French Dislocation: Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition

French Dislocation: Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 1-295

  de Cat, Cécile ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85194127444     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199230471.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (269)

1. ALEXOPOULOU, T., DORON, E., and HEYCOCK, C. (2004). 'Broad Subjects and Clitic Left Dislocation'. In Adger, D., De Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G., editors, Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 329-58.
2. ALLEN, G. D. (1983). 'Some suprasegmental contours in French two-year-old children's speech'. Phonetica 40: 269-92.
3. ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, E. (1997). 'Clitic Left Dislocation and Contrastive Left Dislocation'. In Anagnostopoulou, E., van Riemsdijk, H., and Zwarts, F., editors, Materials on Left Dislocation. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 151-192.
4. AOUN, J. and BENMAMOUN, E. (1998). 'Minimality, reconstruction, and PF movement'. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 569-97.
5. ASHBY, W. (1988). 'The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of Left- and Right- Dislocations in French'. Lingua 75: 203-29.
6. ASHBY, W. J. (1994). 'An acoustic profile of Right-Dislocations in French'. Journal of French Language Studies 4: 127-45.
7. AUGER, J. (1993). 'More evidence for verbal agreement-marking in colloquial French. In Ashby, W., Mithun, M., Perissinotto, G., and Raposo, E., editors, Linguistic perspectives on Romance languages. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 177-98.
8. AUGER, J. (1994). Pronominal Clitics in Québec Colloquial French: A Morphological Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
9. AUSTIN, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
10. AVRUTIN, S. (1999). Development of the Syntax-Discourse Interface. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
11. BAKER, M. (1996). The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford University Press: New York.
12. BAKER, N. and GREENFIELD, P. (1988). 'The development of new and old information in young children's early language. Language Sciences 10: 3-34.
13. BARBOSA, P. (2000). 'Clitics: a window into the null subject property. In Costa, J., editor, Portuguese Syntax: New Comparative Studies. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 31-93.
14. BARNES, B. (1985). The pragmatics of Left detachment in spoken standard French, Pragmatics & Beyond, vol. VI.3. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
15. BARTON, E. (1990). Nonsentential Constituents: A Theory of Grammatical Structure and Pragmatic Interpretation. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
16. BAUCHE, H. (1926). Le langage populaire. Payot: Paris.
17. BEERMAN, D., LEBLANC, D., and VAN RIEMSDIJK, H., editors (1997). Rightward movement. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
18. BELLETTI, A. (1999). 'Italian/Romance clitics: Structure and derivation. In van Riemsdijk, H., editor, Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin. 543-80.
19. BELLETTI, A. (2001). 'Aspects of the low IP area'. In Rizzi, L., editor, The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, vol. 2. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 16-51.
20. BENINCA, P. (2001). 'The position of topic and focus in the left periphery'. In Cinque, G. and Salvi, G., editors, Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi. Elsevier: Amsterdam. 39-64.
21. BEVER, T., FODOR, J., and WEKSEL, W. (1971). 'Theoretical notes on the acquisition of syntax: a critique of "contextual generalization" '. In Bar-Adon, A. and Leopold, W., editors, Child Language: A Book of Readings. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
22. BLANCHE-BENVENISTE, C. (1997). Approches de la langue parlée en français: L'essentiel français. Ophrys: Paris.
23. BLASCO, M. (1993). Les énoncés à 'redoublement' et 'dislocation' en français contemporain: Analyse en 'double marquage'. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Provence.
24. BLOOM, L. (1970). Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
25. BOECKX, C. A. (2003). Islands and Chains: Resumption as Stranding. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
26. BOHNACKER, U. (1998). Icelandic plus English: Language differentiation and functional categories in a successively bilingual child. Doctoral dissertation, University of Durham.
27. BOTTARI, P., CIPRIANI, P., and CHILOSI, A. (1992). 'Proto-syntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology'. Geneva Generative Papers. 1-2: 83-101.
28. BRESNAN, J. and MCHOMBO, S. (1987). 'Topic, pronoun, and agreement in ChicheWa'. Language 63: 741-82.
29. BROWN, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
30. BüRING, D. (1999). 'Topic'. In Bosch, P. and van der Sandt, R., editors, Focus. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
31. CADIOT, P. (1992). 'Matching syntax and pragmatics: A typology of topic and topic- related constructions in spoken French'. Linguistics 30: 57-88.
32. CAMPION, E. (1984). Left Dislocation in Montreal French. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
33. CANN, R., KEMPSON, R., MARTEN, L., OTSUKA, M., and SWINBURNE, D. (2004). 'On the Left and On the Right'. In Adger, D., De Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G., editors, Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 19-47.
34. CARLSON, G. (1977). Reference to Kinds in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachussets.
35. CARROLL, S. (1982). 'Les dislocations ne sont pas si populaires que ça'. In Lefebvre, C., editor, La syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire: approches formelle et fonctionnelle. Gouvernement du Québec, Office de la langue française: Québec. 211-46.
36. CECCHETTO, C. (1999). 'A comparative analysis of Left and Right Dislocation in Romance'. Studia Linguistica 53: 40-67.
37. CECCHETTO, C. (2000). 'Doubling structures and reconstruction'. Probus 12: 93-126
38. CHIERCHIA, G. (1995). 'Individual Level Predicates as inherent generics'. In Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J., editors, The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. 175-223.
39. CHOMSKY, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Semantics. Cambridge Univesity Press: Cambridge. 183-216.
40. CHOMSKY, N. (1971). 'Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and semantic interpretation'. In Steinberg, D. and Jacobovits, L., editors, Semantics. Cambridge Univesity Press: Cambridge. 183-216
41. CHOMSKY, N. (1977). 'On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T., and Akmajian, A., editors, Formal Syntax. Academic Press: New York. 71-132.
42. CHOMSKY, N. (1986). Barriers. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
43. CHOMSKY, N. (1993). 'A minimalist program for linguistic theory'. In Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J., editors, The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. 1-52.
44. CHOMSKY, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
45. CINQUE, G. (1977). 'The movement nature of Left Dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397-412.
46. CINQUE, G. (1983). ' "Topic" constructions in some European languages and "connectedness" . In Ehlich, K. and van Riemsdijk, H., editors, Connectedness in Sentence Text and Discourse. KBU: Tilburg. 7-42.
47. CINQUE, G. (1990). Types ofA-bar dependencies. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
48. CINQUE, G. (1993). 'A null theory of phrase and compound stress'. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239-97.
49. CONTRERAS, H. (2004). Topic as an interpretive notion. Paper presented at the Lisbon workshop on alternative views on the functional domain.
50. COTE, M.-H. (1999). Issues in the analysis and acquisition of clitics in (Spoken) French. Manuscript, MIT.
51. COTE, M.-H. (2001). 'On the status of the subject clitics in child French. In Almgren, M., Barrena, A., Ezeizabarrena, M.-J., Idiazabal, I., and MacWhinney, B., editors, Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the IASCL. Cascadilla Press: Somerville, MA. 1314-30.
52. CRISMA, P. (1992). 'On the acquisition of wh-questions in French. Geneva Generative Papers 1-2:115-22.
53. CRYSTAL, D. (1973). 'Non-segmental phonology in language acquisition: a review of the issues . Lingua 32:1-45.
54. CRYSTAL, D. (1986). 'Prosodic development. In Fletcher, P. and Garman, M., editors, Studies in First Language Development. Cambridge University Press: New York. 174-97.
55. CULICOVER, P. and JACKENDOFF, R. (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
56. CUMMINS, S. and ROBERGE, Y. (1994). 'A morphosyntactic analysis of Romance clitic constructions'. In Mazzola, M. L., editor, Issues and theory in Romance linguistics. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC. 239-57.
57. CUMMINS, S. and ROBERGE, Y. (2004). 'Null objects in French and English'. In Auger, J., Clements, J. C., and Vance, B., editors, Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 121-38.
58. CUMMINS, S. and ROBERGE, Y. (2005). 'A modular account of null objects in French'. Syntax 8: 44-64.
59. DE CAT, C. (2000). 'Towards a unified analysis of French floating quantifiers'. Journal of French Language Studies 10: 1-25.
60. DE CAT, C. (2002). French Dislocation. Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
61. DE CAT, C. (2004a). 'Apparent non-nominative subjects in L1 French'. In Prévost, P. and Paradis, J., editors, The Acquisition of French in Different Contexts: Focus on Functional Categories. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 60-115.
62. DE CAT, C. (2004b). 'A fresh look at how young children encode new referents. International Review ofApplied Linguistics 42: 111-27.
63. DE CAT, C. (2005). 'French subject clitics are not agreement morphemes. Lingua 115: 1195-219.
64. DE CAT, C. (2006). 'Do Root Infinitives ever have an overt subject in child French?' In Unsworth, S., Parodi, T., Sorace, A., and Young-Scholten, M., editors, Paths of development in Li and L2 acquisition. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 55-76.
65. DE CAT, C. (in press). 'French dislocation without movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
66. DE CAT, C. and TSOULAS, G. (2006). Complex fragments. Manuscript, University of Leeds and University of York.
67. DE VILLIERS, J. (1991). 'Why questions?' In Maxfield, T. and Plunkett, B., editors, Papers in the Acquisition of WH. UMOP: University of Massachussets, Amherst. 155-73.
