zampetti (eds) Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy, The Multilateral Trading System at the Millenium (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press), pp 212–21.
62. DWORKIN, R (1987) Taking Rights Seriously: New Impression with a Reply to Critics (London, Duckworth).
63. DURLING, JP and NICELY, MR (2002) Understanding the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, Negotiating History and Subsequent Interpretation (London, Cameron May).
64. EHLERMANN, C-D (2002) ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”: Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ 36 Journal of World Trade, pp 605–39.
65. EHLERMANN, C-D (2003a) ‘Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO’ 6 JIEL, pp 695–709.
66. EHLERMANN, C-D (2003b) ‘Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO’, Address to the American Society of International Law, Washington, DC (April 3, 2003).
67. EHLERMANN, C-D and EHRING, L (2005) ‘The Authoritative Interpretation under Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the WTO’ 8 JIEL, pp 803–24.
68. EHRING, L (2002) ‘De Facto Discrimination in World Trade Law, National and MostFavoured Nation Treatment—or Equal Treatment?’ 36 Journal of World Trade, pp 921–77.
69. ESTY, DC (2002) ‘The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis’ 1 World Trade Review, pp 7–22.
70. FISH, S (1989) ‘Working on the Chain Gang: Interpretation in Law and Literature’ in S Fish (ed) Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (Oxford, Clarendon Press), pp 87–102.
71. FOOTER, M and ZIA-ZARIFI, S (2002) ‘Case Notes, European Communities—Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, The World Trade Organization on Trial for its Handling of Occupational Health and Safety Issues’ 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law, pp 120–42.
72. FRANCK, TM (1995) Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
73. GAFFNEY, JP (1999) ‘Due Process in the World Trade Organization: the Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System’ 14 American University International Law Review, pp 1173–221.
74. GARCIA-RUBIO, M (2001) ‘On the Application of Customary Rules of State Responsibility by the WTO Dispute Settlement Organs: A General International Law Perspective’, Working Paper, Graduate Institute of International Studies (Geneva, the Graduate Institute of International Studies Geneva).
75. GOLDSMITH, JL and POSNER, EA (2005) The Limits of International Law, Part 2, Treaties, Section 5, International Trade (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
76. GROTIUS, H, ‘The Rights of War and Peace (De Jure Belli ac Pacis, In quibus ius naturae & Gentium)’, Book II, chapter XVI, The Interpretation of Treaties, Paris: 1625, English translation by Campbell AC, London, 1814, http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm (21 December 2005), original Latin version at http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/Visualiseur?Destination=Gallica&O=NUMM-58022 (21 December 2005).
77. GROUSSET, X (2000) ‘General Principles of Community Law in the Creation and Development of Due Process Principles in Competition Law Proceedings: From Transcoean Marine Plant (1974) to Montecatini (1999)’ in U Bernitz and J Nergelius (eds) General Principles of European Community Law, European Monographs (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 185–204.
78. GATT SECRETARIAT (1994) The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, The Legal Texts (Geneva, World Trade Organization).
79. HARTLEY, TC (2003) The Foundations of European Community Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Community (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
80. HENDERSON, D (2002) ‘WTO 2002: Imaginary Crisis, Real Problems’ 1 World Trade Review, pp 277–96.
81. HERDEGEN, M (2000) ‘The Origins and Development of the General Principles of Community Law’ in U Bernitz and J Nergelius (eds) General Principles of European Community Law: European Monographs (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 3–21.
82. HILF, M (2001) ‘Power, Rules and Principles—Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?’ 4 JIEL, pp 111–30.
83. HILF, M and PUTH, S (2002) ‘The Principle of Proportionality on its Way into WTO/GATT Law’ in A von Bogdandy, PC Mavroidis and Y Mény (eds) European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 199–218.
84. HOROWITZ, D (2002) ‘On Good Governance and WTO Disputes’ 6 International Trade Law and Regulation, pp 169–72.
85. HOWSE, R (2000) ‘Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence’ in JHH Weiler (ed) The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? (Academy of European Law, European University Institute; Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp 35–69.
86. HOWSE, R (2003) ‘The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence on the Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power’ in T Cottier and PC Mavroidis (eds) The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO, The World Trade Forum, vol 4 (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press), pp 11–41.
87. HOWSE, R (2003a) ‘The Jurisprudential Achievement of the WTO Appellate Body: A Preliminary Appreciation’, Preliminary First Draft, copy with author.
