Differential Effects of Capital-Enhancing and Recreational Internet Use on Citizens’ Demand for Democracy

Communication Research

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2020, Pages 1034-1055

  Stoycheff, Elizabeth ^a   Nisbet, Erik C ^b   Epstein, Dmitry ^c  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

authoritarian; democracy; Internet; Russia; social media; Ukraine

Indexed keywords

EID: 85089201589     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650216644645     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A., (2005). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
2. Almond G. A., Verba S., (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Appel M., (2008). Fictional narratives cultivate just-world beliefs. Journal of Communication, 58, 62-83.
4. Andsager J. L., Wyatt R. O., Martin E. L., (2004). Free expression and five democratic publics: Support for individual and media rights. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.
5. Asmolov G., (2015). Welcoming the dragon: The role of public opinion in Russian internet regulation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Center for Global Communication Studies White Paper. Retrieved from http://www.global.asc.upenn.edu/publications/welcoming-the-dragon-the-role-of-public-opinion-in-russian-internet-regulation/
6. Bailard C. S., (2012a). A field experiment on the Internet’s effect in an African election: Savvier citizens, disaffected voters, or both? Journal of Communication, 62, 330-344. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01632.x
7. Bailard C. S., (2012b). Testing the Internet’s effect on democratic satisfaction: A multi-methodological, cross-national approach. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 185-204. doi:10.1080/19331681.2011.641495
8. Bailard C. S., (2014). Democracy’s double-edged sword: How Internet use changes citizens views of their government. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Bakker T. P., de Vreese C. H., (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38, 451-470.
10. Besley J. C., (2006). The role of entertainment television and its interactions with individual values in explaining political participation. International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 41-63.
11. Best M. L., Wade K. W., (2009). The Internet and democracy: Global catalyst or democratic dud? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 255-271.
12. Bimber B., (1999). The internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter? Political Communication, 16(4), 409-428.
13. Bimber B., (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Boulianne S., (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26, 193-211.
15. Boulianne S., (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 524-538.
16. Bratton M., Mattes R. B., Gyimah-Boadi E., (2005). Public opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17. Bratton M., van de Walle N., (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18. Breuer A., Groshek J., (2014). Online media and offline empowerment in post-rebellion Tunisia: An analysis of Internet use during democratic transition. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11, 25-44. doi:10.1080/19331681.2013.850464
19. Brownlee J., (2007). Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20. Ceron A., (2015). Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 487-503.
21. Coyne C. J., Leeson P. T., (2009). Media as a mechanism of institutional change and reinforcement. Kyklos, 62, 1-14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00421.x
22. Dalton R. J., Shin D. C., Jou W., (2007). Understanding democracy: Data from unlikely places. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 142–156.
23. Delli Carpini M. X., (2012). Entertainment media and the political engagement of citizens. In Semetko H. A., Scammel M., (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 9-21). London, England: Sage.
24. de Zuniga H. G., Jung N., Valenzuela S., (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement, and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319-336.
25. Diamond L., (2008). Democratic rollback: Resurgence of the predatory state. Foreign Affairs, 86, 36-48.
26. DiMaggio P., Hargittai E., Celeste C., Shafer S., (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In Neckerman K. M., (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355-400). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
27. Farina C. R., Newhart M., Heidt J., (2012). Rulemaking vs. democracy: Judging and nudging public participation that counts. Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 2, 123-172.
28. Farrell H., (2012). The consequences of the Internet for politics. American Review of Political Science, 15, 35-52. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815
29. Freedom House. (2015a). Freedom of the net 2015. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/freedom-net-2015
30. Freedom House. (2015b). Freedom of the press 2015. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/freedom-press-2015
31. Freedom House. (2015c). Freedom in the world 2015. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/ukraine
32. Freyburg T., (2015). Transgovernmental networks as an apprenticeship in democracy? Socialization into democratic governance through cross-national activities. International Studies Quarterly, 59, 59-72.
33. Groshek J., (2009). The democratic effects of the Internet, 1994-2003: A cross-national inquiry of 152 countries. International Communication Gazette, 71, 115-136.
34. Groshek J., (2010). A times-series multinational analysis of democratic forecasts and Internet diffusion. International Journal of Communication, 4, 142-174.
35. Hadland A., (2011). Africanizing three models of media and politics: The South African experience. In Hallin D. C., Mancini P., (Eds.), Comparing media systems beyond the western world (pp. 96-118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36. Hallin D. C., Mancini P., (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hargittai E., Hinnant A., (2008). Digital inequality differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35, 602-621. doi:10.1177/0093650208321782
38. Harkness J. A., Braun M., Edwards B., Johnson T. P., Lyberg L. E., Mohler P. P... Smith T. W., (2010). Survey methods in multicultural, multinational, and multiregional contexts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
39. Hayes A. F., (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Howard P. N., Hussain M. M., (2011). The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35-48. doi:10.1353/jod.2011.0041
41. Howard P. N., Hussain M. M., (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab spring. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Inglehart R., (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Jiang M., (2010). Authoritarian deliberation on Chinese Internet. Electronic Journal of Communication, 20(3-4). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1439354
44. Kern H. L., Hainmueller J., (2009). Opium for the masses: How foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis, 17, 377-399.
45. Khazaeli S., Stockemer D., (2013). The Internet: A new route to good governance. International Political Science Review, 35, 463-482.
46. King G., Pan J., Roberts M., (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107, 326-343. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000014