68. DELAIS-ROUSSARIE, E., DOETJES, J., and SLEEMAN, P. (2004). 'Dislocation. In Corblin, F. and de Swart, H., editors, Handbook of French Semantics. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA. 501-28.
69. DEPREZ, V. and PIERCE, A. (1993). 'Negation and functional projections in early grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 25-67.
70. DESHAIES, O., GUILBAULT, C., and PARADIS, C. (1993). 'Prosodie et dislocation à gauche par anaphore en français québécois spontané'. In Crochetière, A., Boulanger, J.-C., and Ouellon, C., editors, Actes du XVe Congrès international des linguistes vol. II. P.U.L.: Québec. 31-4.
71. DIESING, M. (1989). 'Bare plural subjects, inflection, and the mapping to LF'. In Bach, F., Kratzer, A., and Partee, B. H., editors, Papers on Quantification. University of Massachussets: Amherst.
72. DIESING, M. (1992). Indefinites. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
73. DORE, J. (1975). 'Holophrases, speech acts and language universals'. Journal of Child Language 2: 21-40.
74. Kiss, K. (1995). 'Introduction'. In é. Kiss, K., editor, Discourse configurational languages. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 3-28.
75. Kiss, K. (1998). 'Identificational focus versus information focus'. Language 74: 245-73.
76. EMONDS, J. (1970). Root and structure-preserving transformations. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
77. EMONDS, J. (1979). 'Appositive relatives have no properties'. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 211-43.
78. EMONDS, J. (2000). Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
79. EMONDS, J. (2001). 'La relation entre la dislocation à droite et le clitique franco-italien enne'. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan 119:1-32.
80. EMONDS, J. (2004). 'Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions'. In Adger, O., De Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G., editors, Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 75-120.
81. EMSLIE, H. and STEVENSON, R. (1981). 'Pre-school children's use of the articles in definite and indefinite referring expressions'. Journal of Child Language 8: 313-28.
82. ERTESCHIK-SHIR, N. (1986). 'Wh-questions and focus'. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 117-49.
83. ERTESCHIK-SHIR, N. (1997). The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
84. ESCOBAR, L. (1997). 'Clitic Left Dislocation and other relatives'. In Anagnostopoulou, E., van Riemsdijk, H., and Zwarts, F., editors, Materials on Left Dislocation, vol. 14. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 233-74.
85. FERDinand, A. (1993). 'Subject dislocations in French child language'. HIL Manuscripts: 54-64.
86. FERDINAND, A. (1996). The Development of Functional Categories: The Acquisition of the Subject in French, Holland Academic Graphics: The Hague.
87. FIRBAS, J. (1964). 'On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis'. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1: 267-80.
88. FIRBAS, J. (1975). 'On the thematic and non-thematic section of the sentence. Style and Text. 314-34.
89. FRASCARELLI, M. (2000). The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
90. FRASCARELLI, M. (2002). Topicalization as Merge. A comparative analysis of Left and Right Dislocation in Italian. Manuscript, Università degli Studi Roma Tre.
91. FRASCARELLI, M. (2004). 'Dislocation, clitic resumption and minimality'. In Bok-Bennema, R., Hollebrandse, B., Kampers-Manhe, B., and Sleeman, P., editors, Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 99-118.
92. FREI, H. (1929). La grammaire des fautes. Geuthner: Paris.
93. FRIEDEMANN, M.-A. (1992). 'The underlying position of external arguments in French'. Geneva Generative Papers 1-2: 123-44.
94. GADET, F. (1989). Le français ordinaire. Armand Colin: Paris.
95. GADET, F. (1998). 'Le "français avancé" à l'épreuve de ses données. In Bilger, M., van den Eynde, K., and Gadet, F., editors, Analyse linguistique et approches de l'oral: recueil d'études offert en hommage à Claire Blanche-Belveniste. Peeters: Paris. 59-68.
96. GADET, F. (2000). 'Des corpus pour ne...pas'. In Bilger, M., editor, Corpus: méthodologie et applications linguistiques, Champion: Paris. 156-67.
97. GILL, K.-H. and TSOULAS, G. (2004). 'Peripheral effects without peripheral syntax. In Adger, D., De Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G., editors, Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 121-41.
98. GINZBURG, J. and SAG, I. (2000). Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning and use of English interrogatives. CSLI: Stanford, CA.
99. GIVöN, T. (1976). 'Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Li, C., editor, Subject and Topic. Academic Press: New York. 149-211.
100. GODARD, D. (2004). 'French negative dependency. In Corblin, F. and de Swart, H., editors, Handbook of French semantics. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA.