88. HOWSE, R and NICOLAIDIS, K (2003) ‘Legitimacy through “Higher Law”? Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far’ in T Cottier PC Mavroidis (eds) The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO, World Trade Forum vol 4 (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press), pp 307–48.
89. HU, J (2004) ‘The Role of International Law in the Development of WTO Law’ 7(1) JIEL, pp 143–67.
90. HUDEC, RE (2000) ‘Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in F Weiss and J Wiers (eds) Improving the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures (London, Cameron May Publishers), pp 345–76, http://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles.htm#hudec (21 December 2005).
91. IWASAWA, Y (2002) ‘WTO Dispute Settlement as Judicial Supervision’ 5 JIEL, pp 287–305.
92. JACKSON, JH (1992) ‘Status of Treaties in Domestic Legal Systems: A Policy Analysis’ 86 American Journal of International Law, pp 310–40.
93. JACKSON, JH (1998) ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding—Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’ in J Cameron and K Campbell (eds) Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization (London, Cameron May), pp 69–74.
94. JACKSON, JH (1999) The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press).
95. JACKSON, JH(2000) The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
96. JACKSON, JH(2002a) ‘Afterword: The Linkage Problem, Comments on Five Texts’ 96 AJIL, pp 118–25.
97. JACKSON, JH (2002b) ‘Perceptions about the WTO Trade Institutions’ 1 World Trade Review, pp 101–14.
98. JACKSON, JH and CROLEY, SP (1996) ‘WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments’ 90 AJIL, pp 193–213, also published in Jackson JH (2000) The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp 133–67.
99. JACKSON, JH, DAVEY, WJ and SYKES, AO (1995) Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text, 3rd edn, American Casebook Series (St Paul, Minn, West Publishing Co).
100. JACKSON, JH, DAVEY, WJ (2002) Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text, 4th edn, American Casebook Series (St Paul, Minn, West Publishing Co).
101. JACKSON, JH and BENKE, RTJ (2003) ‘The WTO Cases on US “Trade Remedies”: Opening a Discussion’ 6 JIEL, p 111.
102. JOYNER, CC (2005) International Law in the 21st Century: Rules for Global Governance, New Millenium Books in International Studies (Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield Publishers).
103. KAIKOBAD, KH (2000) The International Court of Justice and Judicial Review: A Study of the Court’s Powers with Respect to Judgments of the ILO and UN Administrative Tribunals, Studies and Materials on the Settlement of International Disputes, vol 6 (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
104. KEARNS, JE and CHARNOVITZ, S (2002) ‘Adjudicating Compliance in the WTO: A Review of DSU Article 21.5’ 5 JIEL, pp 331–52.
105. KELSEN, H (1960) Reine Rechtslehre (Wien, Verlag Österreich).
106. KENNEDY, D (1992) ‘The Sources of International Law’ in M Koskenniemi (ed) International Law, The International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory, Areas 5 (Aldershot, Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited), pp 293–388, reprinted from: (1987) 2 American University Journal of International Law and Policy, pp 1–96.
107. KERSE, CS (2000) ‘General Principles of Community Law: Procedural Guarantees—A Note’ in U Bernitz, J Nergelius (eds) General Principles of European Community Law, European Monographs (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 205–11.
108. KIM, DW (2004) NVNI Complaints in WTO Law: Theory and Practice, Doctoral Dissertation (World Trade Institute, University of Berne, Switzerland).
109. KISS, A (1992) ‘Abuse of Rights’ in R Bernhardt (ed) Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume I (Amsterdam, North Holland), pp 4–8.
110. KOLB, R (1998) ‘La Bonne Foi en Droit International Public’ 2 Revue Belge de Droit International, pp 661–732.
111. KOLB, R (2000) La Bonne Foi en Droit International Public, Contribution à l’étude des principes généraux de droit, Publications de l’Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).
112. KORHONEN, O (1996) ‘New International Law: Silence, Defence or Deliverance?’ 7 European Journal of International Law, pp 1–28.
113. KOSKENNIEMI, M (1985) ‘Reflexions on Constructivist Thinking in International Law’ 18 Oikeustiede-Jurisprudentia (Yearbook of the Finnish Law Society) 1985, pp 117–63.
114. KOSKENNIEMI, M (1989) From Apology to Utopia, The Structure of International Legal Argument (Helsinki, Finnish Lawyers’ Publishing Company).
