Embodied medicine: What human-computer confluence can offer to health care

Human Computer Confluence: Transforming Human Experience Through Symbiotic Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 55-79

  Riva, Giuseppe ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO AUXOLOGICO ITALIANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bodily self consciousness; Human Computer Confluence; Interreality; Positive Technology; Virtual Reality

Indexed keywords

EID: 85127947442     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu Rev Psychol, 63, 1-29.
2. Balakrishnan, B., & Shyam Sundar, S. (2011). Where Am I? How Can I Get There? Impact of Navigability and Narrative Transportation on Spatial Presence. Human - Computer Interaction, 26(3), 161-204.
3. Barsalou, L.W. (2002). Being there conceptually: Simulating categories in preparation for situated action. In N.L. Stein, P.J. Bauer & M. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Representation, memory and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler (pp. 1-15). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Barsalou, L.W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513-562.
5. Barsalou, L.W. (2013). Mirroring as Pattern Completion Inferences within Situated Conceptualizations. Cortex, 49(10), 2951-2953.
6. Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336-372.
7. Bermudez, J., Marcel, A.J., & Eilan, N. (1995). The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Blanke, O. (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review]. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 13(8), 556-571.
9. Botella, C., Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., Wiederhold, B. K., Alcaniz, M., & Banos, R. M. (2012). The present and future of positive technologies. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 15(2), 78-84.
10. Brewin, C. R. (2006). Understanding cognitive behaviour therapy: A retrieval competition account. Behav Res Ther, 44(6), 765-784.
11. Brewin, C. R. (2014). Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: Foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Bull, 140(1), 69-97.
12. Brewin, C. R., & Burgess, N. (2014). Contextualisation in the revised dual representation theory of PTSD: a response to Pearson and colleagues. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 45(1), 217-219.
13. Brewin, C. R., Dalgleish, T., & Joseph, S. (1996). A dual representation theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Rev, 103(4), 670-686.
14. Brewin, C. R., Gregory, J. D., Lipton, M., & Burgess, N. (2010). Intrusive images in psychological disorders: characteristics, neural mechanisms, and treatment implications. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review]. Psychological review, 117(1), 210-232.
15. Brugger, P., Lenggenhager, B., & Giummarra, M. J. (2013). Xenomelia: a social neuroscience view of altered bodily self-consciousness. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 204.
16. Bryant, D.J. (1997). Representing Space in Language and Perception. Mind & Language, 12(3/4), 239-264.
17. Byrne, P., Becker, S., & Burgess, N. (2007). Remembering the Past and Imagining the Future: A Neural Model of Spatial Memory and Imagery. Psychological Review, 114(2), 340-375.
18. Chittaro, L., & Vianello, A. (2014). Computer-supported mindfulness: Evaluation of a mobile thought distancing application on naive meditators. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(3), 337-348.
19. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20. Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655-666.
21. Craig, A. D. (2003). Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13(4), 500-505.
22. Craig, A. D. (2010). The sentient self. Brain Structure & Function, 214(5-6), 563-577.
23. Crossley, N. (2001). The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. London: SAGE.
24. Damasio, A. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: a systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25-62.
25. Damasio, A. (1994). Decartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
26. Damasio, A. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413-1420.
27. Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace and Co, Inc.
28. Durlik, C., Cardini, F., & Tsakiris, M. (2014). Being watched: The effect of social self-focus on interoceptive and exteroceptive somatosensory perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 42-50.
29. Ferscha, A. (Ed.). (2013). Human Computer Confluence - The Next Generation Humans and Computers Research Agenda. Linz: Johannes Kepler University.
30. Fotopoulou, A., Jenkinson, P. M., Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P., Rudd, A., & Kopelman, M. D. (2011). Mirror-view reverses somatoparaphrenia: Dissociation between first- and third-person perspectives on body ownership. Neuropsychologia, 49(14), 3946-3955.
31. Galati, G., Pelle, G., Berthoz, A., & Committeri, G. (2010). Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory. Exp Brain Res, 206(2), 109-120.
32. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford.
33. Garfinkel, S. N., & Critchley, H. D. (2013). Interoception, emotion and brain: new insights link internal physiology to social behaviour. Commentary on: "Anterior insular cortex mediates bodily sensibility and social anxiety" by Terasawa et al. (2012). Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(3), 231-234.
34. Giudice, N.A., Klatzky, R.L., Bennett, C.R., & Loomis, J.M. (2013). Combining Locations from Working Memory and Long-Term Memory into a Common Spatial Image. Spatial Cognition & Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 103-128.
35. Herkenhoff Carijó, F., de Almeida, M.C., & Kastrup, V. (in press). On haptic and motor incorporation of tools and other objects. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, doi: 10.1007/s11097-012-9269-8.
36. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849-937.
37. Jacobs, S., Bussel, B., Combeaud, M., & Roby-Brami, A. (2009). The use of a tool requires its incorporation into the movement: Evidence from stick-pointing in apraxia. Cortex, 45(4), 444-455.
38. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
39. Jeannerod, M., & Jacob, P. (2005). Visual cognition: a new look at the two-visual systems model. [Review]. Neuropsychologia, 43(2), 301-312.
40. Kelly, J. W., & Avraamides, M. N. (2011). Cross-sensory transfer of reference frames in spatial memory. Cognition, 118(3), 444-450.
41. Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12(6), 467-472.
42. Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2003). Action identity: Evidence from self-recognition, prediction, and coordination. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 620-632.
43. Korrelboom, K., de Jong, M., Huijbrechts, I., & Daansen, P. (2009). Competitive memory training (COMET) for treating low self-esteem in patients with eating disorders: A randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol, 77(5), 974-980.
44. Legrand, D. (2010). Subjective and physical dimensions of bodily self-consciousness, and their dis-integration in anorexia nervosa. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 726-737.
45. Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096-1099.
46. Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Avraamides, M.N., Lippa, Y., & Golledge, R.G. (2007). Functional equivalence of spatial images produced by perception and spatial language. In F. Mast & L. Jancke (Eds.), Spatial processing in navigation, imagery, and perception (pp. 29-48). New York: Springer.
47. Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., & Giudice, N.A. (2013). Representing 3D space in working memory: Spatial images from vision, hearing, touch, and language. In S. Lacey & R. Lawson (Eds.), Multisensory Imagery (pp. 131-155). New York: Springer.
48. Loomis, J.M., Lippa, Y., Golledge, R.G., & Klatzky, R.L. (2002). Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-d sound and spatial language. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 28(2), 335-345.
49. Melzack, R. (1999). From the gate to the neuromatrix. Pain, S121-S126.
50. Melzack, R. (2005). Evolution of the Neuromatrix Theory of Pain. The Prithvi Raj Lecture: Presented at the Third World Congress of World Institute of Pain, Barcelona 2004. Pain Practice, 5(2), 85-94.
51. Melzack, R., & Katz, J. (2013). Pain. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science, 4(1), 1-15.
52. Miller, J. F., Neufang, M., Solway, A., Brandt, A., Trippel, M., Mader, I., et al. (2013). Neural activity in human hippocampal formation reveals the spatial context of retrieved memories. Science, 342(6162), 1111-1114.
53. Moseley, G. L., & Brugger, P. (2009). Interdependence of movement and anatomy persists when amputees learn a physiologically impossible movement of their phantom limb. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106(44), 18798-18802.
54. Pagnini, F., Di Credico, C., Gatto, R., Fabiani, V., Rossi, G., Lunetta, C., et al. (2014). Meditation training for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their caregivers. J Altern Complement Med, 20(4), 272-275.
55. Pagnini, F., Phillips, D., & Langer, E. (2014). A mindful approach with end-of-life thoughts. Front Psychol, 5, 138.
56. Perez-Marcos, D., Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2009). Inducing a virtual hand ownership illusion through a brain-computer interface. Neuroreport, 20(6), 589-594.
57. Pfeiffer, C., Lopez, C., Schmutz, V., Duenas, J. A., Martuzzi, R., & Blanke, O. (2013). Multisensory origin of the subjective first-person perspective: visual, tactile, and vestibular mechanisms. PLoS One, 8(4), e61751.
58. Prinz, J. (2006). Putting the brakes on Enactive Perception. PSYCHE, 12(1), 1-12; online: http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au.
59. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129-154.
60. Repetto, C., Gorini, A., Vigna, C., Algeri, D., Pallavicini, F., & Riva, G. (2009). The use of biofeedback in clinical virtual reality: the INTREPID project. J Vis Exp(33).
61. Repetto, C., & Riva, G. (2011). From virtual reality to interreality in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Neuropsychiatry, 1(1), 31-43.
62. Riva, G. (2009). Is presence a technology issue? Some insights from cognitive sciences Virtual Reality, 13(3), 59-69.
63. Riva, G. (2012). Personal experience in positive psychology may offer a new focus for a growing discipline. American Psychologist, 67(7), 574-575.