101. GREENFIELD, P., REILLY, J., LEAPER, C., and BAKER, N. (1985). 'The structural and functional status of single-word utterances and their relationship to early multiword speech. In Barrett, M., editor, Children's single-word speech. Wiley: New York. 233-67.
102. GROBET, A. (2000). L'identification des topiques dans les dialogues. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Genève.
103. GROHMANN, K. (2000). 'Copy Left Dislocation. In Billerey and Lillehaugen, editors, Proceedings ofWCCFL 19. Cascadilla Press: Somerville, MA. 139-52.
104. GROHMANN, K. (2003). Prolific Domains: On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
105. GRUBER, J. (1967). 'Topicalisation in child language. Foundations of Language 3: 37-65.
106. GUILBAULT, C. (1993). 'Dislocation à gauche et prosodie en québécois spontané. Dialangue 4: 34-8.
107. GUNDEL, J. (1974). The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
108. CuNDEL, J. (1975). 'Left Dislocation and the role of topic-comment structures in linguistic theory'. OSU WPL 18: 72-131.
109. HAEGEMAN, L. (2002). 'Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP' Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2:117-80.
110. HAEGEMAN, L. (2003). The syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicali- sation. Manuscript, Université Charles de Caulle, Lille III.
111. HALLE, M. and MARANTZ, A. (1993). 'Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Halle, K. and Keyser, S., editors, The View from Building 20. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. 111-76.
112. HALLIDAY, M. A. K. (1967). 'Notes on transitivity and theme in English II'. Journal of Linguistics 3:199-244.
113. HAMANN, C. (2002). From Syntax to Discourse. Pronominal Clitics, Null Subjects and Infinitives in Child Language, Kluwer: Dordrecht.
114. HAMANN, C., RIZZI, L., and FRAUENFELDER, U. H. (1996). 'On the acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In Clahsen, H., editor, Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition: Empirical Findings, Theoretical Considerations and Crosslinguistic Comparisons. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 309-34.
115. HANKAMER, J. (1979). Deletion in coordinate structures. Garland: New York.
116. HASPELMATH, M. (2006). 'Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25-70.
117. HEIM, I. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachussets.
118. HEIM, I. (1983). 'File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In Baüerle, R., Schwarze, C., and von Stechow, A., editors, Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. de Gruyter: Berlin. 164-89.
119. HEYCOCK, C. (2006). 'Embedded root phenomena. In Everaert, M. and van Riemsdijk, H., editors, The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. II. Blackwell: Oxford. 174-209.
120. HEYCOCK, C. and KROCH, A. (1999). 'Pseudocleft connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 365-97.
121. HEYD, S. and MATHIEU, E. (2005). The semantics of [de N] structures, incorporation and referential intentions. Talk presented at the Brussels International Conference on Indefinites and Weak Quantifiers.
122. HICKMANN, M. (1982). The development of narrative skills: Pragmatic and metapragmatic aspects of discourse cohesion. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
123. HICKMANN, M. (2003). Children's discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
124. HIGGINS, R. (1973). 'On J. Emonds's analysis of extraposition. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 2. Academic Press: New York. 149-95.
125. HIRSCHBüHLER, P. (1974). 'La dislocation à gauche comme construction basique en français. In Rohrer, C. and Ruwet, N., editors, Colloque franco-allemand de grammaire transformationnelle, vol. 1. Tübingen.
126. HIRSCHBüHLER, P. (1975). 'On the source of lefthand NPs in French. Linguistic Inquiry 6: 155-65.
127. HOEKSTRA, E. (1991). Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics (GroDiL), Groningen.
128. HOEKSTRA, T. and JORDENS, P. (1994). 'From adjunct to head'. In Hoekstra, T. and Schwartz, B., editors, Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 119-49.
129. HOOPER, J. B. and THOMPSON, S. A. (1973). 'On the applicability of root transformations'. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465-97.
130. HULK, A. (1986). 'Subject clitics and the pro-drop parameter'. In Coopmans, P., Bordelois, I., and Dotson-Smith, B., editors, Going Romance: Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar II. Foris: Dordrecht. 107-20.
131. HULK, A. (1995). 'L'acquisition du sujet en français'. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 24: 33-55.
132. HULK, A. (1996a). 'The delay of inversion questions in the acquisition of French. In Parodi, C., Quicoli, C., Saltarelli, M., and Zubizarreta Maria, L., editors, Aspects of Romance Linguistics. Georgetown Washington, DC. 241-52.
133. HULK, A. (1996b). 'The syntax of wh-questions in child French'. In Philip, W. and Wijnen, F., editors, Connecting Children's Language and Linguistic Theory, Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development, vol. 5. Institute for General Linguistics, University of Amsterdam: Amsterdam. 123-72.