115. KOSKENNIEMI, M (1990) ‘The Politics of International Law’ 1 EJIL, pp 4–32.
116. KOSKENNIEMI, M (1997) ‘Lauterpracht: The Victorian Tradition in International Law’ 8 EJIL, pp 215–63.
117. KOSKENNIEMI, M (2002) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
118. KOSKENNIEMI, M and LEINO, P (2002) ‘Fragmentation of International Law, Postmodern Anxieties’ 15 Leiden Journal of International Law, pp 553–79.
119. KUYPER, PJ (1995) ‘The New WTO Dispute Settlement System: The Impact on the Community’ in JHJ Bourgeois et al (eds) The Uruguay Round Results: A European Lawyers’ Perspective (Brussels, European Interuniversity Press and College of Europe), pp 87–114.
120. KUYPER, PJ (2000) ‘The Appellate Body and the Facts’ in M Bronckers, R Quick (eds) New Directions in International Economic Law, Essays in Honor of John H Jackson (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 309–23.
121. LANG, JT (2000) ‘Legal Certainty and Legitimate Expectations as General Principles of Law’ in U Bernitz, J Nergelius (eds) General Principles of European Community Law, European Monographs (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 163–81.
122. LAUTERPRACHT, H (1933) The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford, Oxford University Press); reprinted 1966, with the permission of Oxford University Press in Hamden, CT by Archon Books.
123. LEE, SH and JUNG, Y (2003) ‘The Legacy of the Byrd Amendment Controversies: Rethinking the Principle of Good Faith’ 37(5) Journal of World Trade, pp 921–58.
124. LENNARD, M (2002) ‘Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements’ 5 JIEL, pp 17–89.
125. LESTER, S and LEITNER, K (2003a) ‘Dispute Settlement Commentary (DSC): US–Offset Act (‘Byrd Amendment’)’ AB Report, http://www.worldtradelaw.net, update of 28 April 2003.
126. LESTER, S and LEITNER, K (2003b) ‘Dispute Settlement Commentary (DSC): US–Cotton Yarn’, AB Report, http://www.worldtradelaw.net, update of 4 April 2005.
127. LESTER, S and LEITNER, K (2003c) ‘Dispute Settlement Commentary (DSC): Mexico–HFCS (Article 21.5)’, AB Report, http://www.worldtradelaw.net, update of 22 March 2005.
128. LEVI-FAUR, D (2005) ‘The Political Economy of Globalization: Juridification, Adversarial Legalism, and Responsive Regulation. A Comment’ 59 International Organization, pp 451–62.
129. LOWE, V (1992) ‘The Role of Equity in International Law’ 12 Australian Yearbook of International Law 1992, pp 54–81.
130. LOWE, V relates to Lowe, Vaughan (2000) ‘The Politics of Law-Making: Are the Method and Character of Norm Creation Changing?’ in M Byers (ed) The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp 207–26.
131. LOWENFELD, AF (2002) International Economic Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
132. MACCORMICK, N (1999) ‘Reasonableness and Objectivity’ 74 Notre Dame Law Review, pp 1575–603.
133. MARCEAU, G (1999) ‘A Call for Coherence in International Law: Praises for the Prohibition Against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ 33 Journal of World Trade, pp 87–152.
134. MARCEAU, G (2000) ‘The General Legal Principles of the GATT and the WTO’, Speech, Libreville 2000 (Meeting of African Trade Ministers, Libreville, Gabon, 13–15 November 2000).
135. MARCEAU, G (2001) ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdiction: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement, MEAs and other Treaties’ 35 Journal of World Trade, pp 1081–131.
136. MARCEAU, G (2002) ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’ 13(4) JIEL, pp 753–814.
137. MARTHA, RSJ (2001) ‘The Duty to Exercise Judgment on the Fruitfulness of Actions in World Trade Law’ 35 Journal of World Trade, pp 1035–59.
138. MATSUSHITA, M, SCHOENBAUM, T and MAVROIDIS, PC (2003) The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
139. MCCALL SMITH, J (2003) ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: The Politics of Procedure in Appellate Body Rulings’ 2(1) World Trade Review, pp 65–100.
140. MCDOUGAL, MS (1967) ‘The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles Upon Interpretation: Textuality Redivivus’ 61 AJIL, pp 992 ff, reprinted in MS McDougal, HD Lasswell and JC Miller (eds) The Interpretation of International Agreements and World Public Order, Principles of Content and Procedure 1994 (New Haven, New Haven Press) Appendix 2, pp 419–42.
