Systems Pluralism and Institutional Pluralism in Constitutional Law: National, Supranational and Global Governance

Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 85-126

  Halberstam, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194848947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (120)

1. S Cassese et al (eds), Global Administrative Law: Cases, Materials, Issues 2nd edn (New York, IILJ, 2008)
2. RB Stewart, ‘U.S. Administrative Law: A Model for Global Administrative Law?’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 63
3. DC Esty, ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal 1490.
4. C Tomuschat, ‘International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century, General Course on Public International Law’ (1999) 281 Recueil des Cours 9
5. H Mosler, The International Society as a Legal Community (Alphen aan den Rijn, Sijthoff, 1980)
6. B Fassbender, The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).
7. EA Posner, JL Goldsmith, The Limits of International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005)
8. J Yoo, The Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2005)
9. CA Bradley, ‘International Delegations, the Structural Constitution, and Non-Self-Execution’ (2003) 55 Stanford Law Review 1557.
10. G Teubner, ‘Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society’ in G Teubner (ed), Global Law Without a State (Aldershot, Dartmouth, 1997) 3.
11. H Mohnhaupt, ‘Verfassung I’ in R Koselleck et al (eds), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (Stuttgart, Klett, 1990) 831, 833–36.
12. H Brunkhorst, Solidarität: Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 2002) 46
13. H Arendt, On Revolution (New York, Penguin Books, 2006) 190.
14. JR Tanner, Constitutional Documents of the Reign of James I: AD 1603–1625 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, reprint 1961) 260
15. G Stourzh, From Vienna to Chicago and Back: Essays on Intellectual History and Political Thought in Europe and America (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2007) 90.
16. SR Gardiner (ed), The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625–1660 3rd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1906) 372.
17. B Bailyn, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1967) 95.
18. C Mollers, ‘Verfassungsgebende Gewalt–Verfassung–Konstitutoinalisierung’ in A von Bogdandy (ed), Europäisches Verfassungsrecht: Theoretische und dogmatische Grundzüge (Berlin, Springer, 2002).
19. M Rosenfeld, The Identity of the Constitutional Subject: Selfhood, Citizenship, Culture, and Community (London and New York, Routledge, 2010) 164.
20. D Grimm, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte 1776–1866 (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1988) 113–16.
21. P Laband, Das Staatsrecht des Deutschen Reiches (Tubingen, JCB Mohr, 1911) 55–102.
22. PC Caldwell, Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism (Durham, Duke University Press, 1997).
23. J Bodin, On Sovereignty: Four Chapters From Six Books of the Commonwealth (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992) 18.
24. S Holmes, Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1995) 109–31.
25. T Paine, The Rights of Man (London, Watts & Co, 1937) 36.
26. D Grimm, ‘The Achievement of Constitutionalism and its Prospects in a Changing World’ in P Dobner and M Loughlin (eds), The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010) 3
27. N Luhmann, ‘Verfassung als evolutionare Errungenschaft’ (1990) 9 Rechtshistorisches Journal 176.
28. B Friedman, ‘The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five’ (2002) 112 Yale Law Journal 153.
29. A Stone Sweet, The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992).
30. A Stone Sweet, ‘The Politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 69, 74–75.
31. A Stone Sweet, ‘Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review: And Why It May Not Matter’ (2003) 101 Michigan Law Review 2744, 2779.
32. T Hartley, ‘International Law and the Law of the European Union’ (2001) 72 British Yearbook of International Law 1.
33. E Wicks, ‘A New Constitution for a New State? The 1707 Union of England and Scotland’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review 109, 114
34. R Wahl, ‘In Defense of “Constitution”’, in P Dobner and M Loughlin (eds), n 28 at 220.
35. O Beaud, Théorie de la Fédération (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2007)
36. C Schonberger, Unionsbürger (Tubingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2006)
37. R Schutze, From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).
38. S Gardbaum, ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’ (2001) 49 American Journal of Comparative Law 707.
39. Kumm, M, ‘Beyond Golf Clubs and the Judicialization of Politics: Why Europe Has a Constitution Properly So Called’ (2006) 54 American Journal of Comparative Law 54
40. D Halberstam, ‘Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Marbury and Van Gend’, http://ssrn.com/abstract=110325.
41. MP Maduro and L Azuolai (eds), The Past and the Future of EU Law: Revisiting the Classics on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2010).
42. B de Witte, ‘European Treaty Revision: A Case of Multilevel Constitutionalism’ in I Pernice and J Zemanek (eds), A Constitution for Europe: The IGC, the Ratification Process and Beyond (Baden Baden, Nomos, 2005)
43. I Pernice, ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited?’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review 703, 750
44. I Pernice, F Mayer, ‘De la constitution composee de l’Europe’ (2000) 36 Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen 623, 648
45. J Ziller, ‘L’Elargissement Change-t-il les Donnees du Probleme?’ in J Ziller et al, L’Européanisation des Droits Constitutionnels à la Lumière de la Constitution pour l’Europe (Paris, l’Harmattan, 2003) 311, 315.
