A methodological framework for teaching, evaluating and informing nime design with a focus on expressiveness and mapping

Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 233-238

  Jordà, Sergi ^a   Sebastián, Mealla C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Design; Evaluation; Expressiveness; Framework; Mapping; Methods; NIME; Teaching

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; SMARTPHONES;

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; DESIGN-PROCESS; DIGITAL MUSIC INSTRUMENTS; EVALUATION; EXPRESSIVENESS; FRAMEWORK; METHOD; METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; NIME; PERFORMANCE;

MAPPING;

EID: 84978717427     PISSN: 22204792     EISSN: 22204806     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Pure data floss manual, http://en.flossmanuals.net/pure-data/. 2012.
2. D. Arfib, J.-M. Couturier, L. Kessous, V. Verfaille, et al. Strategies of mapping between gesture data and synthesis model parameters using perceptual spaces. Organised Sound, 7(2):127–144, 2002.
3. J. Barbosa, F. Calegario, F. Magalhães, V. Teichrieb, G. Cabral, and G. Ramalho. Towards an evaluation methodology for digital music instruments considering performerś view: a case study. In Proceedings of 13th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music, 2011.
4. V. Bellotti, M. Back, W. K. Edwards, R. E. Grinter, A. Henderson, and C. Lopes. Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers. In Proc. of CHI, pages 415–422. ACM, 2002.
5. J. Chadabe. Interactive composing: An overview. Computer Music Journal, 8(1):22–27, 1984.
6. P. Cook. Principles for designing computer music controllers. In Proc. of NIME, pages 1–4. National University of Singapore, 2001.
7. C. Dobrian and D. Koppelman. The ’e’ in nime: Musical expression with new computer interfaces. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, NIME ’06, pages 277–282, Paris, France, 2006. IRCAM; Centre Pompidou.
8. R. A. Fiebrink. Real-time human interaction with supervised learning algorithms for music composition and performance. Princeton University, 2011.
9. S. Gelineck and S. Serafin. Longitudinal evaluation of the integration of digital musical instruments into existing compositional work processes. Journal of New Music Research, 41(3):259–276, 2012.
10. N. Gillian, R. B. Knapp, and S. O´ Modhrain. A machine learning toolbox for musician computer interaction. Proc. of NIME, 2011.
11. M. Gurevich and A. Cavan Fyans. Digital musical interactions: PerformerâĂŞsystem relationships and their perception by spectators. Organised Sound, 16:166–175, 6 2011.
12. M. Gurevich, B. Knapp, and S. Jordà. A Workshop on NIME Education. In Proc. of NIME, 2011.
13. A. Hunt, M. M. Wanderley, and M. Paradis. The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design. Journal of New Music Research, 32(4):429–440, 2003.
14. S. Jordà. Digital lutherie: Crafting musical computers for new musics performance and improvisation. PhD diss., Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Departament de Tecnologia, 2005.
15. S. Jordà. On stage: the reactable and other musical tangibles go real. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 1(3):268–287, 2008.
16. C. Kiefer. Multiparametric interfaces for fine-grained control of digital music. PhD thesis, University of Sussex, 2012.
17. P. D. Lehrman and T. M. Ryan. Bridging the Gap Between Art and Science Education Through Teaching Electronic Musical Instrument Design. In Proc. of NIME, pages 136–139, 2005.
18. M. Lyons and S. Fels. Creating new interfaces for musical expression. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2013 Courses, page 17. ACM, 2013.
19. A. Marquez-Borbon, M. Gurevich, A. C. Fyans, and P. Stapleton. Designing digital musical interactions in experimental contexts. contexts, 16(20):21, 2011.
20. S. O’Modhrain. A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments. Computer Music Journal, 35(1):28–42, 2011.
21. J. Pressing. Cybernetic issues in interactive performance systems. Computer music journal, 14(1):12–25, 1990.
22. M. Puckette et al. Pure data: another integrated computer music environment. Proceedings of the Second Intercollege Computer Music Concerts, pages 37–41, 1996.
23. S. Rafaeli. Interactivity: From new media to communication. Sage annual review of communication research: Advancing communication science, 16:110–134, 1988.
24. J. Ryan. Some remarks on musical instrument design at steim. Contemporary music review, 6(1):3–17, 1991.
25. D. Svanaes. Philosophy of Interaction. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark, 2013.
26. K. Tahiroğlu. An exploration on mobile interfaces with adaptive mapping strategies in pure data. In Proceedings of the 4th International Pure Data Convention. Bauhaus Universität, Weimar, 2011.
27. B. Verplank, C. Sapp, and M. Mathews. A Course on Controllers. In Proc. of NIME, pages 7–10, 2001.
28. M. Waisvisz. On gestural controllers. 1999.
29. M. Wanderley and M. Battier. Trends in gestural control of music. Institut de recherche et coordination acoustique musique éd., prod., 2000.
30. M. M. Wanderley and N. Orio. Evaluation of input devices for musical expression: Borrowing tools from hci. Computer Music Journal, 26(3):62–76, 2002.
31. M. Wright. Open sound control-a new protocol for communicationg with sound synthesizers. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Computer Music Conference, pages 101–104, 1997.