141. McDOUGAL, MS, LASSWELL, HD and MILLER, JC (1994) The Interpretation of International Agreements and World Public Order, Principles of Content and Procedure (New Haven, New Haven Press).
142. MCLINDEN, G (2005) ‘Trade Facilitation: Progress and Prospects for the Doha Negotiations’ in R Newfarmer (ed) Trade, Doha, and Development: A Window into the Issues (Washington, DC, World Bank Publications), pp 179–89.
143. MCNELIS, N (2003) ‘What Obligations are Created by World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Reports?’ 37 Journal of World Trade, pp 647–72.
144. MCRAE, DM (1998) ‘The Emerging Appellate Jurisdiction in International Trade Law’ in J Cameron and K Campbell (eds) Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization (London, Cameron May), pp 98–110.
145. MCRAE, DM (2003) ‘Claus-Dieter Ehlermann’s Presentation on “The Role and Record of Dispute Settlement Panels and the Appellate Body of the WTO” ’ 6 JIEL, pp 709–17.
146. MCWHINNEY, E (1973) ‘Equity in International Law’ in RA Newman (ed) Equity in the World’s Legal Systems: A Comparative Study (Brussels, Etablissements Emile Bruylant), pp 581–8.
147. MENDELSON, M (1996) ‘The International Court of Justice and Sources of International Law’ in V Lowe and M Fitzmaurice (eds) Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice, Essays in Honor of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge, Grotius Publications), pp 63–89.
148. MENGOZZI, P (1995) ‘The Marrakesh DSU and its Implications on the International and European Level’ in JHJ Bourgeois et al (eds) The Uruguay Round Results, A European Lawyer’s Perspective (Brussels, European Interuniversity Press and College of Europe), pp 115–40.
149. MÜLLER, JP (1971) Vertrauensschutz im Völkerrecht, Max-Planck—Institut für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, Band 56 (Köln, Carl Heymanns Verlag).
150. MÜLLER, JP (1995) ‘Article 2(2)’ in B Simma (ed) The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp 89–97.
151. MÜLLER, JP and COTTIER, T (1992) ‘Acquiescence’ in R Bernhardt (ed) Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume I (Amsterdam, Elsevier North Holland), pp 14–16.
152. MÜLLER, JP (1995) ‘Estoppel’ in R Bernhardt (ed) Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume II (Amsterdam, Elsevier North Holland), pp 116–18.
153. NADER, L and STARR, J (1973) ‘Is Equity Universal?’ in RA Newman (ed) Equity in the World’s Legal Systems: A Comparative Study (Brussels, Etablissements Emile Bruylant), pp 126–37.
154. NEUHAUS, RK (1984) Das Rechtsmissbrauchsverbot im heutigen Völkerrecht, Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung und Anwendbarkeit eines Begriffes, Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Band 80 (Berlin, Duncker und Humblot).
155. NEUMANN, J (2002) Die Koordination des WTO—Rechts mit anderen völkerrechtlichen Ordnungen, Konflikte des materiellen Rechts und Konkurrenzen der Streitbeilegung, Rechtsfragen der Globalisierung, Band 4 (Berlin, Duncker und Humblot).
156. NEWMAN, RA (1961) Equity and Law: A Comparative Study (New York, Oceana Publications Inc).
157. O’CONNOR, JF (1991) Good Faith in International Law (Aldershot, Dartmouth Publishing Company).
158. O’CUNNINGHAM, R and CRIBB, TH (2003) ‘Dispute Settlement thought the Lens of “Free Flow of Trade”: A Review of WTO Dispute Settlement of US Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures’ 6 JIEL, pp 155–70.
159. OESCH, M (2003a) ‘Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution’ 6 JIEL, pp 635–59.
160. OESCH, M (2003b) Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolution (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
161. OHLHOFF, S (2003) ‘Streitbeilegung in der WTO’ in H-J Priess and GM Berrisch (eds) WTO Handbuch (München, Verlag CH. Beck), pp 677–750.
162. OHLHOFF, S and SCHLOEMANN, H (1998) ‘Rational Allocation of Disputes and “Constitutionalisation”: Forum Choice as an Issue of Competence’ in J Cameron and K Campbell (eds) Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization (London, Cameron May), pp 302–29.