64. Riva, G. (2014). Out of my real body: cognitive neuroscience meets eating disorders. Front Hum Neurosci, 8, 236.
65. Riva, G., Banos, R. M., Botella, C., Wiederhold, B. K., & Gaggioli, A. (2012). Positive technology: using interactive technologies to promote positive functioning. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 15(2), 69-77.
66. Riva, G., Gaudio, S., & Dakanalis, A. (2013). I'm in a virtual body: a locked allocentric memory may impair the experience of the body in both obesity and anorexia nervosa. Eating and weight disorders: EWD.
67. Riva, G., & Mantovani, F. (2012). From the body to the tools and back: a general framework for presence in mediated interactions. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 203-210.
68. Riva, G., & Mantovani, F. (2014). Extending the Self through the Tools and the Others: a General Framework for Presence and Social Presence in Mediated Interactions. In G. Riva, J. A. Waterworth & D. Murray (Eds.), Interacting with Presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments (pp. 12-34). Berlin: De Gruyter Open - Online: http://www.presence-research.com.
69. Riva, G., & Waterworth, J. A. (2014). Being present in a virtual world. In M. Grimshaw (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Virtuality (pp. 205-221). New York: Oxford University Press.
70. Riva, G., Waterworth, J. A., & Murray, D. (2014). Interacting with Presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments. Berlin: De Gruyter Open - Online: http://www.presence-research.com.
71. Riva, G., Waterworth, J.A., Waterworth, E.L., & Mantovani, F. (2011). From intention to action: The role of presence. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(1), 24-37.
72. Salt, W. (2002). Irritable Bowel Syndrome and The Mind Body Connection. Columbus, OH: Parkview Publishing.
73. Seidler, R. D., Bo, J., & Anguera, J. A. (2012). Neurocognitive contributions to motor skill learning: the role of working memory. J Mot Behav, 44(6), 445-453.
74. Serino, S., & Riva, G. (2013). Getting lost in Alzheimer's disease: a break in the mental frame syncing. Medical Hypotheses, 80(4), 416-421.
75. Serino, S., & Riva, G. (2014). What is the role of spatial processing in the decline of episodic memory in Alzheimer's disease? The "mental frame syncing" hypothesis. [Perspective]. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6(33), 1-7.
76. Shilling, C. (2012). The Body & Social Theory. London: SAGE.
77. Simmons, K.W., & Barsalou, L.W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451-486.
78. Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H. H., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2009). Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Front Neurosci, 3(2), 214-220.
79. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Blanke, O. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS One, 5(5), e10564.
80. Slaughter, V., & Brownell, C. (Eds.). (2012). Early development of body representations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81. Tsakiris, M., Hesse, M. D., Boy, C., Haggard, P., & Fink, G. R. (2007). Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cereb Cortex, 17(10), 2235-2244.
82. Tsakiris, M., Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2010). Having a body versus moving your body: neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Neuropsy-chologia, 48(9), 2740-2749.
83. Vogeley, K., & Fink, G. R. (2003). Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends Cogn Sci, 7(1), 38-42.
84. Waterworth, J.A., & Waterworth, E.L. (2014). Altered, expanded and distributed embodiment: the three stages of interactive presence. In G. Riva, J. A. Waterworth & D. Murray (Eds.), Interacting with Presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments (pp. 36-50). Berlin: De Gruyter Open-Online: http://www.presence-research.com.
85. Waterworth, J.A., Waterworth, E.L., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G. (2010). On Feeling (the) Present: An evolutionary account of the sense of presence in physical and electronically-mediated environments. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(1-2), 167-178.
86. Waterworth, J.A., Waterworth, E.L., Mantovani, F., & Riva, G. (2012). Special Issue: Presence and Interaction. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 190-192.
87. Wen, W., Ishikawa, T., & Sato, T. (2013). Individual Differences in the Encoding Processes of Egocentric and Allocentric Survey Knowledge. Cognitive Science, 37(1), 176-192.
88. Wiederhold, B.K., & Riva, G. (2012). Positive technology supports shift to preventive, integrative health. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 15(2), 67-68.
89. Wilson, M. (2006). Covert Imitation. In G. Knoblich, I.M. Thornton, M. Grosjean & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 211-228). New York: Oxford University Press.
90. Wolbers, T., Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Wutte, M.G., & Giudice, N.A. (2011). Modality-independent coding of spatial layout in the human brain. Curr Biol, 21(11), 984-989.
91. Zheng, H., Luo, J., & Yu, R. (2014). From memory to prospection: The overlapping and the distinct components between remembering and imagining. Frontiers in psychology, 5(856).