Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface

Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 1-246

  Erteschik Shir, Nomi ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85189382391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199262588.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (333)

1. Aboh, E. O. (2004). "Left or Right? A View from the Kwa Periphery.” In D. Adger, C. De Cat, and G. Tsoulas (eds.) Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 165-90.
2. Ahrenberg, L. (1989). "A Formal Field Grammar.” NLPLAB Research Report LiTh-IDA-R-89-4, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping.
3. Aissen, J. (1992). "Topic and Focus in Mayan.” Language 68(1): 43-80.
4. Andersen, T. (1991). "Subject and Topic in Dinka.” Studies in Linguistics 15(2):265-94.
5. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Croom Helm.
6. Arnon, I. et al. (2005). "Rethinking Superiority Effects: A Processing Model.” Paper presented at the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, University of Arizona,.
7. Bailyn, J. F. (2002a). "Scrambling to Reduce Scrambling-Part 1.” Glot International 6(4): 83-90.
8. Bailyn, J. F. (2002b). "Scrambling to Reduce Scrambling-Part 2.” Glot International 6(5): 109-24.
9. Bailyn, J. F. (2003). "Does Russian Scrambling Exist?" In S. Karimi (ed.) Word Order and Scrambling. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 156-76.
10. Baker, N. and P. Greenfield (1988). "The Development of New and Old Information in Young Children’s Early Language.” Language Sciences 10(1):3-34.
11. Basilico, D. (1998). "Object Position and Predication Forms.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16(3): 541-95.
12. Basilico, D. (2003). "The Topic of Small Clauses.” Linguistic Inquiry 34(1): 1-35.
13. Bayer, J. (2005). "That-Trace without Reference to the Subject.” 20th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop, Tilburg: invited lecture.
14. Beaver, D. (2002). "Accommodating Topics.” In H. Kamp and B. H. Partee (eds.) Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 73-86.
15. Benincà, P. and C. Poletto (2004). "Topic, Focus, and V2: Defining the CP Sublayers.” In L. Rizzi (ed.) The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. ii. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52-75.
16. Bever, T. G. (1970). "The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures.” In J. R. Hayes (ed.) Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: Wiley, 279-362.
17. Bever, T. G. (2003). "Deconstructing Functionalist Explanations of Linguistic Universals.” In A. Carnie, H. Harley, and M. Willie (eds.) Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 333-52.
18. Birner, B. J. and G. Ward (1998). Information Structure and Noncanonical Word Order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and Form. London: Longman.
20. Bolinger, D. (1978). "Asking More Than One Thing at a Time.” In H. Hiz (ed.) Questions. Dordrecht: Reidel, 87-105.
21. Bresnan, J. and J. Kanerva (1989). "Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1-50.
22. Bresnan, J. W. (2001). Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Breul, C. (2004). Focus Structure in Generative Grammar: An Integrated Syntactic, Semantic and Intonational Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. Broadwell, G. A. (1999). "The Interaction of Focus and Constituent Order in San Dionicio Zapotec.” In M. Butt and T. H. King (eds.) Proceedings of the Lfg99 Conference, the University of Manchester. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
25. Bródy, M. (1990). "Some Remarks on the Focus Field in Hungarian.” UCL Working Papers 2: 202-25.
26. Büring, D. (1999). "Topic.” In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.) Focus:Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 142-65.
27. Büring, D. (2000). "Let’s Phrase It! Focus, Word Order, and Prosodic Phrasing in German Double Object Constructions.” In G. Müller and W. Sternefeld (eds.) Competition in Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 101-37.
28. Büring, D. (2006). "Focus Projection and Default Prominence.” In V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Cann, R., T. Kaplan, and R. Kempson (2005). "Data at the Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: The Case of Resumptive Pronouns in English.” Lingua 115(11):1551-77.
30. Carnie, A. and H. Harley (2003). "Introduction: Formalizing Functionalism.” In A. Carnie, H. Harley, and M. Willie (eds.) Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1-8.
31. Casielles-Suárez, E. (2004). The Syntax-Information Structure Interface:Evidence from Spanish and English. London: Routledge.
32. Chafe, W. (1976). "Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Topics and Point of View.” In C. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 25-55.
33. Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Choi, H.-W. (1999). Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.
35. Chomsky, N. (1971). "Deep Structure, Surface Structure and Semantic Interpretation.” In D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.) Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 183-216.
36. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
37. Chomsky, N. (1976). "Conditions on Rules of Grammar.” Linguistic Analysis 2:303-51.
38. Chomsky, N. (1977). "On Wh-Movement.” In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.) Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 71-132.
39. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht:Foris.
40. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
41. Chomsky, N. (2000). "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 89-155.
42. Chomsky, N. (2001). "Derivation by Phase.” In M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1-52.
43. Chomsky, N. (2004). "Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. iii. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104-31.
44. Cinque, G. (1990). Types of a’-Dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
45. Cinque, G. (1993). "A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress.” Linguistic Inquiry 24(2): 239-97.
46. Clark, H. H. and T. Wasow (1998). "Repeating Words in Spontaneous Speech.” Cognitive Psychology 37: 201-42.
47. Clifton, C., Jr. and L. Frazier (2004). "Should Given Information Come before New? Yes and No.” Memory & Cognition 32(6): 886.
48. Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Culicover, P. W. and M. Rochemont (1983). "Stress and Focus in English.” Language 22(59): 123-65.
50. Daneš, F. (1974). "Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text.” In F. Daneš (ed.) Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague:Academia, 106-28.
51. Darnell, M., et al. eds. (1999). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, General Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. De Cat, C. (2002). French Dislocation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.
53. De Cat, C. (2004). "Early 'Pragmatic’ Competence and the Null Subject Phenomenon.” In B. H. R. Bok-Bennema, B. Kampers-Manhe, and P. Sleeman (eds.) Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002: Selected Papers from Going Romance 2002. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 17-32.
54. de Hoop, H. (1992). Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.
55. De Cat, C. (1997). "Scrambled Definites.” In P. Dekker, J. van der Does, and H. de Hoop (eds.) De Dag: Proceedings of the Workshop on Definites. Utrecht:Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, 37-59.
56. De Cat, C. (2000). "Optional Scrambling and Interpretation.” In H. Bennis and M. Everaert (eds.) Interface Strategies. Amsterdam: Holland Academic Graphics, 153-68.
57. de Hoop, H. (2003). "Scrambling in Dutch: Optionality and Optimality.” In S. Karimi (ed.) Word Order and Scrambling. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 201-16.
58. DeLancey, S. (2001). "Lectures on Functional Syntax”. University of Oregon. www. uoregon.edu/~delancey/sb/LECT1-9.DOC.
59. Diderichsen, P. (1966). Helhed og Struktur. Copenhagen: C. E. C. Grads Forlag.
60. Diderichsen, P. (1968). Elementær Dansk Grammatik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
61. Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
62. Dik, S. C. (1997). The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
63. Dryer, M. S. (1996). "Focus, Pragmatic Presupposition, and Activated Propositions.” Journal of Pragmatics 26(4): 475-523.
64. Dyakonova, M. (2004). "Information Structure Development: Evidence from the Acquisition of Word Order in Russian and English.” In K. Bentzen (ed.) Nordlyd 32.1: Tromsø Working Papers in Language Acquisition, 88-109.
65. Eckardt, R. (2003). "Manner Adverbs and Information Structure: Evidence from the Adverbial Modification of Verbs of Creation.” In E. Lang, C. Maienborn, and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds.) Modifying Adjuncts. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 261-306.
66. É. Kiss, K. (1987). Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.
67. É. Kiss, K. (1995). "Discourse Configurational Languages: Introduction.” In K. E. Kiss (ed.) Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3-27.
68. É. Kiss, K. (1996). "The Focus Operator and Information Focus.” Working Papers in the Theory of Grammar 3.
69. É. Kiss, K. (1998). "Discourse-Configurationality in the Languages of Europe.” In A. Siewierska (ed.) Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter, 681-728.
70. É. Kiss, K. (2003). "Division of Labor in the Derivation and Interpretation of Focus Constructions.” GLOW, Lund.
71. É. Kiss, K. (2004). "The EPP in a Topic-Prominent Language.” In P. Svenonius (ed.) Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107-24.
72. É. Kiss, K. (2006). "Focussing as Predication.” In V. Molnar and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
73. Emonds, J. (1976). A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York:Academic Press.
74. Emonds, J. (2004). "Unspecified Categories as the Key to Root Constructions.” In D. Adger, C. De Cat, and G. Tsoulas (eds.) Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 75-120.
75. Engdahl, E. (2001). "The Role of Syntactic Features in the Analysis of Dialogue.” In C. Rohrer, A. Roßdeutscher, and H. Kamp (eds.) Linguistic Form and its Computation. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications, 111-42.
76. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1973). On the Nature of Island Constraints. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
77. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1979). "Discourse Constraints on Dative Movement.” In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 441-68.
78. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1981). "On Extraction from Noun Phrases (Picture Noun Phrases).” In A. Belletti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.) Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 Glow Conference. Pisa:Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, 147-69.
79. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1982). "Extractability in Danish and Pragmatic Principle of Dominance.” In E. Engdahl and E. Ejerhed (eds.) Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Sweden: Umeå, 175-92.
80. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1986). "Wh-Questions and Focus.” Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 117-49.
81. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1988). "Topic-Chaining and Dominance-Chaining.” In Y. Tobin (ed.) The Prague School and its Legacy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 145-53.
82. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1992). "Resumptive Pronouns in Islands.” In H. Goodluck and M. Rochemont (eds.) Island Constraints, Theory, Acquisition and Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 89-108.
83. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997). The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Erteschik-Shir, N. (1999). "Focus Structure Theory and Intonation.” Language and Speech 42(2-3): 209-27.
85. Erteschik-Shir, N. (2005a). "The Sound Patterns of Syntax: The Case of Object Shift.” Theoretical Linguistics 31(1/2): 47-94.
86. Erteschik-Shir, N. (2005b). "What Is Syntax?" Theoretical Linguistics 31(1/2): 263-74.
87. Erteschik-Shir, N. (2006a). "On the Architecture of Topic and Focus.” In V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 33-57.
88. Erteschik-Shir, N. (2006b). "What’s What?" In C. F. Gisbert Fanselow, Matthias Schlesewsky, and Ralf Vogel (eds.) Gradience in Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89. Erteschik-Shir, N. and S. Lappin (1979). "Dominance and the Functional Explanation of Island Phenomena.” Theoretical Linguistics 6: 41-85.
