UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR:THE STRONG CONTINUITY HYPOTHESIS IN FIRST LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Handbook of Child Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 111-155

  Lust, Barbara ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85199152764     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789004653023_007     Document Type: Chapter

References (195)

1. Allen, S. (1994). Acquisition of some mechanisms of transitivity alternation in Arctic Quebec lnuktitut. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
2. Allen, S., & Crago, M. (1993). Early acquisition of passive morphology in Inuktitut. Proceedings of 24th Annual Child Language Research Forum. E. Clark (Ed.) (pp. 112-123). Stanford, CA.
3. Andrews, A., III. (1985). Studies in the syntax of relative and comparative clauses. New York: Garland Publishing.
4. Atkinson, M. (1993). Children s syntax. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
5. Austin, J., Blume, M., Parkinson, D., Nunez del Prado, Z., Lust, B. (1997). The Acquisition of Spanish null and overt pronouns: Pragmatic and syntactic factors. In Somashekar, S. et al. (Eds.) CUWPL. 15, 160-177.
6. Barbier, I. (1993a). The structure of IP in German and Dutch: Arguments from first Language acquisition. Proceedings of the 10th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics.
7. Barbier, I. (1993b). Unscrambled objects in the acquisition of Dutch. Paper presented at the Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition. University of Durham, England.
8. Barbier, I. (1995a). Configuration and movement in Germanic: Studies of first Language acquisition of Dutch word-order. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.
9. Barbier, I. (1995b). The acquisition of embedded clauses with finite verbs in non final position in Dutch (pp. 147-158). Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association. Center for Study of Language and Information.
10. Barbier, I. (1996a). An experimental study of scrambling and object shift in the acquisition of Dutch. Proceedings of Berne Workshop on the L2 and L2 Acquisition of Clause-Internal Rules: Scrambling and Cliticization.
11. Barbier, I. (1996b). The head direction of Dutch VPs: Evidence from LI acquisition. In C. Koster and F. Wijnen (Eds.), Proceedings of the GroningenAssembly on Language Acquisition (pp. 97-106). Groningen: Centre for Language and Cognition Groningen.
12. Blank, M., Gessner, M., & Esposito, A. (1979). Language without communication: A case study. Journal of Child Language, 2, 329-352.
13. Bloom, L. (1970). Language development, form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123-172). Dordrecht: Reidel.
15. Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1992). Biunique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 147-189.
16. Boser, K. (1992). Early knowledge of verb position in children s acquisition of German: Anargument for continuity of universal grammar. Unpublished MA thesis, Cornell University.
17. Boser, K. (1997). Verb initial utterances in early child German. In E. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the 27th Stanford Child Language Forum. Stanford University.
18. Boser, K., Santelmann, L., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1995). Grammatical mapping from UG to Language specific grammar: Variation in the acquisition of German, Dutch and Swedish. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), BUCLD Proceedings. Boston: Cascadilla Press.
19. Boser, K., Santelmann, L., Lust, B., & Whitman, J. (1991a). The syntax of CP and V-2 in early German child grammar: The strong continuity hypothesis. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Association, 22, 51-66. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
20. Boser, K., Santelmann, L., Lust, B., & Whitman, J. (1991b). The theoretical significance of auxiliary insertion in early child German. Paper presented at Boston University Child Language Conference, Boston, MA.
21. Boser, K., Santelmann, L., & Lust, B.(in preparation). Obligatory syntax in first Language acquisition: Arguments for the "strong continuity hypothesis" from V-2 in early child German. Unpublished Manuscript, Cornell University.
22. Cairns, H., McDaniel, D., & Hsu, J. R. (1993). A reply to "Children are in control." Cognition, 48(2), 193-194.
23. Caplan, D. (1992). Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Chien, Y.-C., & Lust, B. (1983). Topic-comment structure and grammatical structure in first Language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese: A study of equi-constructions. In Stanford University Paper and Reports on Child Language Development, 22, 74-82.
25. Chien, Y.-C., & Lust, B. (1985). The concepts of topic and subject in first Language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese. Child Development, 56(6), 1359-1375.
26. Chien, Y.C., & Wexler, K. (1990). Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 1(3), 225-295.
27. Chomsky, C. (1969). The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Chomsky, N. (1975a). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
30. Chomsky, N. (1975b/1955-1956). Logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum Press.
31. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
32. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
33. Chomsky, N. (1984). Changing perspectives on knowledge and use of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger Scientific.
35. Chomsky, N. (1987). Language in a psychological setting. Sophia Linguistica. Working Papers in Linguistics, number 22. Tokyo, Japan. (See also chapter 1 in this volume).
36. Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. The Managua lectures. Cam­ bridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In R. Friedin (Ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 417-454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1991). Principles and parameters theory. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Stemefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: deGruyter.
40. Chugani, H., & Phelps, M. (1986). Maturational changes in cerebral function in infants determined by 18/FDG Positron Emission Tomography. Science, 231, 840-843.
41. Cohen Sherman, J. (1983). The acquisition of control in complement sentences: The role of structural and lexical factors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
42. Cohen Sherman, J., & Lust, B. (1993a). Children are in control. Cognition, 46, 1-51.
43. Cohen Sherman, J., & Lust, B. (1993b). A note on continuity of universal grammar: Response to Cairns, McDaniel and Hsu, Cognition, 48(2), 195-197.
44. Crain, S., & McKee, C. (1986). Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, & J. McDonough (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual North Eastern Linguistic Society. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 94-110.
45. Crain, S., & Nakayama, J. J. (1986). Structure dependence in children's Language. Languag 62, 522-543.
46. Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie. New York: Academic Press.
47. Curtiss, S. (1982). Developmental dissociations of Language and cognition. In L. Ohler & L. Menn (Eds.), Exceptional Language and linguistics (pp. 285-312). New York: Academic Press.
48. Demuth, K. (1989). Maturation, continuity, and the acquisition of Sesotho passive. Language, 65, 56-80.
49. Demuth, K. (1992). Accessing functional categories in Sesotho: Interactions at the morpho-syntax interface. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in Language development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
50. Demuth, K. (1994). On the underspecification of functional categories in early grammars. In B. Lust, M. Sufier, & J. Whitman (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 1. Heads, projections and leamability. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
51. Deprez, V., & Pierce, A. (1994). Cross-linguistic evidence for functional projections in early child grammar. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 57-84). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
52. Diamond, A. (1991). Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 67-110). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
53. Egido, C. (I 983). The functional role of the closed class vocabulary in children's Language processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
54. Eisele, J. (1988). Meaning and form in children s judgments about Language. Unpublished MA thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
55. Eisele, J. (1993). The role of negation in determining presuppositions and implications of truth: A study of early hemisphere damage. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
56. Eisele, J., Lust, B., & Aram, D. (1998). Presupposition and Implication of Truth: Linguis tic Deficits following early Brain Lesions. Brain and Language, 61, 376-394.
57. Eisele, J., & Lust, B. (1996). Children's knowledge about pronouns: A developmental study using a "truth value judgement task." Child Development, 67, 3086-3100.
58. Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second Language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 677-758.
59. Feldman, H., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Gleitman, L. (1978). Beyond Herodotus: The creation of Language by linguistically deprived deaf children. In A. Lock (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of Language (pp. 251-414). New York: Academic Press.
60. Flynn, S., & Lust, B. (1980). Acquisition of relative clauses. A preliminary report. In W. Harbert (Ed.), Cornell University Working Papers, 1(1). Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
61. Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Mapping from the initial state to the final state: The separation of universal principles and Language specific principles. In B. Lust, M. Sufier & J. Whitman (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume/. Heads, projections and leamability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Foley, C. (1996). Knowledge of the syntax of operators in the initial state: The acquisition of relative clauses in French and English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
63. Foley, C., Nunez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1992a). LF representation of pronouns in VP ellipsis: An argument for UG in the initial state. Paper presented at BU conference on child Language development. Boston, MA.
64. Foley, C., Nunez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1992b). On the strong continuity hypothesis: A study of pronoun coindexing. Paper presented at LSA, Philadelphia.
65. Foley, C., Nunez del Prado, Z., Barbier, I., & Lust, B. (1992c). Quantifier raising in VP ellipsis. Paper presented at 'wh' workshop, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
66. Foley, C., Nunez de Prado, Z., Barbier, I. & Lust B. (1997). Operator variable binding in the "Initial State": An argument from English VP ellipsis. Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics. 15. Papers on Language acquisition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1-19.
67. Fortescue, M. (1985). Learning to Speak Greenlandic: A Case Study of a two-year-old's morphology in a polysynthetic Language. First Language, 5, 101-114.
68. Gair, J. (1988). Kinds of markedness. In S. Flynn and W. O'Neil (Eds.), Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 225-250), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
69. Gair, J. (1998). Studies in South Asian Linguistics. New York: Oxford.
70. Gair, J., Lust, B., Sumangala, L., & Rodrigo, M. (1989). Acquisition of null subjects and control in some Sinhala adverbial clauses. In Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 28, 97-106. Stanford University.
71. Garrett, M., & Cohen-Sherman, J. (1989). Modular perfonnance systems in normal and aphasic Language. Paper presented at American Association for Advancement of Sci­ence, Symposium on Brain and Language, San Francisco.
72. Gehring, W. J. (1987). Homeo Boxes in the Study of Development. Science, 1245-1252.
73. Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1983). A review of some Piagetian concepts. In P. Mussen, (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., volume 3, pp. 167-230), J. Flavell & E. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
74. Gerken, L. (1994). Sentential processes in early child Language: Evidence from the perception and production offunction morphemes. In H. Nusbaum & J. Goodman (Eds.), The transition from speech sounds to spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Gerken, L. (1996). Phonological and distributional information in syntax acquisition. In K. Demuth & J. Morgan (Eds.), From signal to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
76. Gerken, L., & McIntosh, B. (1993). Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early Language. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 448-457.
77. Gerken, L., Remez, R., & Landau, B. (1990). Function morphemes in young children's speech perception and production. Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 204-216.
78. Gleitman, L. (1981). Maturational determinants of Language growth. Cognition, 10, 103-114.
79. Gleitman, L. (1994). A picture is worth a thousand words, but that's the problem: The role of syntax in vocabulary acquisition. In B. Lust, J. Whitman, & M. Sufier (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross linguistic perspectives. Volume 1: Heads, projections, and leamability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Gleitman, L., Gleitman, H., Landau, R., & Wanner, E. (1988). Where learning begins: Initial representations for Language learning. In F. Newmyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Linguistic Survey. Volume 111. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 150-193). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
81. Goldin-Meadow, S. (1982). The resilience of recursion: A study of a communication sys­ tem developed without a conventional Language model. In L. Gleitman & E. Wanner (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 51-77). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
82. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Feldman, H. (1977). The development of Language-like communication without a Language model. Science, 22, 401-403.
83. Gould, J., & Marler, P. (1987). Leaming by instinct. Scientific American, 256(1), 74-85.
84. Grimshaw, J., & Rosen, S. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: The developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2).
85. Guasti, M. T. (1993). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and nonfinite verbs. Language Acquisition, 3(1), 1-40.
86. Guasti, M. T., & Shlonsky, U. (1992). The acquisition of French relative clauses reconsidered. Paper presented at Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, Massachusetts.
87. Hamburger, H. (1980). A deletion ahead of its time. Cognition, 8, 389-416.
88. Hamburger, H., & Crain, S. (1982). Relative acquisition. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language Development (Volume 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler-Nelson, D., Jusczyk, P., Wright Cassidy, K. L., Druss, B., & Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants. Cognition, 26, 269-286.
90. Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (1997). The origins of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Brad­ ford Books.
91. Huttenlocher, P. R. (1974). Synapse elimination and plasticity in developing human cerebral cortex. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 488-496.
92. Huttenlocher, P. (1990). Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development. Neuropsychologia, 28, 517-527.
