Expectation maximization and posterior constraints

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Graça, João V ^a   Ganchev, Kuzman ^b   Taskar, Ben ^b  

^a INESC ID   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; MACHINE TRANSLATION; MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE;

ESTIMATION PROCEDURES; EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION; EXPECTATIONS MAXIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; EXPECTED LIKELIHOODS; GRAPHICAL MODEL; LATENT VARIABLE; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PRIORI INFORMATION; SIMPLE++; STATISTIC MODELING;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

EID: 85162012703     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. D. Bertsekas. Nonlinear Programming. Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA, 1999.
2. P. F. Brown, S. A. Della Pietra, V. J. Della Pietra, M. J. Goldsmith, J. Hajic, R. L. Mercer, and S. Mohanty. But dictionaries are data too. In Proc. HLT, 1993.
3. Peter F. Brown, Stephen Della Pietra, Vincent J. Della Pietra, and Robert L. Mercer. The mathematic of statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):263-311, 1994.
4. O. Chapelle, B. Schölkopf, and A. Zien, editors. Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
5. I. Csiszar. I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. The Annals of Probability, 3, 1975.
6. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39(1):1-38, 1977.
7. Alexander Fraser and Daniel Marcu. Measuring word alignment quality for statistical machine translation. Comput. Linguist., 33(3):293-303, 2007.
8. Nir Friedman, Ori Mosenzon, Noam Slonim, and Naftali Tishby. Multivariate information bottleneck. In UAI, 2001.
9. Michael I. Jordan, Zoubin Ghahramani, Tommi Jaakkola, and Lawrence K. Saul. An introduction to variational methods for graphical models. Machine Learning, 37(2):183-233, 1999. (Pubitemid 30544678)
10. Philipp Koehn. Europarl: A multilingual corpus for evaluation of machine translation, 2002.
11. P. Lambert, A.De Gispert, R. Banchs, and J. B. Mariño. Guidelines for word alignment evaluation and manual alignment. In Language Resources and Evaluation, Volume 39, Number 4, pages 267-285, 2005. (Pubitemid 44075809)
12. Percy Liang, Ben Taskar, and Dan Klein. Alignment by agreement. In Proc. HLT-NAACL, 2006.
13. Gideon S. Mann and Andrew McCallum. Simple, robust, scalable semi-supervised learning via expectation regularization. In Proc. ICML, 2007.
14. R. M. Neal and G. E. Hinton. A new view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse and other variants. In M. I. Jordan, editor, Learning in Graphical Models, pages 355-368. Kluwer, 1998.
15. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. Improved statistical alignment models. In ACL, 2000.
16. Franz Josef Och and Hermann Ney. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. Comput. Linguist., 29(1):19-51, 2003. (Pubitemid 37049767)
17. Noah A. Smith and Jason Eisner. Annealing structural bias in multilingual weighted grammar induction. In Proc. ACL, pages 569-576, 2006.
18. Martin Szummer and Tommi Jaakkola. Information regularization with partially labeled data. In Proc. NIPS, pages 1025-1032, 2003.
19. L. G. Valiant. The complexity of computing the permanent. Theoretical Computer Science, 8:189-201, 1979.
20. Stephan Vogel, Hermann Ney, and Christoph Tillmann. Hmm-based word alignment in statistical translation. In Proc. COLING, 1996.