Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 35, Issue , 2013, Pages 3-41

  Long, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126880049     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.35.01lon     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481-509.
2. Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249-306.
3. Baayen, R.H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP.
4. Bialystok, E. (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116-137.
5. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 161-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bialystok, E., & Miller, B. (1999). The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(2), 127-145.
7. Birdsong, D. (2005). Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In J. Kroll, & A.M.B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 109-127). Oxford: OUP.
8. Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 9-49.
9. Birdsong, D. (2009). Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie, & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition. Bingley: Emerald.
10. Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in secondlanguage acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235-249.
11. Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 175-198.
12. Blum-Kalka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., & van der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition. The case of very advanced learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica, 54, 298-308.
15. Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 447-465.
16. Bornstein, M. (1989). Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 179-197.
17. Chiswick, B.R., & Miller, P.W. (2008). A test of the critical period hypothesis for language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29(1), 16-29.
18. Chomsky, N. (2007). Of minds and language. Biolinguistics, 1, 9-27.
19. Cochran, B.P., McDonald, J.L., & Parault, S.J. (1999). Too smart for their own good: The disadvantage of a superior processing capacity for adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 30-58.
20. Coopmans, P. (2006). L2 acquisition, age, and generativist reasoning. Commentary on Birdsong. Language Learning, 56(Supplement 1), 51-58.
21. Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544-573.
22. Cummins, J. (1981). Age on arrival and immigrant second language learning in Canada: A reassessment. Applied Linguistics, 2, 132-149.
23. de Bot, K. (2008). The imaging of what in the multilingual mind? Second Language Research, 24(1), 111-133.
24. de Bot, K. (2009). Multilingualism and aging. In W.C. Ritchie, & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 425-442). Bingley: Emerald.
25. Dekydspotter, L., Sprouse, R.A., & Thyre, R. (2000). The interpretation of quantification at a distance in English-French interlanguage: Domain specificity and second-language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 8, 265-320.
26. DeKeyser, R.M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.
27. DeKeyser, R. (2006). A critique of recent arguments against the critical period hypothesis. In C. Abello-Contesse, R. Chacón-Beltrán, M.D. López-Jiménez, & M.M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp. 49-58). Bern: Peter Lang.
28. DeKeyser, R.M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In J. Williams, & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. DeKeyser, R. (2011). Differential age effects within and across linguistic domains. Paper presented at the International Society for Bilingualism conference, Oslo, June 18.
30. DeKeyser, R.M. (2012). Age effects in second language learning. In S.M. Gass, & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 442-460). New York, NY: Routledge.
31. DeKeyser, R.M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age-effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413-438.
32. DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the Critical Period really mean? In J.F. Kroll, & A.M.B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 88-108). Oxford: OUP.
33. Dabrowska, E. (1997). Cognitive semantics and the Polish dative. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. Donaldson, B. (2011). Left-dislocation in near-native French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 399-432.
35. Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Explanation in theories of second language. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 19(4), 677-714.
36. Fidler, A. (2006). Reconceptualizing fossilization in second language acquisition: A review. Second Language Research, 22(3), 398-411.
37. Flege, J.E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101-131). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Flege, J.E., Frieda, A., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169-186.
39. Flege, J.E., Munro, M., & Mackay, I. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125-3134.
40. Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, H. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 78-104.
41. Flynn, S., & Manuel, S. (1991). Age dependent effects in language acquisition: An evaluation of 'Critical Period' hypotheses. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point/counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 118-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Flynn, S., & Martyohardjono, G. (1995). Is there an age factor for Universal Grammar? In D. Singleton, & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition: A critical look at the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 135-153). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
43. Granena, G., & Long, M.H. (2010). Age of onset, length of residence, aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment in two linguistic domains. Paper presented at the 30th SLRF, College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
44. Granena, G., & Long, M.H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(1).
45. Hahn, W.K. (1987). Cerebral lateralization of function: From infancy through childhood. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 376-392.
46. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E.W. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the Critical Period Hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14(1), 31-38.
47. Han, Z.-H. (2004). Fossilization in adult second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
48. Han, Z.-H., & Odlin, T. (2005). Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
49. Herschensohn, J. (2007). Language development and age. Cambridge: CUP.
50. Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22, 369-397.
51. Hoyer, W.J., & Lincourt, A.E. (1998). Ageing and the development of learning. In M.A. Stadler, & P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 445-470). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Hyltenstam, K. (1988). Lexical characteristics of near-native L2 learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9, 67-84.
53. Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of non-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In R.J. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351-368). New York, NY: Elsevier.
54. Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539-588). Oxford: Blackwell.
55. Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the Critical Period Hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(1), 73-98.
56. Iverson, M. (2010). Informing the age-of-acquisition debate: L3 as a litmus test. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 48, 221-243.
57. Jia, G. (1998). Beyond brain maturation: The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition revisited. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York University.
58. Jia, G., & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1280-1299.
59. Johnson, J. (1992). Critical period effects in second language acquisition: The effect of written versus auditory materials on the assessment of grammatical competence. Language Learning, 42(2), 217-248.
60. Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-99.
61. Krashen, S.D. (1973). Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period: Some new evidence. Language Learning, 23(1), 63-74.
62. Krashen, S.D., Long, M.H., & Scarcella, R.C. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 573-582.
63. Reprinted in S.D. Krashen, R.C. Scarcella, & M.H. Long (Eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 161-172). Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1982.
64. Laudan, L. (1996). A problem-solving approach to scientific progress. In L. Laudan (Ed.), Beyond positivism and relativism. Theory, method, and evidence (pp. 77-87). Boulder, CO: Westview.
65. Lee, J. (1998). Is there a sensitive period for second language collocational knowledge? Unpublished master's thesis. University of Hawai'i, Honolulu.
