Considering audience's view towards an evaluation methodology for digital musical instruments

Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Barbosa, Jerônimo ^a   Calegario, Filipe ^a   Teichrieb, Veronica ^a   Ramalho, Geber ^a   McGlynn, Patrick ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Digital musical instruments; Empirical methods; Evaluation methodology; Illusio; Quantitative; Usability testing and evaluation

Indexed keywords

INSTRUMENT TESTING; MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS;

DIGITAL MUSIC INSTRUMENTS; DIGITAL MUSICAL INSTRUMENT; EMPIRICAL METHOD; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; ILLUSIO; INCREMENTAL DEVELOPMENT; MUSICAL PERFORMANCE; QUANTITATIVE; USABILITY TESTING AND EVALUATION; USER FEEDBACK;

MUSIC;

EID: 85029079396     PISSN: 22204792     EISSN: 22204806     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. E. Adams, Fundamentals of Game Design, 2nd Edition. New Riders, (2010).
2. J. Barbosa, F. Calegario, F. Magalhães, V. Teichrieb, G. Ramalho, and G. Cabral, “Towards an evaluation methodology for digital music instruments considering performer’s view: a case study,” in Proceedings of 13th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music, 2011.
3. V. Bellotti, M. Back, W. K. Edwards, R. E. Grinter, A. Henderson, and C. Lopes, “Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers,” in CHI ’02 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, (2002).
4. T. Davis. "Towards a Relational Understanding of the Performance Ecosystem". Organised Sound, 16, (2011).
5. J. Freeman and M. Godfrey. “Technology, real-time notation, and audience participation in flock,” in International Computer Music Conference, (2008).
6. A. Fyans and M. Gurevich, “Spectator understanding of error in performance,” in Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, p. 3955, (2009).
7. A. Fyans and M. Gurevich. “Perceptions of Skill in Performances with Acoustic and Electronic Instruments,” in NIME ’11 Proc. of the 2011 Conference on New interfaces for musical expression, no. June, pp. 495-498, (2011).
8. A. Fyans, and P. Stapleton. “Examining the spectator experience,” in NIME ’10 Proceedings of the 2010 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, pp. 1-4, (2010).
9. M. Gurevich, A. Fyans. Digital Musical Interactions: Performer–system relationships and their perception by spectators. Organised Sound, 16(02), pp.166-175. (2011).
10. W. Hsu and M. Sosnick. “Evaluating interactive music systems: An HCI approach,” Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), pp. 25-28, (2009).
11. J. Malloch, D. Birnbaum, E. Sinyor, and M.M. Wanderley, “Towards a New Conceptual Framework for Digital Musical Instruments,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, p. 49–52, (2006).
12. M. Marshall, “Physical interface design for digital musical instruments,” Ph.D. Thesis. McGill University, (2010).
13. E. Miranda and M. Wanderley. New Digital Musical Instruments: Control and Interaction beyond the Keyboard. AR Editions, (2006).
14. S. O’Modhrain. “A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments,” Computer Music Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 28–42, (2011).
15. J. Radbourne, K. Johanson, H. Glow, and T. White. “The Audience Experience: Measuring Quality in the Performing Arts,” International Journal of Arts Management, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 16-29, (2009).
16. S. Reeves, S. Benford, C. O’Malley, and M. Fraser. “Designing the spectator experience,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI ’05, p. 741, (2005).
17. W. Schloss, “Using Contemporary Technology in Live Performance: The Dilemma of the Performer,” Journal of New Music Research, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 239-242, (2003).
18. D. Stowell, A. Robertson, N. Bryan-Kinns, and M.D. Plumbley, “Evaluation of live human–computer musicmaking: Quantitative and qualitative approaches,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 67, (2009).
19. M. Wanderley, “Instrumentos Musicais Digitais: Gestos, Sensores e Interfaces,” Em Busca da Mente Musical, Editora da Universidade Federal do Paraná, (2006).
20. L. Wood, “Semi-structured interviewing for user-centered design,” interactions, vol. 4, p. 48–61, (1997).
21. C. Dyer, “Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide to Methods and Statistics”. Malden, MA: Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (2006).
22. Chadabe, J. The Past and Promise of Electronic Music. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1997.
23. 23.Page-Bucci, H. The value of Likert scales in measuring attitudes of online learners. http://www.hkadesigns.co.uk/websites/msc/reme/likert.htm, (2003).