Looking at space to study mental spaces

Human Cognitive Processing

Volumn 18, Issue , 2007, Pages 201-224

  Sweetser, Eve ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190134653     PISSN: 13876724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/hcp.18.15swe     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Alibali, M. W. (1994). Processes of cognitive change revealed in gesture and speech. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
2. Alibali, M. W. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993a). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child's state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 468-523.
3. Alibali, M. W. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993b). Modeling learning using evidence from speech and gesture. Proceedings of the 15th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 203-208.
4. Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bavelas, J., Chovil, N., Lowrie D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469-489.
6. Butterworth, B. & Beattie, G. (1978). Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. In R. N. Campbell & P. T. Smith (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language: Formal and experimental approaches (pp. 347-360). New York: Plenum.
7. Butterworth, B. & Hadar, U. (1989). Gesture, speech and computational stages: A reply to McNeill. Psychological Review, 96, 168-174.
8. Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9. Cienki, A. (1998a). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition (pp. 189-204). Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.
10. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, Time, Semantics and the Child. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (pp. 27-63). New York: Academic Press.
12. Dancygier, B. (1998). Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2005). Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Duncan, S. (2001). Perspectives on the co-expressivity of speech and co-speech gestures in three languages. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley CA: The Berkeley Linguistics Society.
15. Dudis, P. G. (2004a). Depiction of Events in ASL: Conceptual Integration of Temporal Components. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
16. Dudis, P. G. (2004b). Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 223-238.
17. Engle, R. A. (2000). Towards a theory of multimodal communication: Combining speech, gestures, diagrams and demonstrations in instructional explanations. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Education, Stanford University.
18. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 113-130). Stanford: CSLI.
19. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think. Basic Books.
20. Fillmore, C. J. (1997 [1971]). Lectures on Deixis. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications. (originally published by Indiana University Linguistics Club).
21. Furuyama, N. (2000). Gestural interaction between the instructor and the learner in origami instruction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 99-117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455-479.
23. Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). When does gesture become language? A study of gesture used as a primary communication system by deaf children of hearing parents. In K. R. Gibson & T. Ingold (Eds.), Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution (pp. 63-85). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 419-429.
25. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Goodwin, C. (2000). Gesture, aphasia and interaction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 84-98).
27. Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
28. Grady, J. (1998). The “Conduit Metaphor” revisited: a reassessment of metaphors for communication. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the Gap (pp. 205-217). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
29. Haviland, J. B. (1993). Anchoring, iconicity and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3, 3-45.
30. Haviland, J. B. (2000). Pointing, gesture spaces and mental maps. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 13-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Hill, C. (1982). Up/down, front/back, left/right: A contrastive study of Hausa and English. In J. Weissenborn & W. Klein (Eds.), Here and there: Crosslinguistic studies on deixis and demonstration (pp. 11-42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. Closs (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Horn, L. (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61, 121-174.
34. Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
36. Johnson, C. (1996). Learnability in the acquisition of multiple senses: SOURCE reconsidered. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 469-480.
37. Johnson, Ch. (1999). Constructional grounding: The role of interpretational overlap in lexical and constructional acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
38. Kegl, J. & Iwata, G. (1989). Lenguaje de Signos Nicaragüense: A pidgin sheds light on the 'creole' ASL. In R. Carlson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference (pp. 266-294). Eugene OR: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Oregon.
39. Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (1999). Creation through contact: Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In M. De Graff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 179-237). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kendon, A. (1990). Gesticulation, quotable gestures and signs. In M. Moerman & M. Nomura (Eds.), Culture embodied (pp. 53-77). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
41. Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247-279.
42. Kendon, A. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality? In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 47-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Kita, S. (Ed.). (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162-185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261-283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
49. Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
50. LeBaron, C. & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Levinson, S. C. (1997). Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial description in Guugu Yimithirr. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7(1), 98-131.
52. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Liddell, S. (1990). Four functions of a locus: Reexamining the structure of space in ASL. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues (pp. 176-198). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
54. Liddell, S. (1995). Real, surrogate and token space: grammatical consequences in ASL. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Language, Gesture and Space (pp. 19-41). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Liddell, S. (1998). Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(3), 283-314.
56. Liddell, S. (2000). Blended spaces and deixis in sign language discourse. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 331-357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Liddell, S. (2003). Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Mandel, M. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In L. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand (pp. 55-107). London: Academic Press.
59. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. McNeill, D. (Ed.). (2000). Language and Gesture. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62. McNeill, D. & Duncan, S. (2000). Growth points in thinking for speaking. In McNeill (Ed.), Language and Gesture (pp. 141-161). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
63. Mayberry, R. I., Jaques, J., & DeDe, G. (1998). What stuttering reveals about the development of the gesture-speech relationship. In J. Iverson & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Nature and Function of Gesture in Children's Communication (pp. 89-100). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64. Moore, K. E. (2000). Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.
65. Nobe, S. (2000). Where do most spontaneous representational gestures actually occur with respect to speech? In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 186-198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Núñez, R. & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 1-49.
67. Ohala, J. J., Hinton, L., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1994). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Özyurek, A. (2000). The influence of addressee location on spatial language and representational gestures of direction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 64-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Parrill, F. & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4(2), 197-219.
70. de Ruiter, J. P. (1995). Why do people gesture at the telephone? In M. Bieman & M. Woutersen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Center for Language Studies Opening Academic Year 1995-96 (pp. 49-56). Nijmegen: Center for Language Studies.
71. Sapir, E. (1929). A study in experimental symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 225-239.
72. Sizemore, M. & Sweetser E. (in press). Personal and interpersonal gesture speces: Functional contrasts in language. In A. Tyler, Y. Kim, & M. Takada (Eds.), Language in the Context of Use: Cognitive and Discourse Approaches to Language and Language Learning. Berlin.
73. Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for Linguistic Relativity (pp. 107-138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
74. Slobin, D. I. (1996). From 'thought and language' to 'thinking for speaking.' In J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
75. Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 435-445). Berkeley, CA: The Berkeley Linguistics Society.
76. Smith, N. J. (2003). Gesture and beyond. Honors thesis, Program in Cognitive Science, UC-Berkeley.
77. Sweetser, E. (1987). Metaphorical Models of Thought and Speech: a comparison of historical directions and metaphorical mappings in the two domains. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 446-459). Berkeley, CA: The Berkeley Linguistics Society.
78. Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Sweetser, E. (1992). English Metaphors for Language: Motivations, conventions, and creativity. Poetics Today, 13(4), 705-724.
80. e Congrès International des Linguistes (CD ROM). Oxford: Elsevier
81. Sweetser, E. (1998). Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. In CD-ROM Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, held in Paris in July 1997.
82. Sweetser, E. (2001). Deixis, viewpoint and modality. Plenary talk at the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, July 16-20, 2001 at the University of California at Santa Barbara.
83. Sweetser, E. (2002). Conceptual blending and viewpoint. Plenary talk at the international workshop “The Way We Think, ” at Odense University, Demark, August 19-23, 2002.
84. Sweetser, E. (2003). Literal and metaphorical viewpoint in gesture. Paper presented at the 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, at the University of La Rioja, Spain, July 2003.
85. Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the Body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
86. Traugott, E. Closs (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (pp. 245-71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
87. Traugott, E. Closs (1989). On the rise of espistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31-55.
88. Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Journal of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183-204.
89. Ultan, R. (1978). Size-sound symbolism. In J. H. Greenberg, C. R. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 2. (pp. 527-568). Stanford: Stanford University Press.