163. OXMAN, BH (2001) ‘Complementary Agreements and Compulsory Jurisdiction’ 95 AJIL, pp 277–312.
164. PALMETER, D and MAVROIDIS, PC (1998) ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’ 92 AJIL, pp 398–413.
165. PANIZZON, M and COTTIER, T (2005) ‘Developing Country Interests and Negotiating Positions on Protection of Geographical Indications and Traditional Knowledge’, in E-U Petersmann (ed) Developing Countries in the Doha Round: WTO DecisionMaking Procedures and WTO Negotiations on Trade in Agricultural Goods and Services (Florence, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute Publishing), pp 227–68.
166. PARLIN, CC (2002) The Formation of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism—Its Features and Principles; Disputes Involving Developing Countries, Law and Policy of International Economic Relations: The WTO Dispute Settlement System, Fall 2002 Seminar, Georgetown University Law Center.
167. PAUWELYN, J (2001) ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’ 95 AJIL, pp 535–87.
168. PAUWELYN, J (2003a) Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to other Rules of International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
169. PAUWELYN, J (2003b) ‘The Limits of Litigation: “Americanization” and Negotiation in the Settlement of WTO Disputes’ 19(3) Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, pp 121–40.
170. PAUWELYN, J (2003c) ‘Does the WTO Stand for “Deference to” or “Interference with” National Health Authorities When Applying the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement)?’ in T Cottier and PC Mavroidis (eds) The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO, World Trade Forum vol 4 (Ann Arbor, Michigan University Press), pp 175–92.
171. PAUWELYN, J (2004) ‘The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization’ in Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Washington, DC, pp 135–8.
172. PESCATORE, P (1993) ‘The GATT Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Its Present Situation and its Prospects’ 27 Journal of World Trade, pp 5–20.
173. PETERS, A (2002) ‘Cooperation in International Dispute Settlement’ in J Delbrück (ed) International Law of Cooperation and State Sovereignty: Proceedings of an International Symposium of the Kiel Wlather-Schücking—Institute of International Law, May 23–26, 2001 (Berlin, Duncker und Humblot), pp 107–62.
174. PETERSMANN, E-U (1991) ‘Violation Complaints and NVNI Complaints in Public International Trade Law’ 34 German Yearbook of International Law, pp 175–229.
175. PETERSMANN, E-U (1994) ‘The Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization and the Evolution of the GATT Dispute Settlement System since 1948’ 31 CML Rev, pp 1157–244.
176. PETERSMANN, E-U (1997a) The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
177. PETERSMANN, E-U (1997b) ‘International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System 1948–1996: An Introduction’ in E-U Petersmann (ed) International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
178. PETERSMANN, E-U (1998a) ‘How to Promote the International Rule of Law? Contributions by the WTO Appellate Review System’ in J Cameron and K Campbell (eds) Dispute Resolution in the WTO (London, Cameron May), pp 75–97.
179. PETERSMANN, E-U (1998b) ‘From Hobbesian International Law of Coexistance to Modern Integration Law: The WTO Dispute Settlement System’ 1(2) JIEL 1998, pp 175–98.
180. PETERSMANN, E-U (1999) ‘Dispute Settlement in International Economic Law—Lessons for Strengthening International Dispute Settlement in Non-Economic Areas’ 2(2) JIEL, pp 189–248.
181. PETERSMANN, E-U (2000) ‘The WTO Constitution and the Millenium Round’ in M Bronckers and R Quick (eds) New Directions in International Economic Law, Essays in Honor of John H Jackson (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 111–33.
182. PETERSMANN, E-U (2003) ‘Transatlantic Economic Disputes: The EU, the US, and the WTO’ in E-U Petersmann and MA Pollock (eds) Oxford International Economic Law Series, John H Jackson (ed) (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp 3–64.
183. RAGHAVAN, C (2001) ‘Developing Nations Reject Labour Issues in WTO’ in South North Development Monitor No. 4564 of 2 December 2001, available at Third World Network, http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/deb9-cn.htm (29 December 2005).
184. ROESSLER, F (1997) ‘The Concept of Nullification and Impairment in the Legal System of the World Trade Organization’ in E-U Petersmann (ed) International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Studies in Transnational Economic Law, Volume 11 (The Hague, Kluwer Law International), pp 125–42.
185. ROSENNE, S (1993) An International Law Miscellany (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
186. ROSENNE, S (1989) Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945–1986 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
187. RUB, A (1995) Hans Kelsens Völkerrechtslehre Versuch einer Würdigung (Zürich, Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag AG).
