The Compatibility (or Incompatibility) of How we Teach Engineering Design and Analysis

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 17, Issue 4-5, 2001, Pages 440-445

  Sheppard, Sheri D ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035647014     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. S. D. Sheppard and R. Jenison, Freshmen engineering design experiences: an organizational framework, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 13, 3 (1997) pp. 190-197.
2. S. Sheppard, R. Jenison, A. Agogino, M. Brereton, L. Bucciarelli, J. Dally, J. Demel, C. Dym, D. Evans, R. Faste, M. Henderson, P. Minderman, J. Mitchell, A. Oladipupo, M. Piket-May, R. Quinn, T. Regan and J. Wujek, Examples of freshman design education, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 13, 4 (1997) pp. 248-261.
3. D. Larson, K. Collier, J. Hatfield and S. Howell, Student portfolios and assessment in a sequence of interdisciplinary design classes, ABET 1996 Annual Meeting, Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 1996, San Diego, CA.
4. Clive L. Dym, Learning engineering: design, languages, and experiences, J. Eng. Educ., 88, 2 (April 1999) pp. 145-148. A longer version of this paper is available on http://www2.hmc.edu/~dym/ EngrngEd.html.
5. Engineering Education Coalitions (NSF89-107).
6. ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000), http://mvw.abet.org/abethomepage.html
7. J. H. McMasters and S. D. Ford, An industry view of enhancing design education, ASEE Engineering Education, 80, 5 (July/August, 1990) pp. 526-539.
8. J. H. McMasters and B. J. White, Report on the Second Boeing-University Workshop on an Industry Role in Enhancing Engineering Education, The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA, (July 18-19, 1994).
9. L. Carlson, J. Sullivan, Hands-on engineering: learning by doing in the integrated teaching and learning program, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 15, 1, pp. 20-31.
10. E. Seymour and N. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving. Factors contributing to high attrition rates among science, mathematics & engineering undergraduate majors: final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions, University of Colorado, April, (1994).
11. J. Stice, A first step toward improved teaching, Engineering Education, 66, 5, (Feb. 1976) pp. 394-398.
12. D. N. Perkins, What constructivism demands of the learner, in Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: a conversation, LEA Associates, Hillsdale, NY, (1992) pp. 161-165.
13. J. Dixon, 'Design and analysis: a conflict of interest?' J. Eng. Educ., 54, 7 (March, 1964) pp. 243-245.
14. C. Pionke, J. Parsons, J. Seat, F. Weber and D. Yoder, Balancing capability, enthusiasm, and methodology in a first year design program, accepted for J. Eng. Educ.
15. B. Linder and W. Flowers, Student responses to impromptu estimation questions, Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DTM-1518, Irvine, CA, August, 1996.
16. Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, (1973).
17. S. Kuhn, Learning from the architecture studio: implications for project-based pedagogy, accepted for J. Eng. Educ.
18. L. Schulman, The theory, practice and the education of professionals, Elementary School Journal, 98, 5, 1998 pp. 511-526.
19. Lee Schulman, Anne Colby, Pedagogies of the Professions: A Program for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Oct. 9, 1998, pp. 511-528.