WTO dispute settlement: The politics of procedure in Appellate Body rulings

World Trade Review

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 65-100

  Smith, James McCall ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019433102     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745603001356     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alter, K. J. (1998), ‘Who are the “Masters of the Treaty”?’, International Organization, 52(1): 121.
2. Alter, K. J. (2000), ‘The European Union’s Legal System and Domestic Policy: Spillover or Backlash?’, International Organization, 54(3): 489–518.
3. Barfield, C. (2001), Free Trade, Sovereignty, and Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization, Washington DC: AEI Press.
4. Behboodi, R. (2000), ‘“Should” Means “Shall”: A Critical Analysis of the Obligation to Submit Information under Article 13.1 of the DSU in the Canada–Aircraft Case’, Journal of International Economic Law, 3(4): 563–592.
5. Bhala, R. (1999a), ‘The Myth about Stare Decisis and International Trade Law’, American University International Law Review, 14:845.
6. Bhala, R. (1999b), ‘The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication’, Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 1.
7. Busch, M. L. and E. Reinhardt (2002), ‘Transatlantic Trade Conflicts and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’, Unpublished manuscript, Queen’s University and Emory University.
8. Cooter, R. D. and T. Ginsburg (1996), ‘Comparative Judicial Discretion’, International Review of Law and Economics, 16: 295–313.
9. Downs, G. W. and D. M. Rocke (1995), Optimal Imperfection? Domestic Uncertainty and Institutions in International Relations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Esserman, S. and R. Howse (2003), ‘The WTO on Trial’, Foreign Affairs, 82: 130–140.
11. Ferejohn, J. and C. Shipan (1990), ‘Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 6: 1–20.
12. Garrett, G., R. D. Kelemen, and H. Schulz (1998), ‘The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union’, International Organization, 52(1): 149–176.
13. Garrett, G. and J. M. Smith (2000), ‘The Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement’, Unpublished manuscript, Yale University and George Washington University.
14. Goldstein, J. and L. L. Martin (2000), ‘Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note’, International Organization, 54(3): 603–632.
15. Howse, R. (2000), ‘Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence’, in J. H. H. Weiler (eds.), The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade?, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–70.
16. Hudec, R. E. (1993), Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System, Salem, New Hampshire: Butterworth.
17. Hudec, R. E. (1998), ‘The Role of the GATT Secretariat in the Evolution of the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure’, in J. Bhagwati and M. Hirsch (eds.), The Uruguay Round and Beyond: Essays in Honor of Arthur Dunkel, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 101–120.
18. Hudec, R. E. (1999), ‘The New WTO Dispute Settlement Procedure: An Overview of the First Three Years’, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 8(Winter): 1–53.
19. Hurd, I. (1999), ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, International Organization, 53(2): 379.
20. Hurd, I. (2002), ‘Legitimacy, Power and the Symbolic Life of the UN Security Council’, Global Governance, 8(1): 35–52.
21. Joergens, K.J. (1999), ‘True Appellate Procedure or only a Two-Stage Process? A Comparative View of the Appellate Body under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding’, Law and Policy in International Business, 30(Winter): 193–229.
22. Kelemen, R. D. (2001), ‘The Limits of Judicial Power: Trade–Environment Disputes in the GATT/WTO and the EU’, Comparative Political Studies, 34: 622–650.
23. Mavroidis, P. C., H. Nordström, and H. Horn (1999), ‘Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?’, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 2340
24. (December). Palmeter, D. (1998), ‘The WTO Appellate Body Needs Remand Authority’, Journal of World Trade, 32: 41.
25. Pauwelyn, J. (2001), ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’, American Journal of International Law, 95: 535–578.
26. Rangaswami, V. (2000), ‘Operation of the Appellate Process and Functions, Including the Appellate Body’, Law and Policy in International Business 31(3): 701–704.
27. Shoyer, A. W. and E. M. Solovy (2000), ‘The Process and Procedure of Litigating at the World Trade Organization: A Review of the Work of the Appellate Body’, Law and Policy in International Business, 31(3): 677–695.
28. Smith, J. M. (Forthcoming), ‘Inequality in International Trade? Developing Countries and Institutional Change in WTO Dispute Settlement’, Review of International Political Economy.
29. Stokes, B. and P. Choate (2001), ‘Democratizing US Trade Policy’, Council on Foreign Relations Paper, New York.
30. Walker, T., L. Epstein, and W. J. Dixon (1988), ‘On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court’, Journal of Politics, 50(May): 361–389.
31. Wolff, A. W. (2001), ‘Problems with WTO Dispute Settlement’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 2(Fall): 417–426.
32. WTO (1995), The WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: A Collection of the Legal Texts, Geneva: World Trade Organization.