188. SAPIR, A (2001) ‘Who’s Afraid of Globalization? Domestic Adjustment in Europe and America’ in R Porter, P Sauvé, A Subramanian and AB Zampetti (eds) Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millenium (Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press), pp 179–201.
189. SCHACHTER, O (1991) International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).
190. SCHAFFER, G, Mosoti, V and Qureschi, A (2003) ‘Towards a Development-Supportive Dispute Settlement System in the WTO’ (ICTSD Series: Sustainable Development and Trade Issues), ICTSD Resource Paper No. 5, http://www.ictsd.org/pubs/ictsd_series/resource_papers/DSU_2003.pdf (21 December 2005).
191. SANDS, P (2000) ‘Vers une transformation du droit international’, Cours de l’HEI, Droit International 4 (Paris, Pedone).
192. SCHERMERS, HG (1980) International Institutional Law, 1 edn (Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff & Noordhoff).
193. SCHERMERS, HG and WALBROECK, DF (2001) Judicial Protection in the European Union, 6 edn (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
194. SCHWARZENBERGER, G (1955) ‘The Fundamental Principles of International Law’ in Academie de Droit International, Recueil des Cours, vol II 1955, 88, (Leiden, AW Sijthoff), pp 270–326.
195. SCOBBIE, IGM (1997) ‘The Theorist as Judge: Hersch Lauterpracht’s Concept of the International Judicial Function’ 8 EJIL, pp 264–98.
196. SENTI, R (2005) ‘Überlegungen zu Reformmöglichkeiten für die WTO, Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Handel, Gesundheit, Arbeit und Umwelt’ in Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Nr. 60 of 12–13 March 2005, http://nzz.gbi.de/webcgi?WID=27572-5570435-03066_2 (21 December 2005).
197. SINCLAIR, SIR I (1984) The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
198. SINCLAIR, SIR I (1996) ‘Estoppel and Acquiescence’ in V Lowe and M Fitzmaurice (eds) Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice, Essays in Honor of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge, Grotius Publications), pp 104–20.
199. SOETEMAN, A (1991) ‘Hercules aan het werk. Over de rol van rechtsbeginselen in het recht’ Rechtsbeginselen (Nijmegen, Ars Aequi), pp 41–56.
200. STEGER, DP (2001) ‘Appellate Body Jurisprudence Relating to Trade Remedies’ 35 Journal of World Trade, pp 799–823.
201. STEINBERG, RH (2003) ‘Judicial Law-Making, Internal Transparency, and External Transparency: Recent Institutional Developments at the WTO’ 37(1) The International Lawyer, p 56, available at: http://www.law.berkeley.edu/cenpro/ils/papers/steinbergwtO17.pdf (21 December 2005).
202. STERN, B (2000) ‘How to Regulate Globalization?’ in Michael Byers (ed) The Role of Law in International Politics, Essays in International Relations and International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp 247–68.
203. SUNSTEIN, CR and VERMEULE, A (2002) ‘Interpretation and Institutions’ (Chicago John M Olin Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 28), http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/resources/28.crs-av.interpretation.pdf; The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=320245 (22 December 2005).
204. SUTHERLAND, P (2000) ‘Is Free Trade Fair? Has it Gone Too Far?’ (Fellow’s Papers, Harvard University Weatherhead Center for International Affairs), http://www.wcfia. harvard.edu/fellows/papers/1999-00/sutherland.pdf (22 December 2005).
205. TARULLO, DK (2002) ‘The Hidden Costs of International Dispute Settlement: WTO Review of Domestic Anti-Dumping Decisions’ 34 Law and Policy of International Business, pp 109–81.
206. THIRLWAY, HWA (1996) ‘Procedural Law and the International Court of Justice’ in V Lowe and M Fitzmaurice (eds) Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice, Essays in Honor of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge, Grotius Publications), pp 389–405.
207. TRACHTMAN, J (2005) ‘Book Review, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law, by Joost Pauwelyn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003’ 98(4) AJIL, pp 855–61.
208. TRACHTMAN, J (1999) ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution’ 40 Harv Int’l LJ, pp 333–77.
209. TREBILCOCK, M and HOWSE, R (1999) The Regulation of International Trade, 2nd edn (London, Routledge).
210. UMBRICHT, GC (2001) ‘An “Amicus Curiae Brief” on Amicus Curiae Briefs at the WTO’ 4 JIEL, pp 773–94.
211. VAGTS, DF (1993) ‘Treaty Interpretation and the New American Ways of Law Reading’ 4 EJIL, pp 472–505.
212. VAGTS, DF (2004) ‘International Relations Look at Customary International Law: A Traditionalists Defence’ 15(5) EJIL, pp 1031–40.