134. HYAMS, N. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Reidel: Dordrecht.
135. IATRIDOU, S. (1995). 'Clitics and islands effects'. In Izvorski, R. and Tredinnick, V., editors, U.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics. 2:11-30.
136. JAEGGLI, O. (1982). Topics in Romance Syntax. Foris: Dordrecht.
137. JAKUBOWICZ, C., NASH, L., RIGAUT, C., and GERARD, C. L. (1998). 'Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI '. Language Acquisition 7: 113-60.
138. JäGER, G. (2001). 'Topic-comment structure and the contrast between Stage Level and Individual Level Predicates '. Journal of Semantics 18: 83-126.
139. KADMON, N. (2001). Formal Pragmatics. Blackwell: Oxford.
140. KAISER, G. (1994). 'More about Inflection: The acquisition of clitic pronouns in French'. In Meisel, J., editor, Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
141. KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. (1981). 'The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In Deutsch, W., editor, The Child's Construction of Language. Academic Press: London. 121-47.
142. KAYNE, R. (1975). The Transformational Cycle. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
143. KAYNE, R. (1984). 'Binding, quantifiers, clitics and control, In Kayne, R. editor, Connectedness and binary branching. Foris: Dordrecht.
144. KAYNE, R. (1991). 'Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO'. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647-86.
145. KAYNE , R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
146. KOOPMAN, H. and SPORTICHE, D. (1991). 'The position of subjects . Lingua 85: 211-58.
147. KRäMER, I. (2000). Interpreting Indefinites. An experimental study of children's language comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
148. KRATZER, A. (1989). 'Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates'. In Bach, E., Kratzer, A., and Partee, B. H., editors, Papers on Quantification. University of Massachussets: Amherst. 147-222.
149. KRIFKA, M., PELLETIER, F. J., CARLSON, G. N., TER MEULEN, A., LINK, G., AND CHIER- CHIA, G. (1995). 'Genericity: An introduction'. In Carlson, G. N. and Pelletier, F. J., editors, The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. 1-124.
150. KUNO, S. (1972). 'Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English'. Linguistic Inquiry 3: 269-320.
151. KURODA, S. Y. (1972). 'The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax'. Foundations of Language 9:153-85.
152. LABELLE, M. (1985). 'Caractère post-lexical de la cliticisation française'. Linguisticæ Investigationes 9: 83-96.
153. LABELLE, M. (1990). 'Predication, wh-movement and the development of relative clauses'. Language Acquisition 1: 95-119.
154. LABELLE, M. (1996). 'The acquisition of relative clauses: Movement or no movement?' Language Acquisition 5: 65-82.
155. LABELLE, M. and VALOIS, D. (1996). 'The status of post-verbal subjects in French child language'. Probus 8: 53-80.
156. LAENZLINGER, C. (1998). Comparative Studies in Word Order Variation. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
157. LAHOUSSE, K. (2003). 'NP-subject inversion in French and (preposed) adverbs. In Pérez-Leroux, A. and Roberge, Y., editors, Romance Linguistics: Theory and acquisition. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 181-96.
158. LAMBRECHT, K. (1981). Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French, Pragmatics & Beyond vol. II: 6. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
159. LAMBRECHT, K. (1986). Topic, focus, and the grammar of spoken French. Doctoral dissertation, University of California.
160. LAMBRECHT, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
161. LAMBRECHT, K. (2001). 'Dislocation. In Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W., and Raible, W., editors, Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, vol. 20.2. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin. 1050-78.
162. LAMIROY, B. (1991). 'Coréférence et référence disjointe: les deux pronoms en et y. Travaux de Linguistique 22: 41-67.
163. LARSSON, E. (1979). La dislocation en français: étude de syntaxe générative. Gleerup: Lund.
164. LASNIK, H. and SAITO, M. (1992). Move alpha. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
165. LASNIK, H. and STOWELL, T. (1991). 'Weakest crossover'. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 687-720.
166. LEBEAUX, D. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachussets.
167. LI, C. N. and THOMPSON, S. A. (1976). 'Subject and topic: A new typology of language'. In Li, C., editor, Subject and Topic. Academic Press: New York. 457-89.
168. LOCKE, J. (1983). Phonological Acquisition and Change. Academic Press: New York.
169. LUST, B. (1999). 'Universal Grammar: The strong continuity hypothesis in first lan- gugae acquisition'. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K., editors, Handbook Of Child Language Acquisition. Academic Press: San Diego. 111-55.
170. MCNALLY, L. (1998). 'On the linguistic encoding of information packaging instructions'. In Culicover, P. and McNally, L., editors, The Limits of Syntax. Academic Press: San Diego. 161-83.
