Pleasure versus Efficiency in User Interfaces: Towards an Involvement Framework

Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 94-108

  De Angeli, Antonella ^a   Lynch, Paula ^a   Johnson, Graham I ^a  

^a NCR Self Service   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85174122985     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203302279-15     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Baber, C., Johnson, G.I. and Cleaver, D., 1997. Factors affecting users’ choice of words in speech-based interaction with public technology. In International Journal of Speech Technology, 2, 1, pp. 45-60.
2. Ball, G. and Breese, J., 2000. Emotion and personality in a conversational agent. In Embodied conversational agents. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E. (Eds), The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
3. Bernsen, N.O., Dybkjær, H. and Dybkjær L., 1998. Designing interactive speech systems. Springer Verlag, London.
4. Card, S., Moran, T. and Newell, A., 1983. The psychology of human-computerinteraction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Cassell, J., 2000. Embodied conversational interface agents. In Communications of the ACM, 43, 4, April 2000, pp. 70-78.
6. Cassell, J., Sullivan J.,Prevost, S. and Churchill, E., 2000. Embodied conversationalagents. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
7. Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R., 1992. NEO PI-R: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Coventry, L. and Johnson, G.I., 1999. More than meets the eye: Usability and iris verification at the ATM interface. In Human-Computer Interaction: Interact 99, Proceedings, 2. Brewster, S., Cawsey, A. and Cockton, G. (Eds), IOS Press/IFIP, pp. 151-156.
9. De Angeli, A., 1997. Valutare i sistemi flessibili: un approccio globale alla HCI. Ph.D. Thesis, Psychology Dept., University of Trieste.
10. De Angeli, A., Gerbino, W., Nodari, E. and Petrelli, D., 1999. From tools to friends: Where is the borderline? In Proceedings of the UM’99 Workshop on Attitude,Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction. Banff, Canada, June 23, pp. 1-10.
11. De Angeli, A., Matera, M., Costabile, F., Garzotto, F. and Paolini, P., 2000. Validating the SUE Inspection Techniques. In Proceedings of AVI2000, June 23-27, Palermo, Italy.
12. Frøkjær, E., Hertzum, M. and Hornbæk, K., 2000. Measuring usability: Are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated. In CHI 2000 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press, NY, pp. 345-352.
13. ISO-International Standard Organisation, 1991. ISO 9241: Ergonomics requirements foroffice work with visual display terminal (VDT)-Parts 1-17.
14. Johnson, G.I., 1993. Spatial operational sequence diagrams in usability investigations. In Contemporary Ergonomics 1993. Lovesey, E.J. (Ed.), Taylor & Francis, London.
15. Johnson, G.I., 1995. Consumer reactions to voice at the ATM. In Proceedings of the '95 Annual AT&T Human Factors & Behavioural Science Symposium. AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ, pp. 54-58.
16. Johnson, G.I., 1996. The usability checklist approach revisited. In Usability evaluation inindustry. Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A. and McClelland, I.L. (Eds), Taylor & Francis, London.
17. Johnson, G.I., 1996b. Exploring novel banking user interfaces: Usability challenges in design and evaluation. Invited address, IEEE: Interfaces-The leading edge, C5 Group-Human Computer Interaction; Digest 96/126.
18. Johnson, G.I. and Briggs, P., 1994. Question-asking and verbal protocols-Qualitative methods of usability evaluation. In Qualitative methods in organisation research: Apractical guide. Cassell, C. and Symon, G. (Eds), Sage Publications, London.
19. Johnson, G.I. and Westwater, M.G., 1996. Usability and self-service information technology: Cognitive engineering in product design and evaluation. In AT&T Technical Journal, Jan/Feb. AT&T, NJ, pp. 64-73.
20. Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A. and Clelland, I.L., 1996. Usabilityevaluation in industry. Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A. and McClelland, I.L. (Eds), Taylor & Francis, London.
21. Kelly, K., 1998. New rules for the new economy. Fourth Estate, London.
22. nd, Sienna.
23. Lynch, P., Emmott, S.E. and Johnson, G.I., 1999. The NCR Knowledge Lab. In Human-Computer Interaction: Interact 99, Proceedings, 2. Brewster, S., Cawsey, A. and Cockton, G. (Eds), IOS Press/IFIP, pp. 229-230.
24. Moon, Y. and Nass, C., 1996. How “real” are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. In Communication Research, 23, 6, pp. 651-674.
25. Morkes, J.Kernal, H.K. and Nass, C., 1999. Effects of humour in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. In Human-Computer Interaction, 14, pp. 395-435.
26. Nass C., Moon Y., Fogg, J., Reeves, B. and Dryer, D.C., 1995. Can computer personalities be human personalities? In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, pp. 223-239.
27. Nass, C., Moon, Y. and Carney, P., 1999. Are respondents polite to computers? Social desirability and direct responses to computers. In Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 5, pp. 1093-1110.
28. Nass, C., Moon, Y. and Green, N., 1997. Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. In Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 10, pp. 864-876.
29. Nass, C. and Lee, K.M., 2000. Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? An experimental test of similarity-attraction. In CHI 2000 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press, NY, pp. 329-336.
30. Nielsen, J., 1993. Usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
31. Norman, D.A., 1991. Cognitive artifacts. In Designing Interaction: psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Carroll, J.M. (Ed.),University Press, Cambridge.
32. Picard, R., 1997. Affective computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
33. Reeves, B. and Rickenberg, R., 2000. The effects of animated character on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces. In CHI 2000 Conference Proceedings. ACM Press, NY, pp. 49-56.
34. Reeves, B. and Nass, C., 1996. The media equation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
35. Westwater, M.G. and Johnson, G.I., 1995. Comparing heuristic, user-centred and checklist-based evaluation approaches. In Contemporary Ergonomics 1995. Richardson, S. (Ed.), Taylor & Francis, London.
36. WordNet 1.6: available via http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu