The advantage of first mention in korean the temporal contributions of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 475-491

  Kim, Sung Il ^a   Lee, Jae Ho ^b   Gernsbacher, Morton Ann ^c  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

^b Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

first mention; Korean; pragmatics; semantics; sentence representation; structure building framework; syntax; time course

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; TIME PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 8644268145     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-004-2667-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aaronson, D., & Ferres, S. (1983). Lexical categories and reading tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 675-699.
2. Birch, S. L., & Garnsey, S. M. (1995). The effect of focus on memory for words in sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 232-267.
3. Carreiras, M., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first-mention in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 124-129.
4. Chang, F. R. (1980). Active memory process in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference. Memory & Cognition, 8, 58-64.
5. Cirilo, R. K., & Foss, D. J. (1980). Text structure and the reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96-109.
6. Clark, H. H. (1965). Some structural properties of simple active and passive clauses. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 365-370.
7. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language Comprehension as Structure Building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304.
9. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699-717.
10. Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D., & Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 735-755.
11. Givón, T. (1986). The Pragmatics of Word Order: Predictability. Importance, and Attention. Amsterdam: Benjam's.
12. Green, G. H. (1989). Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Haberlandt, K., & Graesser, A. C. (1985). Integration and buffering of new information. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 25 (pp. 71-87). New York: Academic Press.
14. Johnson, M. G. (1967). Syntactic position and rated meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 240-246.
15. Kim, S. & Lee, J. (1995). The effect of syntactic and pragmatic constraints on sentential representation and memory accessibility. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 6, 97-116.
16. Mckoon, G., Ratcliff, R., Ward, G., & Sproat, R. (1993). Syntactic prominence on discourse processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 593-607.
17. MacWhinney, R. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53, 152-168.
18. Osgood, C. E. (1971). Where do sentences come from? In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An Inter-disciplinary Reader (pp. 497-529). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Zubin, D. A. (1979). Discourse function of morphology: The focus system in German. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax. (pp. 469-504). New York: Academic Press.