171. MACWHINNEY, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ.
172. MARATSOS, M. (1974). 'Preschool children's use of definite and indefinite articles'. Child Development 45: 446-55.
173. MERCHANT, J. (2005). 'Fragments and ellipsis'. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 661-738.
174. MERTENS, P. (1987). L'intonation du français. De la description linguistique à la reconnaissance automatique. Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
175. MERTENS, P. (1993). Intonational grouping, boundaries, and syntactic structures in French. In House, D. and Touati, P., editors, Proc. ESCA Workshop on prosody, Lund Working Papers 41: 156-9.
176. MERTENS, P. (1997). 'De la chaîne linéaire à la séquence de tons'. Traitement Automatique des Langues 38: 27-51.
177. MERTENS, P., GOLDMANN, J.-P., WEHRLI, E., and GAUDINAT, A. (2001). 'La synthèse de l'intonation à partir de structures syntaxiques riches'. Traitement Automatique des Langues 42: 142-95.
178. MILLER, P. and MONACHESI, P. (2003). 'Les pronoms clitiques dans les langues romanes. In Godard, D., editor, Les langues romanes: problèmes de la phrase simple. Editions du CNRS: Paris. 67-123.
179. MILNER, J.-C. (1978). De la syntaxe à l'interprétation: quantités, insultes, exclamations. Seuil: Paris.
180. MILNER, J.-C. (1979). 'Le système de la négation en français et l'opacité du sujet'. Langue Française 4: 80-105.
181. MILSARK, G. (1974). Existential Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
182. MOREAU, M.-L. (1976). C'est. Etude de syntaxe transformationnelle. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Mons.
183. MüLLER, N. (1994). 'Parameters cannot be reset: Evidence from the development of COMP'. In Meisel, J. M., editor, Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 235-69.
184. MüLLER, N., CRYSMANN, B., and KAISER, G. A. (1996). 'Interaction between the acquisition of French object-drop and the development of the C-system. Language Acquisition 5: 35-63.
185. NEWMEYER, F. J. (2003). 'Against the split-CP hypothesis'. In Banski, P. and Przepi- orkowsk, A., editors, Proceedings of GLiP-5. Polish Academy of Sciences: Warsaw. 81-93.
186. NICE, M. (1925). 'The length of sentences as a criterion of child's progress in speech'. Jounal of Educational Psychology 16: 370-79.
187. O'GRADY, W. (1997). Syntactic Development. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
188. PESETSKY, D. (1986). 'Wh-in situ: Movement and unselective binding'. In Reuland, E. and ter Meulen, A., editors, The Representation of (In)definiteness. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. 98-129.
189. PETERS, A. (2001). 'Filler syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar?' Journal of Child Language. 28: 229-42.
190. PIERCE, A. (1992). Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
191. PIERCE, A. (1994). 'On the differing status of subject pronouns in French and English child language'. In Lust, B., Hermon, G., and Kornfilt, J., editors, Syntactic theory and first language acquisition-Crosslinguistic perspectives: Volume 2-Binding, dependencies, and learnability. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ. 319-33.
192. PINKER, S. (1984). Language Learnability and Language Development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
193. PLUNKETT, B. (1999). Periphrastic questions as inversion and their acquisition in European French. Poster presented at the IASCL conference, San Sebastian, Basque Country, Spain.
194. PLUNKETT, B. (2000). 'The emergence of periphrastic questions in child French'. In Perkins, M. and Howards, S., editors, New Directions in Language Development and Language Disorders. Plenum Press: New York. 105-17.
195. PLUNKETT, B. (2001). 'Attract and covert merge: Predicting interrogative variation'.In Alexandrova, G. M. and Arnaudova, O., editors, The Minimalist Parameter. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 159-72.
196. PLUNKETT, B. (2002). 'Null Subjects in Child French Interrogatives: A view from the York Corpus'. In Pusch, C. and Raible, W., editors, Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und gesprochene Sprache. Narr: Tübingen. 441-52.
197. PLUNKETT, B. (2003). 'Null subjects and the setting of subject agreement parameters in child French'. In Pérez-Leroux, A. and Roberge, Y., editors, Romance Linguistics: Theory and acquisition. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 351-66.
198. PLUNKETT, B. and DE CAT, C. (2001). 'Root specifiers and null subjects revisited'. Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Child Language Development. Cascadilla: Somerville, MA. 611-22.
199. PORTNER, P. and YABUSHITA, K. (1998). 'The semantics and pragmatics of topic phrases'. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 117-57.
200. POSTAL, P. (1970). Cross-Over Phenomena. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.
201. POWERS, S. (2001). 'A minimalist account of phrase structure acquisition'. In Alexandrova, G. M. and Arnaudova, O., editors, The Minimalist Parameter. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 33-50.