46. D Halberstam, ‘Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States’ in JL Dunoff, JP Trachtman (eds), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009) 326.
47. D Dinan, Ever Closer Union (Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishing, 1999)
48. G Majone, ‘Regulatory Legitimacy’ in G Majone (ed), Regulating Europe (London, Routledge, 1996) 284–301.
49. J-V Louis, ‘National Parliaments and the Principle of Subsidiarity–Legal Options and Practical Limits’ (2008) 4 European Constitutional Law Review 429.
50. K van Kersbergen and B Verbeek, ‘Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance in the European Union’ (2004) 2 Comparative European Politics 142.
51. A von Bogdandy, ‘Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: On the Relationship between International and Domestic Constitutional Law’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 397.
52. H Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre (Wien, Osterreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1960) 328–43.
53. G de Burca, ‘The Constitutional Challenge of New Governance in the European Union’ (2003) 28 European Law Review 814, 817.
54. H Kelsen in Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (K Ringhofer and R Walter, eds, Wien, Manz, 1979) 169, 330
55. J Kammerhoffer, ‘Kelsen–Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law’ 22 (2009) Leiden Journal of International Law 225.
56. JL Goldsmith and EA Posner, n 3;
57. J Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832) in WE Rumble (ed) (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995) 171
58. T Hobbes, ‘Leviathan’ (1651) in CB Macpherson (ed) (New York, Penguin, 1981) 189–217.
59. HLA Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994) 236–37.
60. Y Shany, The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003) 86–94.
61. B Simma, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interests in International Law’ in Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law (1994) 234, 250.
62. RJ Dupuy, La communauté internationale entre le mythe et l’histoire (Economica, Unesco, 1986) 160, 180
63. S Gardbaum, ‘Human Rights as International Constitutional Rights’ (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 749, 762.
64. M Koskenniemi, ‘The Pull of the Mainstream’ (1990) 88 Michigan Law Review 1946, 1954.
65. M Noortmann, Enforcing International Law: From Self-Help to Self-Contained Regimes (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2005) 141.
66. KA Nicolaidis and R Howse, ‘Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why a Constitution for the WTO is a Step Too Far?’ in R Porter et al (eds), Equity, Efficiency and Legitimacy: The Multilateral System at the Millennium (Washington DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2001).
67. B Simma, ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ (1985) XVI Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 111, 128–9.
68. N MacCormick, Questioning Sovereignty (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999).
69. D Halberstam, ‘Local, Global, and Plural Constitutionalism: Europe Meets the World’ in G de Burca and JHH Weiler (eds), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (forthcoming), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1521016.
70. G Teubner, Recht als Autopoietisches System (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1989) at 30.
71. M Tushnet, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2000) 53.
72. SH Cleveland, ‘Our International Constitution’ (2006) 31 Yale Journal of International Law 1, 13.
73. A Nollenkaemper, ‘The Direct Effect of Public International Law’ in JM Prinssen and A Schrauwen (eds), Direct Effect: Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2002) 157–80
74. A Nollenkaemper, ‘The Direct Effect of Public International Law’ in JM Prinssen and A Schrauwen (eds), Direct Effect: Rethinking a Classic of EC Legal Doctrine (Groningen, Europa Law Publishing, 2002) 157–80
75. R Schutze, ‘On “Middle Ground”: The European Community and Public International Law’ in S Muller and M Louth (eds), Highest Courts and the Internationalisation of Law: Challenges and Changes (The Hague, Hague Academic Press, 2009) 35–73.
76. D Halberstam and E Stein, ‘The United Nations, the European Union, and the King of Sweden: Economic Sanctions and Individual Rights in a Plural World Order’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review 1, 14–18, 54–56.
77. J Raz, Between Authority and Interpretation: On the Theory of Law and Practical Reason (Oxford, Oxford University Press 2009) 143.
78. E Benvenisti, ‘Exit and Voice in the Age of Globalization’ (1999) 98 Michigan Law Review 167.
79. D Held, Democracy and the Global Order (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1995) 21.
80. FW Scharpf, Governing in Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999)
81. I Shapiro, The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2005) 109–10, 149
82. G Tsebelis, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work (New York, Russel Sage Foundation, 2002)
83. R Hirschl, Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2004).
84. S Holmes, ‘Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy’ in J Elster and R Slagstad (eds), Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1995) 134.
