What does “evaluation” mean for the nime community?

Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 156-161

  Barbosa, Jeronimo ^a   Malloch, Joseph ^b   Huot, Stéphane ^c   Wanderley, Marcelo M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Digital Musical Instruments; Evaluation; Metareview; Methodology; Terminology

Indexed keywords

'CURRENT; DIGITAL MUSICAL INSTRUMENT; EVALUATION; METAREVIEW; METHODOLOGY;

EID: 85160284130     PISSN: 22204792     EISSN: 22204806     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. D. Arfib, J. M. Couturier, and L. Kessous. Expressiveness and digital musical instrument design. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1):125–136, June 2005.
2. J. Barbosa, F. Calegario, V. Teichrieb, G. Ramalho, and P. McGlynn. Considering Audience’s View Towards an Evaluation Methodology for Digital Musical Instruments. In NIME ’12 Proceedings of the 2012 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2012.
3. L. Barkhuus and J. a. Rode. From Mice to Men-24 Years of Evaluation in CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–16, 2007.
4. D. Birnbaum, R. Fiebrink, J. W. Malloch, and M. M. Wanderley. Towards a dimension space for musical devices. In NIME ’05 Proceedings of the 2005 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 192–195, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2005.
5. D. M. Campbell. Evaluating musical instruments. Physics Today, 67(4):35–40, Apr. 2014.
6. S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and G. G. Robertson. A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(2):99–122, Apr. 1991.
7. A. Fyans, M. Gurevich, and P. Stapleton. Examining the spectator experience. In NIME ’10 Proceedings of the 2010 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 1–4, 2010.
8. M. Ghamsari, A. Pras, and M. M. Wanderley. Combining musical tasks and improvisation in evaluating novel Digital Musical Instruments. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Music Multidisciplinary Research, pages 506–515, Marseille, France, 2013.
9. S. Greenberg and B. Buxton. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In CHI ’08 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, page 111, 2008.
10. A. Hunt and R. Kirk. Mapping strategies for musical performance. In Marcelo M. Wanderley and Marc Battier, editor, Trends in Gestural Control of Music, volume 21, pages 231–258. IRCAM, Centre Pompidou, Paris, France, 2000.
11. A. Hunt, M. M. Wanderley, and M. Paradis. The Importance of Parameter Mapping in Electronic Instrument Design. In NIME ’02 Proceedings of the 2002 international conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 429–440, Dublin, Ireland, Dec. 2003. Routledge.
12. A. Johnston. Beyond Evaluation: Linking Practice and Theory in New Musical Interface Design. In NIME ’11 Proceedings of the 2011 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 280–283, Oslo, Norway, 2011.
13. S. Jordà. Digital lutherie: crafting musical computers for new musics performance and improvisation. PhD thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2005.
14. S. Jordà and S. Mealla. A Methodological Framework for Teaching, Evaluating and Informing NIME Design with a Focus on Expressiveness and Mapping. In NIME ’14 Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pages 233–238, London, UK, 2014.
15. T. Kvifte and A. Jensenius. Towards a Coherent Terminology and Model of Instrument Description and Design. In NIME ’06: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pages 220–225, Paris, France, 2006.
16. S. O’Modhrain. A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments. Computer Music Journal, 35(1):28–42, 2011.
17. B. Shneiderman. Creativity Support Tools: Accelerating Discovery and Innovation. Communications of the ACM, 50(12):20–32, 2007.
18. D. Stowell, A. Robertson, N. Bryan-Kinns, and M. D. Plumbley. Evaluation of live human-computer music-making: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67(11):960–975, 2009.
19. R. Vertegaal. An Evaluation of Input Devices for Timbre Space Navigation. PhD thesis, University of Bradford, 1994.
20. M. M. Wanderley and N. Orio. Evaluation of Input Devices for Musical Expression: Borrowing Tools from HCI. Computer Music Journal, 26:62–76, 2002.
21. D. Wessel and M. Wright. Problems and Prospects for Intimate Musical Control of Computers. Computer Music Journal, 26(3):11–22, Sept. 2002.