90. Erteschik-Shir, N. and S. Lappin (1983a). "Dominance and Extraction: A Reply to A. Grosu.” Theoretical Linguistics 10: 81-96.
91. Erteschik-Shir, N. and S. Lappin (1983b). "Under Stress: A Functional Explanation of Sentence Stress.” Journal of Linguistics 19: 419-53.
92. Erteschik-Shir, N. and S. Lappin (1987). "Dominance and Modularity.” Linguistics 25: 671-85.
93. Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport. (1997). "A Theory of Verbal Projection.” In G. Matos and M. Miguel (eds.) Interfaces in Linguistic Theory. Lisbon: APL/Ediçõnes Colibri, 129-48.
94. Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport. (2000). "Aspectual Focus”. GLOW, Bilbao.
95. Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport. (2004). "Bare Aspect: A Theory of Syntactic Projection.” In J. Guéron and J. Lecarme (eds.) The Syntax of Tense. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 217-34.
96. Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport. (2005a). "Path Predicates.” In N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds.) The Syntax of Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport. eds. (2005b). The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98. Erteschik-Shir, N. and T. Rapoport. (in preparation). The Atoms of Meaning: Interpreting Verb Projections. Ben Gurion University.
99. Erteschik-Shir, N. and N. Strahov (2000). "Focus Structure Architecture and P-Syntax.” UCL, London.
100. Erteschik-Shir, N. and N. Strahov (2004). "Focus Structure Architecture and P-Syntax.” Lingua 114(3):301-23.
101. Fanselow, G. (2004). "The Mlc and Derivational Economy.” In A. Stepanov, G. Fanselow, and R. Vogel (eds.) Minimality Effects in Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 73-124.
102. Featherston, S. (2002). "Bridge Verbs and V2 Verbs: The Same Thing in Spades?" Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen.
103. Featherston, S. (2005a). "Magnitude Estimation and What It Can Do for your Syntax:Some Wh-Constraints in German.” Lingua 115(11): 1525-50.
104. Featherston, S. (2005b). "Universals and Grammaticality: Wh-Constraints in German and English.” Linguistics 43(4): 667-712.
105. Finkel, K. von (1989). "Theticity in Generative Grammar.” Papers on Quantification.
106. Firbas, J. (1962). "Notes on the Function of the Sentence in the Act of Communication.” Journal of Studies of the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Brno Series A, 10: 133-48.
107. Firbas, J. (1964). "On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Perspective.” Travaux linguistiques de Prague 1: 267-80.
108. Frey, W. (to appear). "The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface and the German Prefield.” In V. Molnar and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
109. Fukui, N. (1993). "Parameters and Optionality.” Linguistic Inquiry 24: 399-420.
110. Gelderen, V. van (2003). Scrambling Unscrambled. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leiden.
111. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
112. Gernsbacher, M. A. and D. Hargreaves (1988). "Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention.” Journal of Memory and Language 27: 699-717.
113. Gill, K.-H. and G. Tsoulas (2004). "Peripheral Effects without Peripheral Syntax:The Left Periphery in Korean.” In D. Adger, C. De Cat, and G. Tsoulas (eds.) Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 121-42.
114. Givón, T. (1976). "Topic, Pronoun and Grammatical Agreement.” In C. N. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 149-211.
115. Givón, T. (1977). "From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy”. Department of Linguistics. Los Angeles: UCLA.
116. Givón, T. (1979). On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
117. Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
118. Givón, T. (1986). The Pragmatics of Word Order: Predictability, Importance, and Attention. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
119. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
120. Goldberg, A. E. (2001). "Patient Arguments of Causative Verbs Can Be Omitted: The Role of Information Structure in Argument Distribution.” Language Sciences 23(4-5): 503-24.
121. Goldberg, A. E. (2005). "Constructions, Lexical Semantics and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for Generalizations and Subregularities in the Realization of Arguments.” In N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds.) The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
122. Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
123. Goldberg, A. E. and F. Ackerman (2001). "The Pragmatics of Obligatory Adjuncts.” Language 77(4): 798-814.
124. Goodall, G. (2004). "On the Syntax and Processing of Wh-Questions in Spanish.” In B. Schmeiser, V. Chand, A. Kelleher, and A. Rodriguez (eds.) WCCFL 23 Proceedings. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press, 101-14.
125. Gordishevsky, G. and J. Schaeffer (2002). "On Null Subjects in Child Russian.” In Y. Otsu (ed.) The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo, 115-37.
126. Green, G. (1989). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
127. Gregory, M. L. and L. A. Michaelis (2001). "Topicalization and Left-Dislocation:A Functional Opposition Revisited.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1665-706.
128. Grice, P. H. (1975). "Logic and Conversation.” In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58.
129. Grimshaw, J. and S. Vikner (1993). "Obligatory Adjuncts and the Structure of Events.” In E. Reuland and W. Abraham (eds.) Knowledge and Language:Concepts in Linguistic Structure and Beyond. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 143-55.
