The errors of experts: When expertise hinders effective provision and seeking of advice and feedback

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue , 2022, Pages 91-95

  Zhang, Ting ^a   Harrington, Kelly B ^a   Sherf, Elad N ^b  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Advice; Cognitive entrenchment; Expertise; Feedback; Perspective taking; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

FEEDBACK; HUMANS; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 85111179318     PISSN: 2352250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.011     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Dane, E., Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: a cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad Manag Rev 4 (2010), 579–603.
2. Ericsson, K.A., Smith, J., (eds.) Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits, 1991, Cambridge University Press.
3. Larrick, R.P., Feiler, D.C., Expertise in decision making. Keren, G., Wu, G., (eds.) The wiley blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, 2015, John Wiley & Sons, 696–721.
4. Blunden, H., Logg, J.M., Brooks, A.W., John, L.K., Gino, F., Seeker beware: the interpersonal costs of ignoring advice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 150 (2019), 83–100 An empirical article showing that advice givers, particularly expert ones, penalize seekers who do not adopt their advice, and that advice givers aim to narrow the set of possible options to choose from, whereas seekers aim to broaden the set of possibilities.
5. Bonaccio, S., Dalal, R.S., Advice taking and decision-making: an integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2 (2006), 127–151.
6. Hofmann, D.A., Lei, Z., Grant, A.M., Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: the sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. J Appl Psychol, 5, 2009, 1261.
7. Lim, J.H., Tai, K., Bamberger, P.A., Morrison, E.W., Soliciting resources from others: an integrative review. Acad Manag Ann 1 (2020), 122–159 An integrative review of research on the four resource-seeking behaviors: feedback seeking, information seeking, advice seeking, and help seeking.
8. Dror, I.E., The paradox of human expertise: why experts get it wrong. Kapur, N., (eds.) The paradoxical brain, 2011, Cambridge University Press, 177–188.
9. Mannucci, P.V., Yong, K., The differential impact of knowledge depth and knowledge breadth on creativity over individual careers. Acad Manag J 5 (2018), 1741–1763.
10. Hinds, P.J., Patterson, M., Pfeffer, J., Bothered by abstraction: the effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. J Appl Psychol, 6, 2001, 1232.
11. Schaerer, M., Kern, M., Berger, G., Medvec, V., Swaab, R.I., The illusion of transparency in performance appraisals: when and why accuracy motivation explains unintentional feedback inflation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 144 (2018), 171–186 An empirical article showing that managers overestimate how accurately employees perceive their feedback, particularly negative feedback.
12. Ku, G., Wang, C.S., Galinsky, A.D., The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Res Organ Behav 35 (2015), 79–102.
13. Ruttan, R.L., McDonnell, M.H., Nordgren, L.F., Having “been there” doesn't mean I care: when prior experience reduces compassion for emotional distress. J Pers Soc Psychol, 4, 2015, 610.
14. Sherf, E.N., Morrison, E.W., I do not need feedback! Or do I? Self-efficacy, perspective taking, and feedback seeking. J Appl Psychol, 2, 2020, 146 An empirical paper showing that self-efficacy and feedback seeking are negatively associated and that perspective taking (measured and induced) mitigates this negative effect.
15. Fisher, M., Keil, F.C., The curse of expertise: when more knowledge leads to miscalibrated explanatory insight. Cogn Sci 5 (2016), 1251–1269.
16. Hinds, P.J., The curse of expertise: the effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. J Exp Psychol Appl, 2, 1999, 205.
17. Schaerer, M., Tost, L.P., Huang, L., Gino, F., Larrick, R., Advice giving: a subtle pathway to power. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 5 (2018), 746–761 An empirical article showing that providing advice makes individuals feel more powerful because it gives the adviser a perceived sense of influence over others.
18. Tost, L.P., Gino, F., Larrick, R.P., Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: why the powerful don't listen. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1 (2012), 53–65.
19. Larson, J.S., Billeter, D.M., Adaptation and fallibility in experts' judgments of novice performers. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2, 2017, 271.
20. Hur, J.D., Ruttan, R.L., Shea, C.T., The unexpected power of positivity: predictions versus decisions about advisor selection. J Exp Psychol Gen, 10, 2020, 1969 An empirical article showing that although individuals expect to go to experts for input, they are actually more inclined to turn to individuals who express greater positivity.
21. Reyt, J.N., Wiesenfeld, B.M., Trope, Y., Big picture is better: the social implications of construal level for advice taking. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 135 (2016), 22–31.
22. Zhang, T., Back to the beginning: how rediscovering inexperience helps experts advise novices. Acad Manag Proc, 1, 2015, 15215 Academy of Management, Manor, NY.
23. Finkelstein, S.R., Fishbach, A., Tell me what I did wrong: experts seek and respond to negative feedback. J Consum Res 1 (2012), 22–38.
