Online Media and Offline Empowerment in Post-Rebellion Tunisia: An Analysis of Internet Use During Democratic Transition

Journal of Information Technology and Politics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 25-44

  Breuer, Anita ^a   Groshek, Jacob ^b  

^a GERMAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (Germany)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arab Spring; democratic transition; Internet use; political empowerment; protest mobilization; Tunisia

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894480883     PISSN: 19331681     EISSN: 1933169X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2013.850464     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abramson, P. R. 1983. Political attitudes in America: Formation and change, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
2. Almond, G. and Verba, S. 1963. The civic culture. Political attitudes and democracy in five nations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Bandura, A. 1997. Self efficacy: The exercise of control, New York: Freeman.
4. Best, M. L. and Wade, K. W. 2009. The Internet and democracy: Global catalyst or democratic dud?. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 9 (4): 255 - 271.
5. Bimber, B., Stohl, C. and Flanagin, A. 2008. " Technological change and the shifting nature of political organization ". In handbook of Internet politics, Edited by: Chadwick, A. and Howard, P. N. 72 - 85. New York: Routledge. Routledge
6. Böhnke, O. 2012. Europe's digital foreign policy: Possible impacts of an EU online democracy promotion strategy, Strasbourg, France: European Council on Foreign Relations.
7. Boulianne, S. 2009. Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26 (2): 193 - 211.
8. Breuer, A. 2012. " Discussion Paper 10/2012 ". In The role of social media in mobilizing political protest: Evidence from the Tunisian revolution, Bonn, Germany: German Development Institute.
9. Breuer, A., Landman, T. and Farquhar, D. 2012, October. " Social media and protest mobilization ". In Evidence from the Tunisian revolution. Paper presented at the 4th European Communication Conference for the European Communication Research and Education Association (ECREA, Turkey: Istanbul.
10. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. and Stokes, D. E. 1960. The American voter, New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
11. Chan, J. M. and Lee, F. L. 2005. " A study of three large-scale demonstrations ". In Mobilization and protest participation in post-handover Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies. Occasional Paper No. 159
12. Chang, H.-C. and Chyi, H.I. 2009. Voting with their feet: The relationship between political efficacy and protest propensity among Hong Kong residents. The Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 5 (2): 127 - 144.
13. Chen, X. 2009. The power of SPiquotSPitroublemakingSPiquotSPi: Protest tactics and their efficacy in China. Comparative Politics, 41 (4): 451 - 471.
14. Chomiak, L. 2011. The making of a revolution in Tunisia. Middle East Law and Governance, 3: 68 - 83.
15. Chowdhury, M. 2008. " The role of the Internet in Burma's saffron revolution ". In Internet & democracy case study series, Vol. 2088-08, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Berkman Center for Internet and Society
16. Clinton, H. (2010, January). Internet freedom. Speech delivered at the Newseum, Washington, D.C. http://pacificeye.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/video-internet-freedom-speech-by-us-sec-of-state-clinton/ (http://pacificeye.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/video-internet-freedom-speech-by-us-sec-of-state-clinton/)
17. Coleman, S., Morrison, D. E. and Svenning, M. 2008. New media and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 2: 771 - 791.
18. Craig, S. and Magiotto, M. A. 1981. Political discontent and political action. Journal of Politics, 43 (2): 514 - 522.
19. Craig, S., Niemi, R. G. and Silver, G. E. 1990. Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study. Political Behavior, 12 (3): 289 - 314.
20. Dahl, R. A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Dai, X. 2000. Chinese politics of the Internet: Control and anti-control. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 13 (2): 181 - 194.
22. Daniyalzade, E., & Lipus, T.2007Facebook friend suggestion. http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2007/DaniyalzadeLipus-FacebookFriendSuggestion.pdf (http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2007/DaniyalzadeLipus-FacebookFriendSuggestion.pdf)
23. Di Gennaro, C. and Dutton, W. 2006. The Internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59 (2): 299 - 313.
24. Dubai School of Government. (2011). Facebook usage: Factors and analysis. Arab Social Media Report. Dubai, UAE: Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government. http://www.dsg.ae/en/asmr3/index.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 (http://www.dsg.ae/en/asmr3/index.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1)