130. Grosu, A. (1982). "Extragrammatical Motivation for Certain Island Phenomena.” Theoretical Linguistics 9: 17-67.
131. Gruber, J. S. (1967). "Look and See.” Language 43(4): 937-47.
132. Guéron, J. (1980). "On the Syntax and Semantics of PP Extraposition.” Linguistic Inquiry 11(4): 637-78.
133. Gundel, J. K. (1974). The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
134. Gundel, J. K. (1975). "Left Dislocation and the Role of Topic-Comment Structures in Linguistic Theory.” OSU WPL 18: 72-131.
135. Gundel, J. K. (1988). "Universals of Topic-Comment Structure.” In M. Hammond, E. A. Moravcsik, and J. R. Wirth (eds.) Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 209-39.
136. Gundel, J. K. (1998). "Centering Theory and the Givenness Hierarchy: Towards a Synthesis.” In M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi, and E. F. Prince (eds.) Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 183-98.
137. Gundel, J. K. (2003). "Information Structure and Referential Givenness/Newness: How Much Belongs in the Grammar?" In S. Müller (ed.) Proceedings of the Hpsg03 Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications, 122-42.
138. Gundel, J. K. (2006). "Information Structure and Distinctions between Grammar and Use: Some Evidence from Clefts in English and Norwegian.” In V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
139. Gussenhoven, C. (1984). On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Foris.
140. Haider, H. (2004). "The Superiority Conspiracy: Four Constraints and a Processing Effect.” In A. Stepanov, G. Fanselow, and R. Vogel (eds.) The Minimal Link Condition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 147-76.
141. Haider, H. and I. Rosengren (1998). "Scrambling.” Sprache und Pragmatik, 49. Lund.
142. Haider, H. and I. Rosengren (2003). "Scrambling: Nontriggered Chain Formation in OV Languages.” Journal of German Linguistics 15(3): 203-67.
143. Hale, K. (1982). "Preliminary Remarks on Configurationality.” Proceedings of NELS: 86-96.
144. Hale, K. and J. Keyser (1993). "On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations.” In K. Hale and J. Keyser (eds.) The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press, 53-109.
145. Hale, K. and J. Keyser (2005). "Aspect and the Syntax of Argument Structure.” In N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds.) The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
146. Hale, K. L. (1992). "Basic Word Order in Two 'Free Word Order’ Languages.” In D. Payne (ed.) Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 63-82.
147. Hale, K. L. and E. Selkirk (1987). "Government and Tonal Phrasing in Papago.” Phonology Yearbook 4: 151-83.
148. Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). "Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2.” Journal of Linguistics 3: 199-244.
149. Hannay, M. (1985). English Existentials in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
150. Heim, I. (1982a). "File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness.” Stanford University.
151. Heim, I. (1982b). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
152. Hirschberg, J. (1991). A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland.
153. Hockey, B. A. (1998). The Interpretation and Realization of Focus: An Experimental Investigation of Focus in English and Hungarian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
154. Hoek, K. van (1995). "Conceptual Reference Points: A Cognitive Grammar Account of Pronominal Anaphora Constraints.” Language 71(2): 310-40.
155. Hoji, H. (1985). Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
156. Holmberg, A. (1999). "Remarks on Holmberg’s Generalization.” Studia Linguistica 53(1): 1-39.
157. Holmberg, A. (2000). "Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting: How Any Category Can Become an Expletive.” Linguistic Inquiry 31(3): 445-83.
158. Horvath, J. (1981). Aspects of Hungarian Syntax and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles.
159. Horvath, J. (1986). Focus in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.
160. Horvath, J. (2000). "Interfaces vs. the Computational System in the Syntax of Focus.” In H. Bennis, M. Everaert, and E. Reuland (eds.) Interface Strategies. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 183-207.
161. Horvath, J. (2005). "Movement, Economy and the PF-Interface: The Case of So-Called 'Focus-Movements’.” Ben Gurion University 10.5.
162. Hsiao, F. and E. Gibson (2003). "Processing Relative Clauses in Chinese.” Cognition 90(1): 3-27.
163. Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). "On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns.” Linguistic Inquiry 15(4): 531-74.
164. Hyams, N. and K. Wexler (1993). "On the Grammatical Basis of Null Subjects in Child Language.” Linguistic Inquiry 24(3): 421-59.
165. Ishii, Y. (2001). "Presuppositional Effects of Scrambling Reconsidered.” COE International Symposium, Kanda University of International Studies.
166. Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
167. Jackendoff, R. (1977). X’-Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
168. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
169. Jacobs, J. (2001). "The Dimensions of Topic-Comment.” Linguistics 39(4):641-82.
170. Jäger, G. (1995). Topics in Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Munich, CIS-Bericht-96-92.
171. Jelinek, E. and A. Carnie (2003). "Argument Hierarchies and the Mapping Principle.” In A. Carnie, H. Harley, and M. Willie (eds.) Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 265-98.
172. Jensen, A. (2000). "Sentence Intertwining in Danish: A Challenge to the RRG Account?" University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
173. Junghanns, U. and G. Zybatow (1997). "Syntax and Information Structure of Russian Clauses.” In E.W.B. et al. (eds.) Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting. Ann Arbor Michigan Slavic Publications, 289-319.
174. Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. Oxford: Blackwells.