202. PREVOST, P. (2006). 'The phenomenon of object omission in child L2 French'. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9: 263-80.
203. PRINCE, E. (1999). How not to mark topics: 'Topicalization' in English and Yiddish. Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
204. PRINCE, E. F. (1981). 'Topicalization, focus-movement, and Yiddish-movement: A pragmatic differentiation'. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 249-64.
205. RASETTI, L. (2000). 'Null subjects and Root Infinitives in the child grammar of French'. In Friedemann, M.-A. and Rizzi, L., editors, The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics. Longman: New York. 236-68.
206. REINHART, T. (1981). 'Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics'. Philo- sophica 27: 53-94.
207. REINHART, T. (1996). 'Interface economy: Focus and markedness'. In Wilder, C., Gaertner, H.-M., and Bierwisch, M., editors, The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Akademic Verlag: Berlin. 146-69.
208. RIZZI, L. (1986). 'On the status of subject clitics in Romance'. In Jaeggli, O. and Silva- Corvalan, C., editors, Studies in Romance Linguistics. Foris: Dordrecht. 391-419.
209. RIZZI, L. (1990). Relativized Minimality. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
210. RIZZI, L. (1991). 'Residual verb second and the wh-criterion'. Technical Reports in Formal and Computational Linguistics, 2: 1-28.
211. RIZZI, L. (1994). 'Early null subjects and root null subjects'. In Lust, B., Her- mon, G., and Kornfilt, J., editors, Syntactic theory and first language acquisition- Crosslinguistic perspectives: Volume 2-Binding, dependencies, and learnability. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ. 249-72.
212. RIZZI, L. (1997). 'The fine structure of the left periphery'. In Haegeman, L., editor, Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 281-337.
213. RIZZI, L. (2002). 'Locality and left periphery'. In Belletti, A., editor, Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 223-51.
214. ROBERGE, Y. (1986). 'Subject doubling, free inversion, and null argument languages'. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 31: 55-79.
215. ROBERGE, Y. (1990). The syntactic recoverability of null arguments. McGill-Queen's University Press: Montréal.
216. ROBERTS, C. (1998). Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics. Manuscript, Ohio State University.
217. ROCHEMONT, M. (1986). Focus in generative grammar. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
218. RODMAN, R. (1974). 'On Left-Dislocation'. Papers in Linguistics 7: 437-66.
219. ROEPER, T. (1992). 'From the initial state to V2: Acquisition principles in action'. In Meisel, J., editor, The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 333-70.
220. RONAT, M. (1979). 'Pronoms topiques et pronoms distinctifs'. Langue française 44: 106-28.
221. ROOTH, M. (1992). 'A theory of focus interpretation'. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116.
222. ROSSI, J. R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
223. ROSSI, M. (1971). 'Le seuil des glissando ou seuil de perception des variations tonales pour les sons de la parole'. Phonetica 23: 1-33.
224. ROSSI, M. (1972). 'Le seuil différentiel de la durée'. In Valdman, A., editor, Papers in linguistics and phonetics to the memory of Pierre Delattre. Mouton: The Hague. 435-50.
225. ROSSI, M. (1973). 'L'intonation prédicative dans les phrases transformées par permutation'. Linguistics 103: 64-94.
226. ROSSI, M. (1981). 'Intonation, énonciation, syntaxe'. In Rossi, M., Di Cristo, A., Hirst, D., Martin, P., and Nishinuma, Y., editors, L'intonation: de l'acoustique à la sémantique. Klincksieck: Paris. 184-234.
227. ROSSI, M. (1999). L'intonation. Le système du français: description et modélisation. Ophrys: Paris.
228. ROWLETT, P. (1998). Sentential Negation in French. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
229. ROWLETT, P. (1999). 'French ne in non-verbal contexts'. In D'Hulst, Y., Rooryck, J., and Schroten, J., editors, Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999: Selected papers from Going Romance. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 335-53.
230. RUWET, N. (1990). 'En et y: deux clitiques pronominaux anti-logophoriques'. Langages 97: 51-81.
231. SABEL, J. (2002). 'Intermediate traces, reconstruction and locality effects'. In Alexi- adou, A., editor, Theoretical Approaches to Universals. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 259-313.
232. SAITO, M. and FUKUI, N. (1998). 'Order in phrase structure and movement'. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439-74.
233. SAMEK-LODOVICI, V. (2006). 'When Right-Dislocation meets the Left-periphery'. Lingua 116: 836-73.
234. SCHäCHTER, P. (1973). 'Focus and relativization'. Language 49: 19-46.
235. SCHAEFFER, J., GORDISHEVSKY, G., HADAR, G., and HACOHEN, A. (2002). 'Subjects in English-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment'. In Costa, J. and Freitas, M. J., editors, Proceedings of the GALA 2001 Conference. Associaçao Por- tuguesa de Linguistica, Lisboa. 223-31.