213. VAN ALSTINE, MP (1998) ‘Dynamic Treaty Interpretation’ 146 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, pp 687–793.
214. VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P (2003) ‘The Doha Development Round Negotiations on the Dispute Settlement Understanding, DSU Negotiations’ (WTO Conference Paper, New Agendas in the 21st Century, Taipei, 28–29 November 2003), http://www.world tradelaw.net/articles/vandenbosschedohadsu.pdf, (22 December 2005).
215. VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P (2005) The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
216. VERHEIJ, B, HAGE, JC and VAN DEN HERIK, HJ (1998) ‘An Integrated View on Rules and Principles’ 6 Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp 3–26.
217. VERMULST, E and GRAAFSMA, F (2002) WTO Disputes, Anti-Dumping, Subsidies and Safeguards (London, Cameron May).
218. VIERDAG, EW (1996) ‘The International Court of Justice and the Law of Treaties’ in V Lowe and M Fitzmaurice (eds) Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice, Essays in Honor of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge, Grotius Publications), pp 145–65.
219. VILLIGER, ME (1997) Customary International Law and Treaties: A Manual on the Theory and Practice of the Interrelation of Sources, fully revised 2nd edn (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
220. VIRALLY, M (1990) Le droit international en devenir, Essais écrits au fil des ans, Publications de l’Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales Genève (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).
221. VON BOGDANDY, A (1992) ‘The NVNI Procedure of Article XXIII: 2 GATT, its Operational Rationale’ 26 Journal of World Trade, pp 95–111.
222. WAINCYMER, J (2002) WTO Litigation, Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute Settlement (London, Cameron May).
223. WÄLDE, T (1999) ‘Non-Conventional Views on “Effectiveness”: The Holy Grail of Modern International Lawyers: The New Paradigm? A Chimera? Or a Brave New World in the Global Economy?’ 4 Austrian Review of International and European Law, pp 164–203.
224. WEIL, P (1996) ‘L’équité dans la jurisprudence de la Cour Internationale de Justice, Un mystère en voie de dissipation?’ in V Lowe and M Fitzmaurice (eds) Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice, Essays in Honor of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge, Grotius Publications), pp 121–44.
225. WEILER, T (2005) ‘Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v Mexico’ in T Weiler (ed) International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases From the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London, Cameron May) chapter 19.
226. WHITE, G (1996) ‘The Principle of Good Faith’ in V Lowe and C Warbrick (eds) The United Nations and the Principles of International Law, Essays in Memory of Michael Akehurst (London, Routledge), pp 230–55.
227. WILSON, D and STARCHUK, L (2003) ‘Judicial Activism in the WTO—Implications for the Doha Negotiations’ in Johnston & Buchan LLP, Publications: International Trade, http://www.johnstonbuchan.com/pubs/trade/Judicial%20Activism%20in%20the%20WTO.pdf (22 December 2005).
228. WIRTH, DA (1998) ‘European Communities—Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products’ 92 AJIL, pp 755–9.
229. WOOD, DP (2003) ‘A US Perspective on Ducks’ in T Cottier and PC Mavroidis (eds) The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the
230. WTO, The World Trade Forum, vol 4 (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press), pp 119–31.
231. WTO Secretariat, WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice, 1st edn (2003) (Geneva and Lanham, MD, WTO Publications and Bernan).
232. ZEITLER, HE (2005) ‘“Good Faith” in the WTO Jurisprudence Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism?’ 8(3) JIEL, pp 721–58.
233. ZIEGLER, K-H (1997) ‘Aequitas in Roman International Law’ in AM Rabello (ed) Aequitas and Equity: Equity in Civil Law and Mixed Jurisdictions, Greene Fund for Equity Studies (Jerusalem, Hamaccabi Press (Jack)), pp 48–62.
234. ZIMMERMANN, TA (2004) What Direction Should the DSU Take? Negotiations and Proposals to Review and Reform the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (Bamberg, Difo-Druck).
235. ZOLLER, E (1977) La Bonne Foi en Droit International Public (Paris, Editions A Pedone).