The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Engineering

Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 217-237

  Wankat, Phillip C ^a   Felder, Richard M ^b   Smith, Karl A ^c   Oreovicz, Frank S ^d  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SUCCEED Engineering Education Coalition   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85168898044     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003444268-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Adams, R.S., and C.J. Atman. (2000). “Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes: An Illustration of Iteration.” Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Annual Conference. Available on CD. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
2. Angelo, T.A., and K.P. Cross. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bloom, B.S., M.D. Engelhart, E.J. Furst, W.H. Hill, and D.R. Krathwohl. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.
4. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
5. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994). Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Davidson, C.I., and S.A. Ambrose. (1994). The New Professor’s Handbook: A Guide to Teaching and Research in Engineering and Science. Bolton, MA: Anker.
7. Ercolano, V. (April 1996). “Designing Freshmen.” ASEE Prism: 20-25.
8. Felder, R.M. (1994). “The Myth of the Superhuman Professor.” Journal of Engineering Education 83(2): 105-110.
9. Felder, R.M. (2000). “The Scholarship of Teaching.” Chemical Engineering Education 34(2): 144-145+.
10. Glassick, C.E., M.T. Huber, and G.I. Maeroff. (1997). Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. Special Report of The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Grayson, L.P. (1993). The Making of an Engineer: An Illustrated History of Engineering Education in the United States and Canada. New York: Wiley.
12. Haller, C.R., V.J. Gallagher, T.L. Weldon, and R.M. Felder. (2000). “Dynamics of Peer Interaction in Cooperative Learning Workgroups.” Journal of Engineering Education 89(3): 285-293.
13. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, No. 4. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
14. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith. (1998a). Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. 2nd ed. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
15. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith. (July/August 1998b). “Cooperative Learning Returns to College: What Evidence Is There That It Works?" Change 30(4): 26-35.
16. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and K.A. Smith. (1998c). “Maximizing Instruction Through Cooperative Learning.” ASEE Prism 7(6): 24-29.
17. Koen, B.V. (1985). Definition of the Engineering Method. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
18. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. National Science Foundation. (2000). Women, Minorities, and Persons With Disabilities in Science and Engineering 2000. NSF 00-327. Arlington, VA: Author.
20. Perry, W.G., Jr. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
21. Reis, R.M. (1997). Tomorrow’s Professor: Preparing for Academic Careers in Science and Engineering. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
22. Reynolds, T.S., and B.E. Seely. (1993). “Striving for Balance: A Hundred Years of the American Society for Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 82(2): 136-151.
23. Seely, B.E. (1999). “The Other Re-Engineering of Engineering Education, 1900-1965.” Journal of Engineering Education 88(3): 285-294.
24. Seymour, E., and N.M. Hewitt. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.
25. Sheppard, S.D. (2001). “The Compatibility (or Incompatibility) of How We Teach Engineering Design and Analysis.” International Journal of Engineering Education 17(4): 440-445.
26. Springer, L., M.E. Stanne, and S.S. Donovan. (1999). “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 69(1): 21-51.
27. Starfield, A.M., K.A. Smith, and A.L. Bleloch. (1994). How to Model It: Problem Solving for the Computer Age. Edina, MN: Burgess International Group.
28. Stice, J.E., R.M. Felder, D.R. Woods, and A. Rugarcia. (2000). “The Future of Engineering Education: 4. Learning How to Teach.” Chemical Engineering Education 34(2): 118-127.
29. Tobias, S. (1990). They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
30. Wales, C.E., and A. Nardi. (1982). “Teaching Decision-Making With Guided Design.” IDEA Paper No. 9. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
31. Wankat, PC. (1999). “An Analysis of the Articles in the Journal of Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 88(1): 37-42.
32. Wankat, PC., and F.S. Oreovicz. (1993). Teaching Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Available free at http://unitflops.ecn.purdue.edu/ChE/News/Book/.)