47. Kremerman L., Cohen J., Tsfati Y., (2012). Examining the association between exposure to violent media and aggressive political opinions in the Israeli context. Communication Reports, 25, 88-99.
48. Lee K. M., (2006). Effects of Internet use on college students’ political efficacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 415-422. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.415
49. Lei Y., (2011). The political consequences of the rise of the Internet: Political beliefs and practices of Chinese Netizens. Political Communication, 28, 291-322. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.572449
50. Lenhart A., Purcell K., Smith A., Zickuhr K., (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Millennials. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 51.
51. Mattes R., Bratton M., (2007). Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 192-217.
52. McBride A., (1998). Television, individualism, and social capital. Political Science & Politics, 31(3), 542–552.
53. McChesney R. W., (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. New York, NY: The New Press.
54. McChesney R. W., (2015). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York, NY: The New Press.
55. Minier J. A., (2001). Is democracy a normal good? Evidence from democratic movements. Southern Economic Journal, 67, 996-1009.
56. Morgan M., Shanahan J., (1991). Television and the cultivation of political attitudes in Argentina. Journal of Communication, 41, 88-103.
57. Morozov E., (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
58. Moy P., Pfau M., Kahlor L., (1999). Media use and public confidence in democratic institutions. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(2), 137-158.
59. Neuman W. R., Bimber B., Hindman M., (2011). The Internet and four dimensions of citizenship. In Edwards G. E., III Jacobs L. R., Shapiro R. Y., (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and the media (pp. 22-42). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60. Nisbet E. C., (2008). Media use, democratic citizenship, and communication gaps in a developing democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(4), 454-482.
61. Nisbet E. C., (2015). Benchmarking public demand: Russia’s appetite for Internet control. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School of Communication. Retrieved from http://www.global.asc.upenn.edu/app/uploads/2015/02/Russia-Public-Opinion.pdf
62. Nisbet E. C., Mikati S., (2015, February 17). How Russia is building a psychological firewall against the West. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/how-russia-is-building-a-psychological-firewall-against-the-west-37366
63. Nisbet E. C., Stoycheff E., (2013). Let the people speak: A multilevel model of supply and demand for press freedom. Communication Research, 40(5), 720-741.
64. Nisbet E. C., Stoycheff E., Pearce K. E., (2012). Internet use and democratic demands: A multinational, multilevel model of Internet use and citizen attitudes about democracy. Journal of Communication, 62, 249-265. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01627.x
65. Norris P., (2003). Preaching to the converted? Pluralism, participation and party websites. Party Politics, 9, 21-45.
66. Norris P., (2008). Driving Democracy: Do power sharing institutions work? (pp. 186-206). New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Norris P., (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
68. Norris P., Inglehart R., (2009). Limits on press freedom and regime support. In Norris P., (Ed.), Public sentinel: News media & governance reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://pippanorris.com/
69. Peffley M., Rohrschneider R., (2003). Democratization and political tolerance in seventeen countries: A multi-level model of democratic learning. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 243-257.
70. Popova M., (2012). Politicized justice in emerging democracies: A study of courts in Russia and Ukraine. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
71. Prior M., (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577-592.
72. Qi L., Shin D. C., (2011). How mass political attitudes affect democratization: Exploring the facilitating role critical democrats play in the process. International Political Science Review, 32, 245-262.
73. Robinson L., Schulz J., (2013). Net time negotiations within the family. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 542-560.
74. Rose R., Mishler W., Munro N., (2011). Popular support for an undemocratic regime: The changing views of Russians. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
75. Russian Public Opinion Research Center. (2015, October 11). Ratings of state institutions. Retrieved from http://www.wciom.com/index.php?id=122
76. Scheufele D. A., Nisbet M. C., Ostmas R. E., (2005). September 11 news coverage, public opinion, and support for civil liberties. Mass Communication and Society, 8(3), 197-218.
77. Scheufele D. A., Nisbet M. C., (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(3), 55-75.
78. Shah D. V., (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19, 469-496.
79. Shah D. V., McLeod J. M., Yoon S.-H., (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 464-506.
80. Shanahan J., (1998). Television and authoritarianism: Exploring the concept of mainstreaming. Political Communication, 15, 483-495.
81. Stoycheff E., Nisbet E. C., (2014). What’s the bandwidth for democracy? Deconstructing Internet penetration and citizen attitudes about governance. Political Communication, 31, 628-646. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.852641
82. Tang L., Sampson H., (2012). The interaction between mass media and the Internet in non-democratic states: The case of China. Media, Culture & Society, 34, 457-471.
83. Tapsell R., (2013). The media freedom movement in Malaysia and the electoral authoritarian regime. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43, 613-635.
84. van Deursen A. J. A. M., van Dijk J. A. G. M., (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010-2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 782-797.
85. Vartanova E., (2015). Media pluralism in Russia: In need of policy making. In Valcke P., Sükösd M., Picard R. G., (Eds.), Media pluralism and diversity: Concepts, risks and global trends. (pp. 193-210). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
86. Wagner K. M., Gainous J., (2013). Digital uprising: The Internet revolution in the Middle East. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10, 261-275. doi:10.1080/19331681.2013.778802
87. Wang S., (2007). Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17, 381-395. doi:10.1080/01292980701636993
88. Wojcieszak M., Smith B., (2014). Will politics be tweeted? New media use and Iranian youth in 2011. New Media & Society, 16, 91-109.
89. Wolfsfeld G., Segev E., Sheafer T., (2013). Social media and the Arab spring: Politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18, 115-137.
90. World Internet Project. (2011). The World Internet Project international report (4th ed.). University of Southern California, Annenberg School, Center for the Digital Future. Retrieved from http://worldinternetproject.com/_files/_Published/_oldis/770_2012wip_report4th_ed.pdf
91. Zaller J., (1992). The nature and origin of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.