Object position and predication forms

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 541-595

  Basilico, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041888606     PISSN: 0167806X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006042111781     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Allerton, D. J.: 1978, 'Generating Indirect Objects in English', Journal of Linguistics 14, 1-20.
2. Allerton, D. J. and A. Cruttenden: 1979, 'Three Reasons for Accenting a Definite Subject', Journal of Linguistics 15, 49-53.
3. Anderson, Stephen R.: 1971, 'On the Role of Deep Structure in Semantic Interpretation', Foundations of Language 7, 387-396.
4. Anderson, Stephen R.: 1977, 'Comments on the Paper by Wasow', in Peter Culicover et al. (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 361-377.
5. Aoun, Joseph and Yen-Hui Audrey Li: 1989, 'Constituency and Scope', Linguistic Inquiry 20, 141-172.
6. Aoun, Joseph and Yen-Hui Audrey Li: 1993, The Syntax of Scope, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7. Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
8. Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson and Ian Roberts: 1989, 'Passive Arguments Raised', Linguistic Inquiry 20, 219-252.
9. Belletti, Adriana: 1988, 'The Case of Unaccusatives', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1-34.
10. Birner, Betty: 1994, '"Information Status and Word Order": An Analysis of English Inversion', Language 70, 233-59.
11. Birner, Betty: 1995, 'Pragmatic Constraints on the Verb', Lingua 97, 233-256.
12. Borer, Hagit: 1993, 'The Projection of Arguments', University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, 19-47.
13. Borer, Hagit: 1996, 'Passive without Theta Grids', in Steven Lapointe (ed.), Morphological Interfaces, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
14. Bowers, John: 1993, 'The Syntax of Predication', Linguistic Inquiry 2-4, 591-656.
15. Bresnan, Joan: 1994, 'Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar', Language 70(1), 72-131.
16. Bresnan, Joan and Jonni Kanerva: 1989, 'Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar', Lingustic Inquiry 20, 1-50.
17. Carlson, Gregory: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusett, Amherst.
18. Chomsky, Noam: 1986, Knowledge of Language, Praeger, New York.
19. Chomsky, Noam: 1991, 'Some Notes on the Economy of Derivation and Representation', in Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 417-454.
20. Chomsky, Noam: 1993, 'A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory', in Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1-52.
21. Chomsky, Noam: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
22. Collins, Chris and Höskuldur Thráinsson: 1996, 'VP Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic', Linguistic Inquiry 27, 391-444.
23. Coopmans, Peter: 1989, 'Where Stylistic and Syntactic Processes Meet: Locative Inversion in English', Language 65, 728-751.
24. Czepluch, Hartmut: 1982, 'Case Theory and the Dative Construction' The Lingustic Review 2, 1-38.
25. de Hoop, Helen: 1992, Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.
26. den Dikken, Marcel: 1995, Particles, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. den Dikken, Marcel and Alma Naess: 1993, 'Case Dependencies: The Case of Predicate Inversion', The Linguistic Review 10, 303-334.
28. Diesing, Molly: 1990, The Syntactic Roots of Semantic Partition, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
29. Diesing, Molly: 1992a, 'Bare Plural Subjects and the Distribution of Logical Representations', Linguistic Inquiry 23, 353-380.
30. Diesing, Molly: 1992b, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
31. Diesing, Molly and Eloise Jelinek: 1995, 'Distributing Arguments', Natural Language Semantics 3(2), 123-176.
32. Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
33. Dowty, David: 1991, 'Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection', Language 67, 547-619.
34. Enç, Mürvet: 1991, 'The Semantics of Specificity', Linguistic Inquiry 22, 1-26.
35. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi: 1979, 'Discourse Constraints on Dative Movement', in Talmy Givon (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 441-468.
36. Ernst, Thomas: 1994, 'M-command and Precedence', Linguistic Inquiry 25, 327-35.
37. Fillmore, Charles J.: 1968, 'Lexical Entries for Verbs', Foundations of Language 4, 373-393.
38. Fillmore, Charles J.: 1972, 'Subjects, Speakers and Roles', in Donald Davidson and Gilbert Hannan (eds.), The Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1-24.
39. Foley, William A. and Robert D. van Valin: 1984, Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Fukui, Naoki and Margaret Speas: 1986, 'Specifiers and Projection', MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 128-172.
41. Goldberg, Adele E.: 1995, Constructions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
42. Greene, Georgia M.: 1976, Semantics and Syntactic Regularity, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
43. Gropen, Jess et al.: 1989, 'The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English', Language 65, 203-257.
44. Gruber, Jeffrey: 1965, Studies in Lexical Relations, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
45. Hartvigson, Hans H. and Leif K. Jakobsen: 1974, Inversion in Present Day English, Odense University Press, Odense.
46. Hoekstra, Teun and Rene Mulder: 1990, 'Unergatives as Copular Verbs: Locational and Existential Predication', Linguistic Review 7, 1-79.
47. Hopper, Paul: 1985, 'Causes and Affects', CLS 21: Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity, 67-88.
48. Hopper, Paul and Sandra Thompson: 1980, 'Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse', Language 56, 251-299.
