The 3×3: Setting Up a Linguistic Toolkit for Teaching Academic Writing

Appliable Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 185-199

  Humphrey, Sally ^a   Martin, J R ^a   Dreyfus, Shooshi ^a   Mahboob, Ahmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187330381     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1935: Reprint in full 1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
2. Bonanno, H. and Jones, J. (2007). The MASUSProcedure: Measuring the Skills of University Students, a Diagnostic Assessment (3rd edn). Sydney: University of Sydney, Learning Centre.
3. Chen, Y and Foley, J. (2004). ‘Problems with the metaphorical reconstrual of meaning in Chinese EFL learners’ expositions’, in L. Ravelli and R. Lewis (eds), Analysing Academic Writing: Contextua,lized Frameworks. Continuum: London, UK, pp. 190-209.
4. Coffin, C. and Hewings, A. (2004). ‘IELTS as preparation for tertiary writing: distinctive interpersonal and textual strategies’, in L. Ravelli and R. Lewis (eds), Analysing Academic Writing: Contextua,lized Frameworks. Continuum: London, UK, pp. 153-71.
5. Derewianka, B. (2001). ‘Pedagogical grammars: their role in English language teaching’, in A. Burns and C. Coffin (eds), Analysing English in a Global Context. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 240-69.
6. Ellis, R. (2004). ‘Supporting genre-based literacy pedagogy with technology - The implications for the framing and classification of the pedagogy’, in L. Ravelli and R. Lewis (eds), Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualized Frameworks. Continuum: London, UK, pp. 210-32.
7. Halliday, M. A. K. (1991). ‘The notion of context in language education’, in T. Le and M. McCausland (eds), La,nguageEducation: Interaction a,ndDevelopment. Proceedings of the International conference held in Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 30 March-1 April. University of Tasmania, Launceston.
8. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (2006). ‘Retrospective on SFL and literacy’, in R. Whittiker, M. O’Donnell, and A. McCabe (eds), Language a,nd Literacy: Functional Approaches. London: Continuum, pp. 15-44.
9. Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). Language and Education, J. J. Webster(ed.) (Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, vol. 9). London: Continuum.
10. Halliday, M. A. K and Mathiessen M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London and New York: Cassell.
11. Halliday, M. A. K. and Mathiessen M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3ed edn). London: Arnold.
12. Hood, S. (2006). ‘The persuasive power of prosodies: radiating values in academic writing’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5, 37-49.
13. Hood, S. (2008). ‘Summary writing in academic contexts: implicating meaning in processes of change’. Linguistics a,nd Education 19 (4), 251-365.
14. Humphrey, S. (in press). ‘Modelling social affiliation and genre in the civic domain’, in A. Mahboob and N. Knight (eds), Directions in Appliable Linguistics. London: Continuum.
15. Iedema, R. (2004). Discourses of Comma,nd. Manuscripts, University of New South Wales.
16. Jones, J. (2007). ‘Multiliteracies for academic purposes: multimodality in textbook and computer-based learning materials in science at university’, in A. McCabe, M. O’Donnell and R. Whittaker (eds), Advances in La,nguage a,nd Education. London: Continuum, pp. 103-21.
17. Lee, S. (2009). ‘Attitude in undergraduate persuasive essays’. Prospect 23 (3), 43-58.
18. Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). ‘Literacy and learning across the curriculum: towards a model of register from secondary school teachers’, in R. Hasan and G. Williams (eds), Literacy in Society. London: Longman, pp. 232-78.
19. Mahboob, A., Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S. and Martin, J. R. (this volume). ‘Appliable linguistics and English language teaching: the Scaffolding Literacy in Adult and Tertiary Environments (SLATE) project’, in A. Mahboob and N. Knight (eds), Directions in Appliable Linguistics. London: Continuum.
20. Martin, J. R. (1992). ‘Macro-proposals: meaning by degree’, in W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds), Discourse Descriptions: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fundraising Text. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 359-95.
21. Martin, J. R. (2000). ‘Factoring out exchange: types of structure’, in M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill and F. Rock (eds), Working with Dialogue. Tubingen: Niemeyer, pp. 19-40.
22. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
23. Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Polias, J. and Dare, B. (2006). ‘Towards a pedagogical grammar’, in R. Whittiker, M. O’Donnell, and A. McCabe (eds), Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches. London: Continuum, pp. 123-43.
25. Rose, D. (2005). Learning to Read; Reading to Learn Teacher Resource Book. Sydney.
26. Ravelli, L. (2004). ‘Signalling the organization of written texts: Hyper-Themes in management and history essays’, in L. Ravelli and R. Lewis (eds), Analysing Academic Writing: ContextualizedFrameworks. Continuum: London, UK, pp. 105-30.
27. Stenglin, M. and Iedema, R. (2001). ‘How to analyse visual images: a guide for TESOL teachers’, in A. Burns and C. Coffin (eds), Analysing English in a Global Context,. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 194-208.
28. Taylor, C. and Drury, H. (2007). ‘An integrated approach to teaching writing in the sciences’, in A. Brew and J. Sachs (eds), Tra,nsforming a University: The Scholarship ofTeaching and Learning in Practice. Sydney: Sydney University Press, pp. 117-25.
29. Veel, R. (1997). ‘Learning how to mean - scientifically speaking: apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school’, in F. Christie and J. R. Martin (eds), Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell, pp. 161-95.
30. Wignell, P. (2007). On the Discourse of Social Science. Darwin, NT. Charles Darwin University Press.
31. Woodward-Kron, R. (2005). ‘The role of genre and embedded genres in tertiary students’ writing’. Prospect 20 (3), 24-41.