What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription

Gesture

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 197-219

  Parrill, Fey ^a   Sweetser, Eve ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Blending; Conceptual integration; Gesture; Meaning

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745897201     PISSN: 15681475     EISSN: 15699773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/gest.4.2.05par     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cienki, Alan (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In Jean-Pierre Koening (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189-204). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
2. Fauconnier, Gilles (1994 [1985]). Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3. Fauconnier, Gilles (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4. Fauconnier, Gilles & Eve E. Sweetser (Eds.) (1996). Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
6. Kendon, Adam (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 247-279.
7. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
9. Liddell, Scott K. (1998). Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 283-314.
10. Liddell, Scott K. (2000). Blended spaces and deixis in sign language discourse. In David McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 331-357). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
11. Liddell, Scott K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12. Mandel, Mark (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Lynn A. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives in American Sign Language (pp. 57-107). London: Academic Press.
13. McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. McNeill, David (2000). Catchments and contexts: Non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. In David McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 321-328). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15. McNeill, David & Susan D. Duncan (2000). Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In David McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 141-161). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Müller, Cornelia (2004). Metaphors. Dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A cognitive approach to metaphors in language use. Habilitationsschrift, Free University Berlin.
17. Sweetser, Eve E. (1992). English metaphors for language: Motivations, conventions, and creativity. Poetics Today, 13(4), 705-724.
18. Taub, Sarah F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press