93. Huttenlocher, P.R. (1974). Dendritic development in neocortex of children with mental defect and infantile spasms. Neurology, 24, 203-210.
94. Hyams, N. (1984). Semantically-based child grammars: Some empirical inadequacies. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 23, 58-65.
95. Hyams, N. (1986). Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
96. Hyams, N. (1994). VP, null arguments and COMP projections. In J. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
97. Jakobson, R. (1972). Child Language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton. [Original work published 1941.].
98. Jakubowicz, C. (1989). Maturation or invariance of universal grammar principles in Language acquisition. Probus, 1.3, 283-340.
99. Jakubowicz, C. (1994). Reflexives in French and Danish: Morphology, syntax, and acquisition. In B. Lust, G. Hermon, & J. Komfilt (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 2. Binding, dependencies and learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
100. Jusczyk, P. (1997). The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
101. Jusczyk, P., Kemler Nelson, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kennedy, L., Woodward, A., & Piwoz, J. (1992). Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 252-293.
102. Jusczyk, P., & Mazuka, R. (1993). Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development.
103. Kapur, S., Lust, B., Harbert, W., & Martohardjono, G. (1993). Universal grammar and learn­ ability theory: The case of binding domains and the subset principle. In E. Reuland & W. Abraham (Eds.), Knowledge and Language, Volume 3, Issues in Representation and Acquisition (pp. 185-216). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
104. Kapur, S., Lust, B., Harbert, W., & Martohardjono, G. (in preparation). On the Language faculty and leamability theory. Intensional and extensional principles in the representation and acquisition of binding domains.
105. Kaufman, D. (1988). Grammatical and cognitive interactions in the study of children's knowledge of binding theory and reference relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia.
106. Kaufman, D. (1994). Grammatical or pragmatic: Will the real Principle B please stand? In B. Lust, G. Hermon, & J. Komfilt (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 2. Binding, dependencies and learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Komfilt, J. (1994). Some remarks on the interaction of case and word order in Turkish: Implications for acquisition. In B. Lust, M. Sufier, & J. Whitman (Eds.), pp. 159-170.
108. Koster, C. (1994). Problems with pronoun acquisition. In B. Lust, G. Hermon, & J. Kornflit (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 2. Binding, dependencies and learnability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
109. Koster, J. (1978). Locality principles in syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
110. Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. (1985). Language and experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
111. Lasnik, H., & Crain, S. (1985). On the acquisition of pronominal reference. Lingua, 65, 135-154.
112. Lebeaux, D. (1990). The grammatical nature of the acquisition sequence: Adjoin-A and the formation of relative clauses. In L. Frazier & J. deVilliers (Eds.), Language processing and Language acquisition (pp. 13-82). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
113. Lee, K-O. (1991). On the first Language acquisition of relative clauses in Korean: The universal structure of COMP. Korea: Hanshin Publishing.
114. Lee, K-O., Lust, B., & Whitman, J. (1990). On functional categories in Korean: A study of the first Language acquisition of Korean relative clauses. In E-J. Baek (Ed.), Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics (pp. 312-333). University of Toronto Press.
115. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of Language development. New York: Wiley.
116. Levy, Y. (1983). It's frogs all the way down. Cognition, 15, 75-93.
117. Lust, B. (1977). Conjunction reduction in child Language. Journal of Child Language, 4(2), 257-297.
118. Lust, B. (1981). Constraint on anaphora in early child Language: A prediction for a universal. In S. Tavakolian (Ed.), Linguistic theory and first Language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
119. Lust, B. (1983). On the notion "Principal Branching Direction": A parameter of universal grammar. In Y. Otsu, H. VanRiemsdijk, K. Inoue, A. Kamio & N. Kawasaki (Eds.), Studies in Generative Grammar and Language Acquisition, Tokyo Gakugei University, Japan.
120. Lust, B. (Ed.). (1986). Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora. Volume I. Defining the Constraints. Dordrecht: Reidel Press.
121. Lust, B. (Ed.). (1987). Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora. Volume 2. Applying the Constraints. Dordrecht: Reidel Press.