24. Sherf EN, Croitoru N, McElroy T: Conceptualizing seeking behaviors at work as goal-striving activities: a meta-analysis. [Unpublished results].
25. Cojuharenco, I., Karelaia, N., When leaders ask questions: can humility premiums buffer the effects of competence penalties?. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 156 (2020), 113–134 An empirical article showing that leaders receive a “humility premium” from asking questions that increases trust and buffers against any competence penalties.
26. Yaniv, I., Receiving other people's advice: influence and benefit. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1 (2004), 1–13.
27. Moreau, C.P., Lehmann, D.R., Markman, A.B., Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products. J Mark Res 1 (2001), 14–29.
28. Mueller, J., Melwani, S., Loewenstein, J., Deal, J.J., Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Acad Manag J 1 (2018), 94–110.
29. Perry-Smith, J.E., Mannucci, P.V., From creativity to innovation: the social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad Manag Rev 1 (2017), 53–79.
30. See, K.E., Morrison, E.W., Rothman, N.B., Soll, J.B., The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 2 (2011), 272–285.
31. Sherf, E.N., Gajendran, R.S., Posner, B.Z., Seeking and finding justice: why and when managers' feedback seeking enhances justice enactment. J Organ Behav, 2020, 10.1002/job.2481.
32. Morrison, E.W., Milliken, F.J., Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad Manag Rev 4 (2000), 706–725.
33. Ashford, S.J., Self-assessments in organizations: a literature-review and integrative model. Res Organ Behav 11 (1989), 133–174.
34. Mabe, P.A., West, S.G., Validity of self-evaluation of ability: a review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 3 (1982), 280–296.
35. Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., Taylor, M.S., Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J Appl Psychol 4 (1979), 349–371.
36. Tourish, D., Robson, P., Sensemaking and the distortion of critical upward communication in organizations. J Manag Stud 4 (2006), 711–730.
37. Isaakyan, S., Sherf, E.N., Tangirala, S., Guenter, H., Keeping it between us: managerial endorsement of public versus private voice. J Appl Psychol, 2020, 10.1037/apl0000816.
38. Kang, S.H., Kim, J., The fragility of experts: a moderated-mediation model of expertise, expert identity threat, and overprecision. Acad Manag J, 2021, 10.5465/amj.2019.0899 An empirical paper showing that negative feedback about mistakes can result in experts doubling down with overprecise predictions and assessments.
39. Green P, Blunden H, Gino F: The social facilitation of effective feedback: feedback giver mindset and the developmental nature of feedback messages. [Unpublished results].
40. Heslin, P.A., VandeWalle, D., Performance appraisal procedural justice: the role of a manager's implicit person theory. J Manag 6 (2011), 1694–1718.
41. Brooks, A.W., Gino, F., Schweitzer, M.E., Smart people ask for (my) advice: seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Manag Sci 6 (2015), 1421–1435.
42. Huang, K., Yeomans, M., Brooks, A.W., Minson, J., Gino, F., It doesn't hurt to ask: question-asking increases liking. J Pers Soc Psychol 3 (2017), 430–452.
43. Dannals, J.E., Reit, E.S., Miller, D.T., From whom do we learn group norms? Low-ranking group members are perceived as the best sources. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 161 (2020), 213–227 An empirical article showing that individuals prefer to receive advice about social norms from low-ranking rather than high-ranking group members.
44. Neeley, T.B., Reiche, B.S., How global leaders gain power through downward deference and reduction of social distance. Acad Manag J, 2020, 10.5465/amj.2019.0531 An empirical article showing that global leaders are more effective when they engage in downward deference, or acknowledging and relying on the expertise of those below them in the organizational hierarchy.
45. Mannucci, P.V., Perry-Smith, J.E., “Who are you going to call?” Network activation in creative idea generation and elaboration. Acad Manag J, 2021, 10.5465/amj.2019.0333 An empirical paper showing that professionals with large networks often do not use them effectively in different stages of the creative ideation and elaboration process.
46. Zhang T, Wang D, Galinsky AD: Learning down to train up: mentors are more effective when they gather insights from below. [Unpublished results].
47. Zhou, H., Majka, E.A., Epley, N., Inferring perspective versus getting perspective: underestimating the value of being in another person's shoes. Psychol Sci 4 (2017), 482–493.
48. Blunden H, Yoon J, Whillans AV: Soliciting advice rather than feedback yields more developmental, critical, and actionable input. [Unpublished results].
49. Zhang, T., Kim, T., Brooks, A.W., Gino, F., Norton, M.I., A “present” for the future: the unexpected value of rediscovery. Psychol Sci 10 (2014), 1851–1860.
50. Zhang, T., North, M.S., What goes down when advice goes up: younger advisers underestimate their impact. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 10 (2020), 1444–1460 An empirical paper showing that individuals underestimate the impact of their advice when they feel “too young” to give it.
51. Levari DE, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT: Tips from the top: do the best performers really give the best advice? [Unpublished results].