Facilitating students' inquiry learning and metacognitive development through modifiable software advisers

Computers As Cognitive Tools: Volume II, No More Walls

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 97-132

  White, Barbara Y ^a   Shimoda, Todd A ^a   Frederiksen, John R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Educational Testing Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118339676     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Astington, J., Harris, P., & Olson, D. (Eds.). (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Baird, J., Fensham, P., Gunstone, R., & White, R. (1991). The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 163-182.
3. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 269-292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Brewer, W. F., & Samarapungavan, A. (1991). Children's theories vs. scientific theories: Differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge? In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 60-108). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schäuble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1995). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 39-55). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9. Chi, M., Bassock, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
10. Collins, A., & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1-18). New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28, 25-42.
12. Damon, W. (1990). Social relations and children's thinking skills. In D. Kuhn (Ed.), Developmental perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills (pp. 95-107). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
13. de Jong, H., & Rip, A. (1997). The computer revolution in science: Steps towards the realization of computer-supported discovery environments. Artificial Intelligence, 91 (2), 225-256.
14. Derry, S. J. (1992). Metacognitive models of learning and instructional systems design. In M. Jones & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Adaptive learning environments (pp. 257-286). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
15. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: Heath.
16. Dewey, J. (1938). The pattern of inquiry. In Logic: The theory of inquiry (pp. 101-119). New York: Henry Holt.
17. Dillenbourg, P. (1992). The computer as a constructorium: Tools for observing one's own learning. In R. Moyse & M. Elsom-Cook (Eds.), Knowledge negotiation (pp. 185-198). London: Academic Press.
18. Driver, R., Asika, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 5-12.
19. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Feldman, C. (1992). The new theory of mind. Human Development, 35, 107-117.
21. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
22. Franklin, S., & Graesser, A. (1997). Is it an agent, or just a program? A taxonomy for autonomous agents. In J. P. Müller, M. J. Wooldridge, & N. R. Jennings (Eds.), Intelligent agents III: Agent theories, architectures, and languages (pp. 141-155). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
23. Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. Y. (1997). Cognitive facilitation: A method for promoting reflective collaboration. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
24. Gopnik, A. (1996). The post-Piaget era. Psychological Science, 7(4), 221-225.
25. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 1-32.
26. Kafai, Y B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Inhelder, B. (1974-1975). If you want to get ahead, get a theory. Cognition, 3, 195-212.
28. Kearsley, G. (1993). Intelligent agents and instructional systems: Implications of a new paradigm. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4(4), 295-304.
29. Lajoie, S. (1993). Computer environments as cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 261-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Minsky, M. (1985). The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31. Nersessian, N. (1991). Conceptual change in science and in science education. In M. Matthews (Ed.), History, philosophy and science teaching: Selected readings. Toronto: OISE Press, Teachers College Press.
32. Okada, T., & Simon, H. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 21, 109-146.
33. Palincsar, A. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.
34. Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. Advances in Research on Teaching, 1, 35-71.
35. Piaget, J. (1976). The grasp of consciousness: Action and concept in the young child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (1995). Intelligent agents. In Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (pp. 31-52). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1-24.
38. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37-68.
39. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
40. Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (1990). Scientific thinking in children and adults. In D. Kuhn (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on teaching and learning thinking skills (pp. 9-27). Basel: Karger.
41. Schauble, L., Raghavan, K., & Glaser, R. (1993). The discovery and reflection notation: A graphical trace for supporting self-regulation in computer-based laboratories. In S. R Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 319-337). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Self, J. (1992). Computational viewpoints. In R. Moyse & M. Elsom-Cook (Eds.), Knowledge negotiation (pp. 21-40). London: Academic Press.
44. Shimoda, T., White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1999). Acquiring and transferring intellectual skills with modifiable software agents in a virtual inquiry support environment. In Proceedings of the 12nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
45. Slavin, R. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
46. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
47. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. White, B. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1-100.
50. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 76(1), 3-117.
51. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1990). Causal model progressions as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. Artificial Intelligence, 24, 99-157.
52. White, B., Shimoda, T., & Frederiksen, J. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(2), 151-182.