Can a Polite Intelligent Tutoring System Lead to Improved Learning Outside of the Lab?

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 158, Issue , 2007, Pages 433-440

  McLaren, Bruce M ^a   Lim, Sung Joo ^a   Yaron, David ^a   Koedinger, Ken ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; EDUCATION COMPUTING; STOICHIOMETRY;

CONTROLLED LABORATORIES; E - LEARNING; ERROR MESSAGES; INTELLIGENT TUTORING; INTELLIGENT TUTORS; LEARNING GAIN; PROBLEM STATEMENT; TUTORING SYSTEM; WEB BASED;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 85140091851     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2003). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
2. McLaren, B. M., Lim, S., Gagnon, F., Yaron, D., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006). Studying the Effects of Personalized Language and Worked Examples in the Context of a Web-Based Intelligent Tutor; In the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 318-328.
3. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
4. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J., & Shelby. (2005). The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Five Years of Evaluations. In the Proceedings of AIED-05. 678-685.
5. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Ed. Psych., 93, 579-588.
6. Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2005). Experimental Evaluation of Polite Interaction Tactics for Pedagogical Agents. In the Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 12-19. ACM Press: New York.
7. Mayer, R. E., Johnson, W. L., Shaw, E. & Sandhu, S. (2006). Constructing Computer-Based Tutors that are Socially Sensitive: Politeness in Educational Software. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 64, 36-42.
8. Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Collins, H. (in press). The Politeness Effect: Pedagogical Agents and Learning Outcomes. To be published in the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.
9. Mayer, R. (2005). Principles of Multimedia Learning Based on Social Cues: Personalization, Voice, and Image Principles. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, R. E. Mayer (Ed). Chapter 14, 201-212.
10. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge University Press, New York.
11. Person, N. K., Kreuz, R. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Pragmatics and Pedagogy: Conversational Rules and Politeness Strategies May Inhibit Effective Tutoring. Cognition and Instruction 13, 161-188.
12. Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N., McLaren, B. M., & Hockenberry, M. (2004) Opening the Door to Non-Programmers: Authoring Intelligent Tutor Behavior by Demonstration; Proceedings of ITS-2004, 162-174.