Spoken corpus for an ordinary learner

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 12, Issue , 2004, Pages 89-105

  Mauranen, Anna ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85105681726     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.12.09mau     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aston, G. (1995). Corpora in language pedagogy: Matching theory and practice. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Theory and Practice in Applied Linguistics (pp. 257-270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Aston, G. (2001). Learning with corpora: An overview. In G. Aston (Ed.), Learning with Corpora (pp. 7-45). Bologna: CLUEB.
3. Aston, G. & Burnard, L. (1998). The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Bernardini, S. (2000). Competence, Capacity, Corpora. Bologna: CLUEB.
5. Biber, D., R. Reppen, V. Clark, & J. Walter (2001). Representing spoken language in university settings: The design and construction of the spoken component of the T2KSWAL Corpus. In R. C. Simpson & J. M. Swales (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics in North America (pp. 48-57). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
6. Brazil, D. (1995). A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Burdine, S. (2001). The lexical phrase as pedagogical tool: Teaching disagreement strategies in ESL. In R. C. Simpson & J. M. Swales (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics in North America (pp. 195-210). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
8. Bybee, J. & P. Hopper (2001). Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure (pp. 1-24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA. Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. SSLA, 18, 91-126.
10. Erman, B. & B. Warren (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 87-120.
11. Jääskeläinen, R. & A. Mauranen (2000). Development of a corpus for the timber industry. Project SPIRIT. Unpublished research report, Savonlinna School of Translation Studies, University of Joensuu.
12. Jääskeläinen, R. & A. Mauranen (2001). Kääntäjät ja kieliteknologia - kokemuksia työelämästä (= Translators and language technology - experience from work). In M. Charles & P. Hiidenmaa (Eds.), Tietotyön yhteiskunta - kielten valtakunta [AfinLA Yearbook 2001] (pp. 358-370). Jyväskylä: AFinla.
13. Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. In T. Johns & P. King (Eds.), Classroom Concordancing [ELR Journal 4] (pp. 1-16).
15. Knapp, K. & C. Meierkord (Eds.). (2002). Lingua Franca Communication. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
16. Lawson, A. (2001). Rethinking French grammar for pedagogy: The contribution of spoken corpora. In R. C. Simpson & J. M. Swales (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics in North America (pp. 179-194). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17. Lightbown, P. (2000). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 431-462.
18. Lindemann, S. & A. Mauranen (2001). “It's just real messy”: The occurrence and function of just in a corpus of academic speech. English for Specific Purposes, 2001(1), 459-476.
19. Mauranen, A. (2003). The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 513-527.
20. McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. McCarthy, M. (2001). Issues in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of Second-Language Learning. London: Arnold.
23. Mparutsa, C., A. Love, & A. Morrison (1991). Bringing concord to the ESP classroom. In T. Johns & P. King (Eds.), Classroom Concordancing [ELR Journal 4] (pp. 15-134).
24. Nattinger, J. R. & J. S. DeCarrico (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
26. Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 14, 357-385.
27. Seidlhofer, B. (2000). Mind the gap: English as a mother tongue vs. English as a lingua franca. Vienna English Working Papers, 9, 51-68.
28. Simpson, R. C, S. L. Briggs, J. Ovens, & J. M. Swales (1999). The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
29. Swales, J. (2001). Integrated and fragmented worlds: EAP materials and corpus linguistics. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 153-167). London: Longman.
30. Widdowson, H. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 3-25.
31. Wray, A. (1999). Formulaic language in learners and native speakers. Language Teaching, 32, 213-231.
32. Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463-489.
33. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wray, A. & M. R. Perkins (2000). The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. Language and Communication, 20(1), 1-28.
35. Zorzi, D. (2001). The pedagogic use of spoken corpora: Introducing corpus concordancing in the classroom. In G. Aston (Ed.), Learning with Corpora (pp. 85-107). Bologna: CLUEB.