236. SCHAEFFER, J. and MATTHEWSON, L. (2005). 'Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems'. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 53-101.
237. SCHüTZE, C. T. (1997). INFL in Child and Adult Language: Agreement, Case, and Licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
238. SELLS, P. (1984). Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns. GSLA: Amherst.
239. SIMON, A.-C. (2001). 'Le rôle de la prosodie dans le repérage des unités textuelles minimales'. Cahiers de Linguistique française 23: 99-125.
240. SNOW, D. and BALOG, H. (2002). 'Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research'. Lingua 112: 1025-58.
241. SPORTICHE, D. (1988). 'A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure'. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425-49.
242. SPORTICHE, D. (1995). 'Clitic constructions'. In Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L., editors, Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Kluwer: Dordrecht. 213-76.
243. STAINTON, R. (2004). 'In defense of non-sentential assertion'. In Szabo, Z., editor, Semantics vs. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 383-457.
244. STALNAKER, R. (1974). 'Pragmatic presuppositions'. In Munitz, M. and Unger, P., editors, Semantics and Philosophy. New York University Press: New York. 197-213.
245. STRAWSON, P. F. (1964). 'Identifying reference and truth values. Theoria 30: 96-118.
246. SZENDROI, K. (2001). Focus and the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Doctoral dissertation, UCL.
247. SZENDROI, K. (2003). 'A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus'. The Linguistic Review 20: 37-78.
248. TANAKA, H. (2001). 'Right-Dislocation as scrambling'. Journal of Linguistics 37: 551-79.
249. TELLIER, C. (2001). 'On some distinctive properties of parasitic gaps in French'. In Culicover, P. and Postal, P., editors, Parasitic Gaps. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. 341-67.
250. TOMIOKA, S. (2001). 'Information structure and disambiguation in Japanese'. In Megerdoomian, K., and Bar-el, L., editors, Proceeding of WCCFL, 20. Cascadilla Press: Somerville, MA. 552-64.
251. UNSWORTH, S. (2005). Child L2, Adult L2, Child Li: Differences and Similarities. LOT: Utrecht.
252. URIAGEREKA, J. (1995). 'An F position in Western Romance'. In é. Kiss, K., editor, Discourse configurational languages. Oxford University Press: Oxford. 153-75.
253. VALLDUVP E. (1992). The Informational Component. Garland: New York.
254. VAN HAAFTEN, T., SMITS, R., and VAT, J. (1983). 'Left Dislocations, connectedness and reconstruction'. In Ehlich, K. and van Riemsdijk, H., editors, Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text. KUB: Tilburg. 133-54.
255. VAN KAMPEN, J. (2004). 'The learnability of syntactic categories'. In van Kampen, J. and Baauw, S., editors, Proceedings of GALA 2003. 245-56.
256. VAN RIEMSDIJK, H. and ZWARTS, F. (1974). Left Dislocation in Dutch and the Status of Copying Rules. Unpublished manuscript, MIT and University of Amsterdam.
257. VAT, J. (1981). 'Left Dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction'. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 20: 80-103.
258. VECCHIATO, S. (2000). 'The ti/tu interrogative morpheme in Quebec French'. Generative Grammar in Geneva 1: 141-63.
259. VENDRYES, J. (1920). Le langage. Albin Michel: Paris.
260. VILLALBA, X. (1998). 'Right Dislocation is not Right Dislocation'. In Fullana, O. and Roca, F., editors, Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages. Universitat de Girona: Girona. 227-41.
261. VILLALBA, X. (2000). The Syntax of Sentence Periphery. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
262. VION, M. (1992). 'The role of intonation in processing Left and Right Dislocations in French'. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 53: 45-71.
263. VON FINTEL, K. (1994). Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachussets.
264. WARD, G. and PRINCE, E. F. (1991). 'On the topicalization of indefinite NPs'. Journal of Pragmatics 15:167-78.
265. WEXLER, K., SCHüTZE, C. T., and RICE, M. (1998). 'Subject case in children with SLI and unaffected controls: Evidence for the Agr/Tense omission model'. Language Acquisition 7: 317-44.
266. ZRIBI-HERTZ, A. (1984). 'Prépositions orphelines et pronoms nuls'. Recherches Linguistiques 12: 46-91.
267. ZRIBI-HERTZ, A. (1994). 'The syntax of nominative clitics in standard and advanced French'. In Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L., and Zanuttini, R., editors, Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne. Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC. 453-72.
268. ZUBIZARRETA, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
269. ZWICKY, A. and PULLUM, G. (1983). 'Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't'. Language 59: 502-13.