175. Kaiser, E. (2002). "The Syntax-Pragmatics Interface and Finnish Ditransitive Verbs.” In M. van Koppen, E. Thrift, E. J. van der Torre, and M. Zimmermann (eds.) Proceedings of Console IX, 2000. www.sole.leidenuniv.nl/content_docs/Console2000pdfs/kaiser.pdf
176. Kamp, H. (1981). "A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation.” In J. J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.) Truth, Interpretation and Information. Dordrecht: Foris, 1-41.
177. Karimi, S. (2003). "On Object Positions, Specificity, and Scrambling in Persian.” In S. Karimi (ed.) Word Order and Scrambling. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 91-124.
178. Kathol, A. (2000). Linear Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
179. Kayne, R. S. (1984). Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
180. Keenan-Ochs, E. and B. Schieffelin (1976). "Foregrounding Referents: A Reconsideration of Left-Dislocation in Discourse.” BLS 2: 240-57.
181. Kempson, R., R. Cann, and J. Kiaer (2006). "Topic, Focus and the Structural Dynamics of Language.” In V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
182. Kempson, R., W. Meyer-Viol, and D. Gabbay (2001). Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
183. Kenesei, I. (2006). "Focus as Identification.” In V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) The Architecture of Focus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
184. Kidwai, A. (1999). "Word Order and Focus Positions in Universal Grammar.” In G. Rebuschi and L. Tuller (eds.) The Grammar of Focus. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 213-44.
185. Kidwai, A. (2004). "The Topic Interpretation in Universal Grammar.” In V. Dayal and A. Mahajan (eds.) Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 253-89.
186. Kim, A. H. O. (1988). "Preverbal Focusing and Type XXIII Languages.” In M. Hammond, E. Moravcsik, and J. Wirth (eds.) Studies in Syntactic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 147-72.
187. Kim, S.-I., J.-H. Lee, and M. A. Gernsbacher (2004). "The Advantage of First Mention in Korean: The Temporal Contributions of Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Factors.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33(6): 475-91.
188. King, T. H. (1995). Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian. Stanford, Calif.:CSLI.
189. King, T. H. (1997). "Focus Domains and Information Structure.” Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
190. Kluender, R. (1992). "Deriving Island Constraints from Principles of Predication.” In H. Goodluck and M. Rochemont (eds.) Island Constraints:Theory, Acquisition and Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 223-58.
191. Kluender, R. (1998). "On the Distinction between Strong and Weak Islands: A Processing Perspective.” In P. W. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.) Syntax and Semantics: The Limits of Syntax. San Diego: Academic Press, 241-79.
192. Kluender, R. (2004). "Are Subject Islands Subject to a Processing Account?" In B. Schmeiser, V. Chand, A. Kelleher, and A. Rodriguez (eds.) WCCFL 23 Proceedings. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press, 101-25.
193. Kratzer, A. (1989). "Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates.” Papers on Quantification. Amherst: Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts.
194. Krifka, M. (1992). "A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Construction.” In J. Jacobs (ed.) Informationsstruktur und Grammatik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 17-53.
195. Kuno, S. (1971). "The Position of Locatives in Existential Sentences.” Linguistic Inquiry: 333-78.
196. Kuno, S. (1976). "Subject, Theme, and the Speaker’s Empathy: A Reexamination of Relativization Phenomena.” In C. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic. New York:Academic Press, 417-44.
197. Kuno, S. (1982). "The Focus of the Question and the Focus of the Answer.” Papers from the Parasession on Nondeclarative Sentences from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: 276-337.
198. Kuno, S. (1987). Functional Syntax, Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
199. Kuno, S. (1991). "Remarks on Quantifier Scope.” In H. Nakajima (ed.) Current English Linguistics in Japan. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 261-87.
200. Kuno, S. and K.-I. Takami (1993). Grammar and Discourse Principles: Functional Syntax and Gb Theory. Left Periphery Deletion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
201. Kuroda, S.-Y. (1972). "The Categorical and the Thetic Judgment (Evidence from Japanese).” Foundations of Language 9: 153-85.
202. Ladd, D. R. (1980). The Structure of Intonational Meaning. Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
203. Ladusaw, W. (1994). "Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong”. Proceedings from SALT IV, Cornell University.
204. Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
205. Lambrecht, K. (2000). "When Subjects Behave Like Objects: An Analysis of the Merging of S and O in Sentence-Focus Constructions across Languages.” Studies in Language 24(3): 611-82.
206. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. i. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
207. Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. ii. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
208. Langacker, R. W. (2001). "Discourse in Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Linguistics 12(2):143-88.
209. Larson, R. J. (1988). "On the Double Object Construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 335-91.
210. Lasnik, H. and T. Stowell (1991). "Weakest Crossover.” Linguistic Inquiry 22(4):687-720.
211. Lebeaux, D. (1988). Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
212. Li, C. and S. Thompson (1976). "Subject and Topic: A New Typology.” In C. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 457-90.
213. Liberman, M. (1975). The Intonation System of English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
214. López, L. (2003). "Steps for a Well-Adjusted Dislocation.” Studia Linguistica 57(3): 193-231.
215. MacDonald, M. C. and M. Christiansen (2002). "Reassessing Working Memory:Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1999).” Psychological Review 109: 35-54.
216. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York:McGraw-Hill.
217. MacWhinney, R. (1977). "Starting Points.” Language 53: 152-68.
218. Massam, D. (2002). "Questions in Niuean.” Paper presented at AFLA IX, Cornell University.
219. Maynell, L. A. (2003). "Discourse Constraints on Extraposition from Definite NP Subjects in English.” Ohio State University, Columbus. www.ling. ohio-state.edu/~maynell/papers/RelClause.Ex.pdf.