122. Lust, B. (1994). Functional projection of CP and phrase structure parameterization: An argument for the strong continuity hypothesis. In B. Lust, J. Whitman, & M. Sufier (Eds.), Cross linguistic perspectives. Volume I: Heads, projections, and leamability (pp. 85-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
123. Lust, B. (in preparation). Universal grammar and the initial state: Cross-linguistic studies of directionality. Bradford Books/MIT Press.
124. Lust, B., Barbier, I., Boser, K., Foley, C., Kapur, S., Nufiez del Prado, Z., Sufier, M., & Whitman, J. (1994). General introduction: Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. In B. Lust, M. Sufier, and J. Whitman (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Lust, B., & Chien, Y-C. (1984). The structure of coordination in first Language acquisition of Chinese. Cognition, 17, 49-83.
126. Lust, B., Chien, Y-C., Chiang, C-P., & Eisele, J. (1996). Chinese pronominals in universal grammar: A study of linear precedence and command in Chinese and English children's first Language acquisition. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 5, 1-47.
127. Lust, B., Chien, Y-C., & Flynn, S. (1987). What children know: Comparison of experimental methods for the study of first Language acquisition. In B. Lust (Ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora: Volume 2. Applying the constraints (pp. 271-356). Dordrecht: Reidel Press.
128. Lust, B., & Clifford, T. (1986). The 3-D study: Effects of depths, distance, and directionality on children's acquisition of anaphora. In B. Lust (Ed.), pp. 203-244.
129. Lust, B., & Eisele, J. (1991). On the acquisition of syntax in Tamil: A comment on Garman (1974). Journal of Child Language, 18, 215-226.
130. Lust, B., Aynn, S., Chien, Y-C., & Clifford, T. (1980). Coordination: The role of syntactic, pragmatic and processing factors in first Language acquisition. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 19, 79-87.
131. Lust, B., Aynn, S., Foley, C., & Chien, Y-C.(1999). How do we know what children know? Problems and advances in establishing scientific methods for the study of Language acquisition and linguistic theory. M. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child Language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
132. Lust, B., Hermon, G., & Kornfilt, J. (Eds.) (1994). Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 2. Binding, Dependencies and Learn­ ability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
133. Lust, B., Komfilt, J., Hermon, G., Foley, C., Nunez del Prado, Z., & Kapur, S. (1994). Introduction: Constraining binding, dependencies and learnability: Principles or parameters. In B. Lust, G. Hermon & J. Kornfilt (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 2. Binding, dependencies and learnability (pp. 1-37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
134. Lust, B., Loveland, K., & Kornet, R. (1980). The development of anaphora in first Language: Syntactic and pragmatic constraints. Linguistic Analysis, 6(2), 217-249.
135. Lust, B., Mangione, L., Chien, Y-C.(1984). The determination of empty categories in first Language acquisition of Chinese. In W. Harbert (Ed.), Cornell University Working Papers in linguistics, 6, Ithaca, NY, pp. 151-165.
136. Lust, B., & Martohardjono, G. (1987). On the contribution of the binding theory module to a theory of the acquisition of anaphora. Paper presented at BU conference. Boston, MA.
137. Lust, B., & Mazuka, R. (1989). Cross-linguistic studies of directionality in first Language acquisition: The Japanese data (response to O'Grady, Suzuki-Wei and Cho 1986). Journal of Child Language, 16, 665-684.
138. Lust, B., Eisele, J., & Mazuka, R. (1992, June). The binding theory module: Evidence from first Language acquisition for Principle C. Language, 68(2), 333-358.
139. Lust, B., Mazuka, R., Martohardjono, G., & Yoon, J.-M. (1989). On parameter setting in first Language acquisition: The case of the binding theory. Paper presented at GLOW, Utrecht.
140. Lust, B., & Mervis, C. A. (1980). Coordination in the natural speech of young children. Journal of Child Language, 7(2), 279-304.
141. Lust, B., Solan, L., Aynn, S., Cross, C., & Schuetz, E. (1981). A comparison of null and pronominal anaphora in first Language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Linguistic Society, 175-186. [See also B. Lust (Ed.), 1986.].