85. RM Cover, ‘The Uses of Jurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology, and Innovation’ (1980) 22 William and Mary Law Review 639.
86. K Wissenbach, ‘Systemwechsel im europaischen Kartellrecht: Dezentralisierte Rechtsanwendung in transnationalen Wettbewerbsbeziehungen durch die VO 1/03’ (2005) 36 Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht 1.
87. EF McGarrell et al, ‘Project Safe Neighborhoods–A National Program to Reduce Gun Crime: Final Project Report’ (2009), available at http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/226686.pdf.
88. M Koskenniemi and P Leino, ‘Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 553.
89. K Lenaerts and M Desomer, ‘Towards a Hierarchy of Legal Acts in the European Union? Simplification of Legal Instruments and Procedures’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal 744, 764.
90. B de Witte, ‘Legal Instruments and Law Making in the Lisbon Treaty’ in S Griller and J Ziller (eds), The Lisbon Treaty: EU Constitutionalism without a Constitutional Treaty? (Vienna and New York, Springer, 2008) 79.
91. H Kelsen, Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit, Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung deutscher Staatsrechtslehrer (1929) at 30.
92. S Lebitsch-Buchsteiner, Die Bundesstaatliche Rücksichtnahmepflicht (Vienna, Braumuller, 2001).
93. E Cannizzaro, ‘Interconnecting International Jurisdictions: A Contribution from the Genocide Decision of the ICJ’ (2007) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 1.
94. S Levinson, ‘Looking at the Constitution: Could Meese Be Right This Time?’ (1986) 243 The Nation 689.
95. MS Paulsen, ‘The Most Dangerous Branch: Executive Power to Say What the Law Is’ (1994) 83 Georgetown Law Journal 217, 240.
96. HL Trefousse, Andrew Johnson: A Biography (New York, Norton, 1989) 311–29.
97. ED Katz, ‘From Bush v Gore to NAMUDNO: A Response to Professor Amar’ (2009) 61 Florida Law Review 991.
98. A Lincoln, ‘Message to Congress in Special Session (July 4, 1861)’, in RP Basler (ed), The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln (New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press, 1953) 421, 429–30
99. R Fallon, ‘Executive Power and the Political Constitution’ (2007) Utah Law Review 1, 8 (ultimately arguing against the legality of such action).
100. C Schmitt, Der Hüter der Verfassung (Tubingen, Mohr, 1931).
101. H Kelsen, ‘Wer soll der Huter der Verfassung sein?’ (1930–31) Die Justiz 576, 577.
102. Madison, ‘The Federalist No 49’ in JE Cooke (ed) (Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press, 1961) 339.
103. LH Tribe, American Constitutional Law (New York, Foundation Press, 1978) 33.
104. SE Fish, ‘Interpreting the Variorum’ (1976) 2 Critical Inquiry 465, 483–85.
105. C Taylor, Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Philosophical Papers 2 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985) 34–40.
106. D Gauthier, ‘The Social Contract as Ideology’ (1977) 6 Philosophy and Public Affairs 130.
107. S J Shapiro, Legality (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2010).
108. K Niclaus, ‘Der Parlamentarische Rat und das Bundesverfassungsgericht’ in RC van Ooyen and MHW Mollers (eds), Das Bundsverfassungsgericht im Politischen System (Wiesbaden, VS Verlag, 2006) 117.
109. G Vanberg, The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2005) 67–77, 126–28, 143–66
110. C Landfried, Parteifinanzen und Politische Macht (Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1994, 2nd edn) 78–84.
111. KE Whittington, Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1999).
112. A Benz, ‘From Joint Decision Traps to Over-Regulated Federalism: Adverse Effects of a Successful Constitutional Reform’ (2008) 17 German Politics 440
113. AB Gunlicks, ‘German Federalism and Recent Reform Efforts’ (2005) 6 German Law Journal 1283
114. D Heinz, ‘Federal Reform II in Germany’ (2010) 2 Perspectives on Federalism;
115. C Moore et al, ‘German Federalism in Transition?’ (2008) 17 German Politics 393.
116. SG Calabresi, J Lindgren, ‘Term Limits for the Supreme Court: Life Tenure Reconsidered’ (2006) 29 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 770, 771.
117. D Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (New York, Duke University Press, 1997), 22
118. GM Sierck, C Sinnokrot, Die Wahl von Richtern des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Deutscher Bundestag Wissenschaftliche Dienste), available at http://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/analysen/2006/Die_Wahl_von_Richtern_des_Bundesverfassungsgerichts.pdf
119. C Landfried, Bundesverfassungsgericht und Gesetzgeber 2nd edn (Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1996) 15–22.
120. V Curran, ‘Racism’s Past and Law’s Future’ (2004) 28 Vermont Law Review 683.