Children as Instructional Designers: Apprenticeship and Evaluation in the Learning Science by Design Project

Curriculum, Plans, and Processes in Instructional Design: International Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 115-130

  Kafai, Yasmin B ^a   Ching, Cynthia Carter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142590153     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410610560-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., and the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding:Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271-311.
2. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
3. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
4. Brown, A., and Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Carver, S., Lehrer, R., Connell, T., and Erickson, J. (1992). Learning by hypermedia design: Issues of assessments and implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27, 385-404.
6. Ching, C. C. (2000). Apprenticeship, learning and technology: Children as oldtimers and newcomers in the culture of learning through design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
7. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., and Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction:Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Erickson, J., and Lehrer, R. (1998). The evolution of critical standards as students design hypermedia documents. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3 and 4), 351-386.
9. Galas, C. (1997-1998). From presentation to programming: Designing something different, not the same thing differently. Learning and Leading With Technology, 25(4), 18-21.
10. Hall, R., and Stevens, R. (1995). Making space: A comparison of mathematical work in school and professional design practices. In S. L. Star (Ed.), The cultures of computing (pp. 118-145). London: Blackwell.
11. Harel, I. (1991). Children designers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Harel, I., and Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1-30.
13. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., and Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.
14. Hutchins, E. (1993). Learning to navigate. In S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice:Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 35-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as context for children’s learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Kafai, Y. B. (1996). Learning science by design: Developing information-rich learning environments in science for young software designers (National Science Foundation No. REC-9632695). Los Angeles:University of California, Los Angeles.
17. Kafai, Y. B., Ching, C. C., and Marshall, S. (1998). Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Computers and Education, 29, 117-126.
18. Kafai, Y. B., and Harel, I. (1991). Children’s learning through consulting: When mathematical ideas, programming knowledge, instructional design, and playful discourse are intertwined. In I. Harel and S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 85-110). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York:Cambridge University Press.
20. Marshall, S. (2000). Planning in context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
21. Norman, D. A., and Draper, S. W. (Eds.). (1986). User-centered system design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design- based modeling approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429-502.
23. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Rogoff, B. (1993). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, and A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Boston: Cambridge University Press.
25. Roth, W. M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79, 475-502.
26. Roth, W. M. (1996). Art and artifact of children’s designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 129-166.
27. Roth, W. M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
28. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., and Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Schön, D. (1986). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
30. Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., and Hay, K. (1994). Learner-centered design. Interactions, 1(2), 36-48.