Factors affecting users' choice of words in speech-based interaction with public technology

International Journal of Speech Technology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 45-59

  Baber, C ^a   Johnson, G I ^b   Cleaver, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NCR   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automatic speech recognition; Human factors; Public technology; Vocabulary selection

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SPEECH PROCESSING;

VISUAL/AUDITORY FEEDBACK; VOCABULARY SELECTION;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 0031144097     PISSN: 13812416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02539822     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baber, C. (1991). Speech Technology in Control Room Systems: A Human Factors Perspective. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
2. Baber, C. (1993). Developing interactive speech technology. In C. Baber and J.M. Noyes (Eds.), Interactive Speech Technology. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 1-18.
3. Baber, C. and Stammers, R.B. (1989). Is it natural to talk to computers: An experiment using the Wizard of Oz technique. In E.D. Megaw (Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 234-239.
4. Baber, C., Stammers, R.B., and Usher, D.M. (1990). Error correction requirements in ASR. In E.J. Lovesey (Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics 1990. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 454-459.
5. Brems, D.J., Rabin, M.D., and Waggett, J.L. (1995). Using natural language conventions in the user interface design of automatic speech recognition systems. Human Factors, 37(2):265-282.
6. Bunt, H.C., Leopold, F.F., Muller, H.F., and van Katwijk, A.F.V. (1978). In search of pragmatic principles in man-machine dialogues. IPO Annual Progress Report 13. Eindhoven: Institute voor Perceptie Onderzoek, pp. 94-98.
7. Burford, B.C. and Baber, C. (1994). A user-centred evaluation of a simulated adaptive autoteller. In S.A. Robertson (Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics 1994. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 46-51.
8. Button, G. (1990). Going up a blind alley: Conflating conversation analysis and computational modelling. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert, and D. Frohlich (Eds.), Computers and Conversation. London: Academic Press, pp. 67-90.
9. Button, G. and Sharrock, W. (1995). On simulacrums of conversation: Toward a clarification of the relevance of conversation analysis for human-computer interaction. In P.J. Thomas (Ed.), The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-125.
10. Cookson, S. (1988). Final evaluation of VODIS: Voice operated database inquiry system. Proceedings Speech'88-7th. FASE Symposium. Edinburgh: Institute of Acoustics, pp. 1311-1320.
11. Dillon, T.W., Norcio, A.F., and DeHaemer, M.J. (1993). Spoken language interaction: Effects of vocabulary size and experience on user efficiency and acceptability. In G. Salvendy and M.J. Smith (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction: Software and Hardware Interfaces. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 140-145.
12. Fraser, N.M. and Gilbert, G.N. (1991). Simulating speech systems. Computer Speech and Language, 5:81-99.
13. Giles, H. and Powisland, P.F. (1975). Speech Styles and Social Evaluation. London: Academic Press.
14. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and communication. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
15. Hauptmann, A.G. and Rudnicky, A.I. (1988). Talking to computers: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25:583-604.
16. Hollingum, J. and Cassford, G. (1988). Speech Technology at Work. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Kamm, C. (1994). User interfaces for voice applications. In D.B. Roe and J.G. Wilpon (Eds.), Voice Communication between Humans and Machines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 422-442.
18. Leiser, R.G. (1989). Exploiting convergence to improve natural language understanding. Interacting with Computers, 1:284-298.
19. Noyes, J.M., Baber, C., and Prankish, C.R. (1992). Industrial applications of ASR. Journal of the American Voice I/O Society, 12:51-68.
20. Peckham, J. (1989). VODIS-a voice operated database enquiry system. In J. Peckham (Ed.), Recent Developments and Applications of Natural Language Processing. London: Kogan Page, pp. 117-128.
21. Richards, M.A. and Underwood, K.M. (1984). Talking to machines: How are people naturally inclined to speak? In E.D. Megaw (Ed.), Contemporary Ergonomics 1984. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 63-67.
22. Ringle, M.D. and Halstead-Nussloch, R. (1989). Shaping user input: A strategy for natural language dialogue design. Interacting with Computers, 1:227-244.
23. Rogers, Y. (1989). Evaluating the meaningfulness of icon sets to represent command operations. In M.D. Harrison and A.F. Monk (Eds.), People and Computers: Designing for usability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 586-603.
24. Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1985). Relevance: Communication and Cooperation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
26. Waterworth, J.A. (1982). Man-machine speech dialogue acts. Applied Ergonomics, 13:203-207.
27. Wooffitt, R. and MacDermid, C. (1995). Wizards and social control. In P.J. Thomas (Ed.), The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126-141.
28. Zoltan, E., Weeks, G.D., and Ford, W.R. (1982). Natural-language communication with computers: A comparison of voice and keyboard inputs. In G. Johannsen and J.E. Rijnsdorp (Eds.), Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 255-260.
29. Zoltan-Ford, E. (1984). Reducing the variability in natural language interactions with computers. Proceedings of the 28th. Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 768-772.
30. Zoltan-Ford, E. (1991). How to get people to say and type what computers can understand. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34:527-547.