220. Meinunger, A. (2000). Syntactic Aspects of Topic and Comment. Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
221. Miller, P. H. (2001). "Discourse Constraints on (Non)Extraposition from Subject in English.” Linguistics 39(4): 683-701.
222. Mittwoch, A. (1971). "Idioms and Unspecified NP Deletion.” Linguistic Inquiry 2(2):255-9.
223. Mittwoch, A. (1982). "On the Difference between Eating and Eating Something: Activities Versus Accomplishments.” Linguistic Inquiry 13(1): 113-22.
224. Mittwoch, A. (2005). "Unspecified Arguments in Episodic and Habitual Sen tences.” In N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport (eds.) The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
225. Miyagawa, S. (1997). "Against Optional Scrambling.” Linguistic Inquiry 28(1): 1-25.
226. Miyagawa, S. (2003). "A-Movement Scrambling and Options without Optionality.” In S. Karimi (ed.) Word Order and Scrambling. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 177-200.
227. Molnár, V. (1998). "Topic in Focus: On the Syntax, Semantics, Phonology and Pragmatics of the So-Called 'Contrastive Topic’ in Hungarian and German.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45(1-2): 89-166.
228. Morgan, J. L. (1975). "Some Interactions of Syntax and Pragmatics.” In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, vol. iii. New York: Academic Press, 289-303.
229. Neeleman, A. and T. Reinhart (1998). "Scrambling and the PF Interface.” In M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds.) The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications, 309-53.
230. Newmeyer, F. (1982). "On Discourse-Based Syntax: A Critical Examination of on Understanding Grammar by Tamly Givón.” Journal of Linguistic Research 2(1): 1-12.
231. Newmeyer, F. (1999). "Some Remarks on the Functionalist-Formalist Controversy in Linguistics.” In M. Darnell, E. Moravcsik, F. Newmeyer, M. Noonan, and K. Wheatley (eds.) Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, i: General Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 469-86.
232. Newmeyer, F. (2001). "The Prague School and North American Functionalist Approaches to Syntax.” Journal of Linguistics 37: 101-26.
233. Nikolaeva, I. (2001). "Secondary Topics as a Relation in Information Structure.” Linguistics 39(1): 1-49.
234. Partee, B. H. (1991). "Topic, Focus and Quantification.” SALT 1: 257-80.
235. Paul, I. (2002). "The Syntactic Encoding of Topic and Focus.” Georgetown Working Papers in Formal Linguistics 2: 247-61.
236. Paul, I. (2005). "Multiple Topics: Evidence from Malagasy.” Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association IX, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics.
237. Payne, D. (1999). "What Counts as an Explanation?" Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, i: General Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137-65.
238. Pesetsky, D. (1987). "Wh-in Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding.” In E. Reuland and A. T. Meulen (eds.) The Representation of (in)Definiteness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
239. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
240. Pierrehumbert, J. and J. Hirschberg (1990). "The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse.” In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack (eds.) Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press, 271-311.
241. Polinsky, M. (2001). "Information Structure and Syntax: Topic, Discourse-Linking, and Agreement.” Third Workshop on Spoken and Written Texts. Austin: Texas Linguistic Forum.
242. Pollard, C. and I. A. Sag (1987). Information-Based Syntax and Semantics, i: Fundamentals. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.
243. Poulsen, M. (2005). Sentence Processing and Grammaticality in Functional Linguistics: Extraction in Danish as an Example. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Copenhagen.
244. Prince, E. (1981a). "Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information.” In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223-56.
245. Prince, E. (1981b). "Topicalization, Focus-Movement, and Yiddish-Movement: A Pragmatic Differentiation.” BLS 7: 249-64.
246. Prince, E. (1986). "On the Syntactic Marking of Presupposed Open Propositions.” In A. Farley, P. Farley, and K.-E. McCullough (eds.) Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 22nd Regional Meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society: 208-22.
247. Prince, E. (1988). "Discourse Analysis: A Part of the Study of Linguistic Competence.” In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, ii: Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164-82.
248. Prince, E. (1997). "On the Functions of Left-Dislocation in English Discourse.” In A. Kamio (ed.) Directions in Functional Linguistics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 117-44.
249. Prince, E. (1998). "On the Limits of Syntax, with Reference to Left-Dislocation and Topicalization.” In P. W. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.) Syntax and Semantics: The Limits of Syntax. San Diego: Academic Press, 281-302.
250. Rahkonen, M. (2006). "Some Aspects of Topicalization in Active Swedish Declaratives: A Quantitative Corpus Study.” Linguistics 44(1): 23(33).
251. Raviv, A. S. (2005). Identifying and Processing Topicalization in Danish. MA thesis, Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva.
252. Reinhart, T. (1981). "Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics.” Philosophica 27: 53-94.
253. Reinhart, T. (1995). "Interface Strategies.” Ots Working Papers. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
254. Reinhart, T. (1996). "Interface Economy: Focus and Markedness.” In C. Wilder, H. M. Gaertner, and M. Bierwisch (eds.) The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory. Berlin: Academic Verlag, 146-69.
255. Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface Strategies: Reference-Set Computation. Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
256. Reis, M. (1995). "Extractions from Verb-Second Clauses in German?" In U. Lutz and J. Pafel (eds.) On Extraction and Extraposition in German. Amsterdam:Benjamins, 45-88.
257. Rice, S. (1988). "Unlikely Lexical Entries.” In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, and H. Singmaster (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th Annual Berkeley Linguistics Society 202-12.
258. Ritter, E. and S. T. Rosen (2004). "Topicalization, Focalization and the Syntax of Not-Topics.” University of Calgary and University of Kansas, manuscript.
259. Rizzi, L. (1997). "The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281-337.
260. Rizzi, L. (2004a). "Locality and the Left Periphery.” In A. Belletti (ed.) Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. iii. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 223-51.
261. Rizzi, L. ed. (2004b). The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. ii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
262. Roberts, C. (1998). "Focus, the Flow of Information and Universal Grammar.” In P. W. Culicover and L. McNally (eds.) The Limits of Syntax, Syntax and Semantics 29. San Diego: Academic Press, 109-60.
263. Roberts, C. (2003). "Uniqueness in Definite Noun Phrases.” Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 287-350.
264. Roberts, J. R. (2005). "Scrambling in Persian: An RRG Approach.” SIL International. http://linguistics.buffalo.edu/research/rrg.html.
265. Rochemont, M. S. (1986). Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
266. Rodionova, E. V. (2001). Word Order and Information Structure in Russian Syntax. MA thesis, University of North Dakota.
267. Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
268. Rooth, M. (1992). "A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75-116.
269. Rosengren, I. (1997). "The Thetic/Categorical Distinction Revisited Once More.” Linguistics 35(3): 439-79.
270. Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
271. Rudin, C. (1985). Aspects of Bulgarian Syntax: Complementizers and Wh-Constructions. Columbus, Oh.: Slavica.
272. Sadeh-Leicht, O. (2005). "Parsing Self-Embedding as Islands: A Phrasal Approach.” Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS. www.let.uu.nl/~Oren.SadehLeicht/personal/Parsing%20Self%20Embeddings%20LI%20for%20Submission.pdf.
273. Sadeh-Leicht, O. and J. Ginzburg (2000). Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
274. Sadeh-Leicht, O. and C. Pollard (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: University of Chicago Press and CSLI Publications.
275. Sadeh-Leicht, O. and C. Pollard, et al. (2005). "Processing Accounts for Superiority Effects.” Stanford University.
276. Samek-Lodovici, V. (2005). "When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-Periphery:A Unified Analysis of Italian Non-Final Focus.” Lingua. In press.
277. Sasse, H. (1987). "The Thetic/Categorical Distinction Revisited.” Linguistics 25:511-80.
278. Schaeffer, J. (1997). Direct Object Scrambling in Dutch and Italian Child Language. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles.
279. Schaeffer, J. (2000). The Acquisition of Direct Object Scrambling and Clitic Placement:Syntax and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
280. Schaeffer, J. (to appear). Specific Language Impairment as Evidence for the Division of Labor between Pragmatics and Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
281. Schmerling, S. F. (1973). Aspects of English Sentence Stress. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.
282. Schulz, B. (2005). "Tune in-Drop Out: Harmonic Alignment as a Prerequisite for German Topic Drop.” http://72.14.221.104/search?q=cache:J××5_c4JuSsJ:ww2. hawaii.edu/~bschulz/academics/ToDo_WOTSPaper.pdf+%22tune+in-drop +out%22+harmonic+alignment&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1.
283. Schwarzschild, R. (1999). "Givenness, Avoid F and Other Constraints on the Placement of Focus.” Natural Language Semantics 7(2): 141-77.
284. Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
285. Selkirk, E. (1995). "Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress, and Phrasing.” In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory. London: Basil Blackwell, 550-69.
286. Sgall, P., E. Hajičová, and J. Panevova (1986). The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
287. Shimojo, M. (1995). Focus Structure and Morphosyntax in Japanese: Wa and Ga and Word Order Flexibility. Ph.D. dissertation, SUNY, Buffalo, NY.
288. Smith, C. S. (1991/7). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
289. Steedman, M. (1991). "Structure and Intonation.” Language 67(2): 260-96.
290. Steedman, M. (1996). Surface Structure and Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
291. Steedman, M. (2000a). "Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface.” Linguistic Inquiry 31(4): 649-89.
292. Steedman, M. (2000b). The Syntactic Process. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
293. Stemmer, B. (1999). "An On-Line Interview with Noam Chomsky: On the Nature of Pragmatics and Related Issues.” Brain and Language 68(3): 393-401.
294. Strahov, N. (2001). "A Scrambling Analysis of Wh-Questions in Russian.” In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Bloomington Meeting, 2000. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Productions, 293-311.
295. Strawson, P. F. (1964). "Identifying Reference and Truth-Values.” Theoria 30: 86-99.
296. Surànyi, B. (2004). "The Left Periphery and Cyclic Spellout: The Case of Hungarian.” In D. Adger, C. De Cat, and G. Tsoulas (eds.) Peripheries:Syntactic Edges and their Effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 49-74.
297. Svenonius, P. (2001). "On Object Shift, Scrambling and the Pic.” In E. Guerzoni and O. Matushansky (eds.) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 267-89.
298. Svenonius, P. (2004). "Subject Positions and the Placement of Adverbials.” In P. Svenonius (ed.) Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201-42.
299. Szabolcsi, A. (1997). "Strategies for Scope Taking.” In A. Szabolcsi (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 109-55.
300. Szendröi, K. (2001). Focus and the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.
301. Szendröi, K. (2003). "A Stress Based Approach to the Syntax of Hungarian Focus.” Linguistic Review 20: 37-78.
302. Szendröi, K. (2004). "Focus and the Interaction between Syntax and Pragmatics.” Lingua 114(3): 229-54.
303. Szendröi, K. and J. Costa (2003). "Focus and the Syntax-Phonology Interface.” GLOT 7(9/10): 261-8.
304. Takano, Y. (1998). "Object Shift and Scrambling.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 817-89.
305. Taverniers, M. (2005). "Subjecthood and the Notion of Instantiation.” Language Sciences 27(6): 651-78.
306. Vallduví, E. (1990). The Informational Component. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
307. Vallduví, E. (1992). "The Dynamics of Information Packaging.” Manuscript: University of Edinburgh Published (1994) in E. Engdahl (ed.) Integrating Information Structure into Constraint-based and Categorial Approaches. ESPRIT Basic Research Project 6852, Dynamic Interpretation of Natural Language. DYANA-2 Deliverable R 1.3.B. ILLC. University of Amsterdam, 1-27.
308. Vallduví, E. and E. Engdahl (1995). "Information Packaging and Grammar Architecture.” In J. N. Beckman (ed.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25, University of Pennsylvania. Amherst: GLSA, 519-33.
309. Van Valin, R. D. ed. (1993a). Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. 82. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
310. Van Valin, R. D. ed. (1993b). "A Synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar.” In R. D. Van Valin (ed.) Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-164.
311. Van Valin, R. D. ed. (1999a). "A Brief Overview of Role and Reference Grammar.” http://wings. buffalo.edu/soc-sci/linguistics/research/rrg/RRGpaper.pdf.
312. Van Valin, R. D. ed. (1999b). "Generalized Semantic Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface.” In F. Corblin, C. Dobrovie-Sorin, and J.-M. Marandin (eds.) Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 2. The Hague: Thesus, 373-89.
313. Van Valin, R. D. ed. (1999c). "A Typology of the Interaction of Focus Structure and Syntax.” In E. Raxilina and J. Testelec (eds.) Typology and the Theory of Language: From Description to Explanation. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture, 511-24.
314. Van Valin, R. D. ed. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
315. Van Valin, R. D. and R. J. LaPolla (1997). Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
316. Villalba, X. (1998). "Right Dislocation Is Not Right Dislocation.” In D. O. Fullana and F. Roca (eds.) Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages: Proceedings of the III Symposium on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages. Girona: Universitat de Girona, 227-41.
317. Volpe, M. (2004). "Affected Object Unergatives.” Snippets 8.
318. von Heusinger, K. (1999). Intonation and Information Structure. Habilitationsschrift, University of Konstanz.
319. Vries, L. de (1985). "Topic and Focus in Wambon Discourse.” In A. M. Bolkestein, C. De Groot, and J. L. Mackenzie (eds.) Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris, 155-80.
320. Wagner, M. (2003). "Holmberg’s Generalization in an OV Language.” Manuscript, MIT.
321. Walker, M. A., A. K. Joshi, and E. F. Prince. eds. (1997). Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
322. Ward, G. (1988). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Preposing. New York:Garland.
323. Ward, G. and J. Hirschberg (1985). "Implicating Uncertainty: The Pragmatics of Fall-Rise Intonation.” Language 61(4): 747-76.
324. Ward, G. and E. F. Prince (1991). "On the Topicalization of Indefinite NPs.” Journal of Pragmatics 15(8): 167-78.
325. Watters, J. R. (1979). "Focus in Aghem: A Study of Its Formal Correlates and Typology.” In L. M. Hyman (ed.) Aghem Grammatical Structure. Los Angeles:University of Southern California, 137-97.
326. Wedgewood, D. J. (2003). Predication and Information Structure: A Dynamic Account of Hungarian Pre-Verbal Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
327. Weskott, T. (2002). "Topicalization in Context: Processing the Left Periphery of German V2-Sentences.” Conference on Information Structure in Context, Stuttgart University.
328. Wexler, K. (1998). "Very Early Parameter Setting and the Unique Checking Constraint:A New Explanation of the Optional Infinitive Stage.” Lingua 106: 23-79.
329. Williams, E. (2003). Representation Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
330. Wiltschko, M. (1998). "Superiority in German.” In E. Curtis, J. Lyle, and G. Webster (eds.) WCCFL 16: The Proceedings of the Sixteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI, 431-45.
331. Winkler, S. and E. Göbbel (2002). "Review Article: Zubizaretta, M.L. (1998) Prosody, Focus, and Word Order, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 33. Massachusetts: MIT Press.” Linguistics 40(6): 1185-243.
332. Ziv, Y. and P. Cole. (1974). "Relative Extraposition and the Scope of Definite Descriptions in Hebrew and English.” In M. W. LaGaly, R. Fox, and A. Bruck (eds.) Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago, 772-86.
333. Zubizaretta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.