49. Hornstein, Norbert: 1994, Logical Form, Blackwell, London.
50. Jackendoff, Ray: 1983, Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
51. Jackendoff; Ray: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
52. Jelinek, Eloise: 1995a, 'Argument Structure in Some Native American Languages', unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona.
53. Jelinek, Eloise: 1995b, 'The Compositionality of Argument Structure in Lummi', unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona.
54. Johnson, Kyle: 1991, 'Object Positions', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9(4), 577-636.
55. Karimi, Simin: 1996, 'On Object Positions: Accounting for Specific/Nonspecific Asymmetry', unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona.
56. Kayne, Richard: 1991, 'Facets of Romance Past Participle Agreement', in Paola Beninca (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85-103.
57. Keyser, Samuel J. and Thomas Roeper: 1992, 'Re: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis', Linguistic Inquiry 23(1), 89-126.
58. Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche: 1991, 'The Position of "Subjects"', Lingua 85, 211-58.
59. Koizumi, Masatoshi: 1993, 'Object Agreement Phrase and the Split VP Hypothesis', MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers on Case and Agreement, 99-148.
60. Kratzer, Angelica: 1988, 'Stage and Individual Level Predicates', Papers on Quantification, NSF Report, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
61. Kuroda, Sige-Yuki: 1972, 'The Categorical Judgement and the Thetic Judgement', Foundations of Language 9, 153-185.
62. Kuroda, Sige-Yuki: 1988, 'Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese', in William J. Poser (ed.), Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 103-143.
63. Ladusaw, William: 1994, 'Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong', in M. Harvey and L. Santelman (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV, Cornell University Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Ithaca, New York, pp. 220-229.
64. Lakoff, George: 1976, 'Towards Generative Semantics', in James McCawley (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground, Academic Press, New York, pp. 43-61.
65. Larson, Richard: 1988, 'On the Double Object Construction', Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335-392.
66. Larson, Richard: 1990, 'Double Objects Revisited: A Reply to Jackendoff, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 589-632.
67. Lasnik, Howard: 1992, 'Case and Expletives: Notes toward a Parametric Account', Linguistic Inquiry 23, 381-406.
68. Lasnik, Howard: 1995, 'Case and Expletives Revisited: On Greed and Other Human Failings', Linguistic Inquiry 26(4), 615-634.
69. Levin, Beth: 1993, English Verb Classes and Their Alternations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
70. Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport: 1992, 'The Lexical Semantics of Verbs of Motion: The Perspective from Unaccusativity', in I. M. Roca (ed.), Thematic Structure: Its Role in the Grammar, Mouton, Berlin, pp. 247-269.
71. Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav: 1995, Unacussatirity, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
72. Levin, Beth and Tova Rapoport: 1988, 'Lexical Subordination', Papers from the 24th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 275-89.
73. Mahajan, Anoop: 1992, 'The Specificity Condition and the CED', Linguistic Inquiry 23(3), 510-516.
74. May, Robert: 1977, 'The Grammar of Quantification', unpublished Ph.D. disseration, MIT.
75. May, Robert: 1985, Logical Form, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
76. Milsark, Gary: 1974, 'Existential Sentences in English', unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
77. Oehrle, Richard: 1976, 'The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation', unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
78. Pinker, Stephen: 1989, Learnibility and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
79. Ramchand, Gillian Catriona: 1992, 'Aspect Phrase in Modern Scottish Gaelic', in A. J. Schafer (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 23, Graduate Student Linguistic Association, Amherst, Massachusetts, pp. 415-429.
80. Ramchand, Gillian Catriona: 1997, Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
81. Rapoport, Tova: 1995, 'Specificity, Objects and Nominal Small Clauses', in Anna Cardinaletti and Maria Teresa Guasti (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 28: Small Clauses, Academic Press, New York, pp. 153-178.
82. Raposo, Eduardo and Juan Uriagereka: 1995, 'Two Types of Small Clauses (Toward a Syntax of Theme/Rheme Relations)', in Anna Cardinaletti and Maria Teresa Guasti (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 28: Small Clauses, Academic Press, New York, pp. 179-206.
83. Rappaport, Malka and Beth Levin: 1988, 'What to Do with Theta Roles', in Wendy Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21: Thematic Relations, Academic Press, New York, pp. 7-36.
84. Rochemont, Michael: 1986, Focus in Generative Grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
85. Salkoff, Morris: 1983, 'Bees Are Swarming in the Garden', Language 59, 288-346.
86. Stowell, Timothy: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure', unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
87. Sasse, Hans: 1987, 'The Thetic/Categorical Distinction Revisited', Linguistics 25, 511-580.
88. Saito, Mamoru: 1989, 'Scrambling as Semantically Vacuous A' Movement', in Mark Baltin and Anthony Kroch (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 182-200.
89. Stroik, Thomas: 1996, Minimalism, Scope and VP Structure, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
90. Tenny, Carol: 1994, Aspectual Roles and the Syntax and Semantics Interface, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
91. Travis, Lisa: 1991, 'Derived Objects, Inner Aspect and the Structure of VP', paper presented at NELS 22.
92. Watanabe, Akira: 1996, Case Absorption and WH-Agreement, Kluwer, Dordrecht.