142. Lust, B., Sufier, M., & Whitman, J. (Eds.), (1994). Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 1. Heads, Projections and Leamability. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
143. Lust, B., Wakayama, T., Mazuka, R., Otani, K., & Snyder, W. (1985). Confinnationalfactors in Japanese anaphora: Evidence from acquisition. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America, Seattle., WA.
144. McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Cairns, H. (Eds.). (1996). Methods for assessing children's syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
145. McKee, C., & Emiliani, M. (1992). II clitico: C'e ma non si vede. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10, 415-437.
146. Marx, J. L. (1981). Genes that control development. Science, 213, 1485-1488.
147. Marx, J. L. (1987). Developmental control gene sequenced. Science, 236, 26-27.
148. Marx, J. L. (1988). Symposium focuses on genes in development. Science, 239, 1493-1494.
149. Maxfield, T., & Plunkett, B. (Eds.). (1991). Papers in the Acquisition of WH. UMOP Special Edition, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
150. Mazuka, R. (1998). The Development of Language Processing Strategies. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
151. Mazuka, R. (1996). Can a grammatical parameter be set before the first word?: Prosodic contributions to early setting of a grammatical parameter. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax. NJ: LEA. 313-330.
152. Mazuka, R., & Lust, B. (1994). When is an anaphor not an anaphor. A study of Japanese "zibun." In B. Lust, J. Kornfilt, & G. Hermon (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross linguistic perspectives. Volume II: Binding, dependencies, and learnability (pp. 145-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
153. Mazuka, R., Lust, B., Snyder, W., & Wakayama, T. (1995). Null subject grammar and phrase structures in early syntax acquisition: A cross-linguistic study of Japanese and English. In C. Jakubowicz (Ed.), Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes. France, Vincennes, 24, 55-81.
154. Mazuka, R., Lust, B., Wakayama, T., & Snyder, W. (1986). Distinguishing effects of parameters in early syntax acquisition: A cross-linguistic study of Japanese and English. In Stanford University Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 73-82.
155. Mehler, J., and Christophe, A. (1995). Maturation and learning of Language in the first year of life. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.) The Cognitive Neurosciences, (pp. 943-954). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
156. Mills, D., Coffey-Corine, S., & Neville, H. (1993). Language acquisition and cerebral specialization in 20-mo-old infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5(3).
157. Morgan, J., & Demuth, K. (1996). Signal to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
158. Neville, H., Mills, D., & Lawson, D. (1992). Fractionating Language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 224-258.
159. Newport, E., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (1978). Mother, I'd rather do it myself: Some effects and noneffects of maternal speech style. In C. Snow & D. Ferguson (Eds.), Talk­ ing to children. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press (pp. 109-150).
160. Nieddu, P. (1997). The Object Agreement rule in Passato Prossimo of Young Italian Children. In CUWPL 15, papers on Language Acquisition (pp. 141-159). S. Somashekar et al. (Eds.).
161. Nunez de Prado, Z., Foley, C., & Lust, B. (1993). The significance of CP to the pro-drop parameter: An experimental study of Spanish-English comparison. In E. Clark (Ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Child Language Research Forum, 25, 146-157. Stanford University, CSLI.
162. Nunez de Prado, Z., Foley, C., Proman, R., & Lust, B. (1994). Subordinate CP and prodrop: Evidence for Degree-n learnability from an experimental study of Spanish and English acquisition. In M. Gonzalez (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS, 24, 443-460.
163. Nunez de Prado, Z., Foley, C., Proman, R., & Lust, B. (1997). Subordinate CP and prodrop: Evidence for degree-n learnability. In S. Somashekar et al. (Eds.), Cornell working papers in linguistics, 15, 141-159.
164. Oshima, S., & Lust, B. (1997). Remarks on Anaphora in Japanese Adverbial clauses. In S. Somashekar et al. (Eds.). CUWPL. 15, 88-100.