66. Lenneberg, E.H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York, NY: Wiley.
67. Long, M.H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251-285.
68. Long, M.H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487-535). Oxford: Blackwell.
69. Long, M.H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 287-317.
70. Long, M.H. (2007). Age differences and the sensitive periods controversy in SLA. In M.H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 43-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Long, M.H. (2010). Towards a cognitive-interactionist theory of instructed adult SLA. Plenary address to the 30th Second Language Research Forum, October 14-17. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
72. Marinova-Todd, S. (2003). Comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.
73. Mayberry, R. (1993). First-language acquisition after childhood differs from second-language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1258-1270.
74. McDonald, J.L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 381-401.
75. Meisel, J.M. (2009). Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 28, 5-34.
76. Meisel, J.M. (2011). First and second language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
77. Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(3), 351-398.
78. Mulder, K., & Hulstijn, J.H. (2011). Linguistic skills of adult native speakers as a function of age and level of education. Applied Linguistics, 32, 475-494.
79. Munnich, E., & Landau, B. (2010). Developmental decline in the acquisition of spatial language. Language Learning and Development 6(1), 32-59.
80. Muñoz, C. (2008a). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 578-596.
81. Muñoz, C. (2008b). Age-related differences in foreign language learning. Revisiting the empirical evidence. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(3), 197-220.
82. Muñoz, C. (2011). Input in foreign language learning: More significant than starting age? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(2), 113-133.
83. Muñoz, C., & Singleton, D. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44, 1-35.
84. Munro, M., & Mann, V. (2005). Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26(3), 311-341.
85. Newport, E. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11-28.
86. Newport, E.L. (2002). Critical periods in language development. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 737-739). London: Macmillan/Nature Publishing Group.
87. O'Grady, W. (1996). Language acquisition without Universal Grammar: A general nativist proposal for L2 learning. Second Language Research, 12(4), 374-397.
88. Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(3), 261-283.
89. Oyama, S. (1978). The sensitive period and comprehension of speech. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 16, 1-17.
90. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
91. Patkowski, M.S. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449-472.
92. Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain-mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
93. Piske, T., MacKay, I., & Flege, J.E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191-215.
94. Plann, S. (1977). Acquiring a second language in an immersion situation. In H.D. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '77 (pp. 213-223). Washington, DC: TESOL.
95. Purcell, E.T., & Suter, R.W. (1980). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning, 30(2), 271-287.
96. Rebuschat, P.E., & Williams, J. (2009). Implicit learning of word order. In N.A. Taatgen, & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 425-430). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
97. Ross, S. (1998). Self assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1-20.
98. Rothman, J. (2008). Why not all counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis is equal or problematic: Implications for SLA. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 1063-1088.
99. Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2007). Input type and parameter resetting: Is naturalistic input necessary? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(4), 285-319.
100. Scarcella, R.C., & Higa, C.A. (1982). Input and age differences in second language acquisition. In S.D. Krashen, R. Scarcella, & M.H. Long (Eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 175-201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
101. Schachter, J. (1996). Maturation and universal grammar. In W.C. Ritchie, & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 159-193). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
102. Schwartz, B.D. (1986). The epistemological status of second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 2, 120-159.
103. Seliger, H.W. (1978). Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In W.C. Ritchie (Ed.), Second language acquisition research. Issues and implications (pp. 11-19). New York, NY: Academic Press.
104. Sherwood, C.C., Gordon, A.D., Allen, J.S., Phillips, K.A., Erwin, J.M., Hof, P.R., & Hopkins, W.D. (2011). Aging of the cerebral cortex differs between humans and chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 13029-13034.
105. Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A.G. (2004). The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 381-398.
106. Singleton, D. (2005). The Critical Period Hypothesis: A coat of many colours. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(4), 269-285.
107. Slabakova, R. (2006). Is there a critical period for semantics? Second Language Research, 22(3), 302-338.
108. Slabakova, R., & Montrul, S. (2003). Genericity and aspecxt in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition, 11, 165-196.
109. Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. (1977). Age differences and the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language and Speech, 20, 357-365.
110. Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114-1128.
111. Reprinted in S.D. Krashen, R. Scarcella, & M.H. Long (Eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 93-111). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
112. Song, H.S., & Schwartz, B.D. (2009). Testing the fundamental difference hypothesis: L2 adult, L2 child, and L1 child comparisons in the acquisition of Korean wh-constructions with Negative Polarity Items. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 323-361.
113. Sorace, A. (1993). Near-nativeness. In C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130-151). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
114. Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339-368.
115. Spadaro, K. (1996). Maturational constraints on lexical acquisition in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Western Australia.
116. Spadaro, K. (this volume). Maturational constraints on lexical acquisition in a second language.
117. Stevens, G. (1999). Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults. Language in Society, 28, 555-578.
118. Stevens, G. (2004). Using census data to test the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 15, 215-216.
119. Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981). Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language. Language and Speech, 24(3), 265-272.
120. Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41(2), 177-204.
121. Ullman, M.T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141-178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
122. van Boxtel, S. (2005). Can the late bird catch the worm? Ultimate attainment in L2 syntax. Utrecht: LOT.
123. van Boxtel, S., Bongaerts, T., & Coppen, P.-A. (2005). Native-like attainment of dummy subjects in Dutch and the role of the L1. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 355-380.
124. White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12(3), 233-265.
125. Wiley, E.W., Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (2005). New approaches to using census data to test the Critical-Period Hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 16(4), 341-343.
126. Williams, J.N. (2009). Implicit learning. In W.C. Ritchie, & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319-353). Bingley: Emerald.
127. Yeni-Komshian, G., Flege, J.E., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(2), 131-149.