165. Packard, J. (1982). The acquisition of modified nominals in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished master's thesis, Cornell University.
166. Packard, J. (1987). The first Language acquisition of prenominal modification with "de" in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 31-53.
167. Padilla Rivera, J. (1990). On the Definition of Binding Domains. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Parkinson, D. (In preparation). The acquisition of morphology in lnuktitut: Theoretical issues and empirical evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
168. Penner, Z. (1994). Asking questions without CPs? In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 177-212). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing.
169. Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (Ed.). (1980). The Chomsky-Piaget Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
170. Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D., & Frost, L. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26, 195-267.
171. Pizzuto, E., & Casselli, M. C. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology: Implication for models of Language development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 491-557.
172. Pye, C. (1983). Mayan telegraphese. Language, 59(3), 583-604.
173. Pye, C., & Quixtan Poz, P. (1988). Precocious passives (and antipassives) in Quiche Mayan PRCLD. Stanford University, pp. 71-80.
174. Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
175. Radford, A. (1994a). The nature of children's initial clauses. Unpublished manuscript, Essex University, GB.
176. Radford, A. (1994b). Tense and agreement variability in child grammars of English. In B. Lust, M. Sufier, & J. Whitman (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition. Volume I. Heads, projections and leamability. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
177. Raghavendra, P., & Leonard, L.B. (1989). The acquisition of agglutinating Languages: Converging evidence from Tamil. Journal of Child Language, 6, 313-322.
178. Roeper, T., & Weissenborn, J. (1990). How to make parameters work. In L. Frazier & J. deVilliers (Eds.), Language processing and Language acquisition (pp. 147-162). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
179. Santelmann, L. (1993). Wh-questionformation in early Swedish: An argument for CP and operator knowledge. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University. Paper presented at BU child Language conference, Boston.
180. Santelmann, L. (1995). The acquisition of verb second grammar in Swedish: WH-questions, topics and verb-raising. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
181. Schmeck, H. M., Jr. (1988). Scientists decipher code that governs life and death of cells. New York Times, April 5.
182. Shipley, E., Smith, C., & Gleitman, L. (1969). A study in the acquisition ofLanguage: Free responses to commands. Language, 45(2), pp. 347-370.
183. Smith, N., & Tsimpli, J.-A. (1995). The Mind of a Savant. Cambridge: Blackwell.
184. Somashekar, S. (1995). Indian children's acquisition of pronominals in Hindi 'jab' clauses: Experimental study of comprehension. Unpublished master's thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
185. Somashekar, S. (1998).
186. Somashekar, S., Yamakoshi, K., Blume, M., & Foley, C. (Eds.). (1997). Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 15. Papers on Language Acquisition, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
187. Stromswald, K. (1990). Leamability and the acquisition of auxiliaries. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
188. Tsimpli, I-M. (1991). Functional categories and maturation: The prefunctional stage of Language acquisition. Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 123-148. London: University College.
189. Valian, V. (1992). Categories offirst syntax. be, be-ing, and nothingness. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in Language acquisition. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
190. Varma, T. L. (1979). Stage one speech of a Hindi-speaking child. Journal of Child Language, 6(1), 167-174.
191. Volterra, V. (1976). A few remarks on the use of the past participle in child Language. Italian Linguistics, 2, 149-157.
192. Wexler, K. (1992). Some issues in the growth of control. In R. Larson, S. Iatridou, U. Lahiri, & J. Higginbothan (Eds.), Control and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
193. Whitman, J., Barbier, I., Boser, K., Kapur, S., Komfilt, J., & Lust, B. (1994). Introduction: Constraining structural variation and the acquisition problem. In B. Lust, M. Sufier, & J. Whitman (Eds.), Syntactic theory and first Language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume/. Heads, projections and learnability (pp. 1-12). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
194. Whitman, J., Lee, K-O., & Lust, B. (1991). Continuity of the principles of Universal Gram­ mar in first Language acquisition: The issue of functional categories. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting, 21 (pp. 383-397). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.
195. Yamada, J. (1990). Laura. A case for the modularity of Language. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.