25. Dunbar, R. 1998. " Theory of mind and the evolution of language ". In Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, Edited by: Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M. and SKnight, C. 92 - 110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Eltantawy, N. and Wiest, J. B. 2011. Social media in the Egyptian revolution: Reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5: 1207 - 1224.
27. Fedi, A., Mannarini, T. and Rovere, A. 2012. Beyond protest: Community changes as outcomes of mobilization. Advances in Psychology Study, 1 (1): 22 - 30.
28. Finkel, S. E. 1985. Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29 (4): 891 - 913.
29. Finkel, S. E. 1987. The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German panel. Journal of Politics, 49 (2): 441 - 464.
30. FoME. (2012, August). Expert meeting: From online activism to offline action: Digital media and democratic space. Bangkok, Thailand: German Friedrich Ebert Foundation and the German Forum for Media in Development (Forum Medien und Entwicklung). Program available at http://www.fesmedia-asia.org/uploads/media/Bangkok_Intro.pdf (http://www.fesmedia-asia.org/uploads/media/Bangkok_Intro.pdf)
31. Friedman, D. and McAdam, D. 1992. " Collective identity and activism. Networks, choices and the life of a social movement ". In Frontiers in social movement theory, Edited by: Morris, A. D. and McClurg Mueller, C. 156 - 172. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32. Gamson, W. A. 1968. Power and discontent, Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
33. Gibson, R. K., Howard, P. E. N. and Ward, S. 2000, August. " Internet connectedness political participation: A four-country study ". In Social capital, Quebec City, Quebec: Paper presented at the International Political Science Association Annual Conference.
34. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Nakwon, J. and Sebastian, V. 2012. Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 17 (3): 319 - 336.
35. Goldstein, J. 2007. The role of digital networked technologies in the Ukranian Orange Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
36. Goldstein, J. and Rotich, J. 2008. Digitally networked technology in Kenya's 2007-2008 post-election crisis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Berkman Centre for Internet & Society.
37. Groshek, J. 2009. The democratic effects of the Internet, 1994-2003: A cross-national inquiry of 152 countries. The International Communications Gazette, 71 (3): 115 - 136.
38. Groshek, J. 2012. Forecasting and observing: A cross-methodological consideration of Internet and mobile phone diffusion in the Egyptian revolt. International Communication Gazette, 74 (8): 750 - 768.
39. Hampton, K. N. 2003. Grieving for a lost network: Collective action in a wired suburb. The Information Society, 19: 417 - 428.
40. Heeks, R. 2010. Mainstreaming ICTs in development: The case against, Manchester, UK: University of Manchester, Centre for Development Informatics, ICT4DBlog.
41. Howard, P. N. 2011. The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: Information technology and political islam, New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Howard, P. N. and Hussain, M. M. 2011. The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22 (3): 35 - 48.
43. Howard, P. N. and Hussain, M. M. 2012, April. Democracy's fourth wave? Information technologies and the fuzzy causes of the Arab Spring, San Diego, CA: Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association (ISA).
44. ICT4Democracy in East Africa. (2012). Initiative funded by the Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions (SPIDER). http://www.cipesa.org/2013/05/ict4democracy-in-east-africa-april-2013-newsletter/ (http://www.cipesa.org/2013/05/ict4democracy-in-east-africa-april-2013-newsletter/)
45. Inglehart, R. 2003. How solid is mass support for democracy-and how can we measure it?. Political Science, 36 (1): 51 - 57.
46. Inglehart, R. and Welze, C. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence, New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. International Crisis Group. (2011). Popular Protest in North Africa and the Middle East (IV): Tunisia's Way, 106. Brussels, Belgium: The International Crisis Group. http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/tunisia/106-popular-protests-in-north-africa-and-the-middle-east-iv-tunisias-way.aspx (http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/middle-east-north-africa/north-africa/tunisia/106-popular-protests-in-north-africa-and-the-middle-east-iv-tunisias-way.aspx)
48. International IDEA. (2004). Differences between founding elections. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA. http://www.idea.int/vt/survey/voter_turnout5.cfm (http://www.idea.int/vt/survey/voter_turnout5.cfm)
49. Jasper, J. M. and Poulsen, J. D. 1995. Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42 (4): 493 - 512.
50. Kelly, J., & Etling, B. (2008). Mapping Iran's online public: Politics and culture in the Persian blogosphere (Working Paper No. 2008-01). Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University website:Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Kelly&Etling_Mapping_Irans_Online_Public_2008.pdf (http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/Kelly&Etling_Mapping_Irans_Online_Public_2008.pdf)
51. Kenski, K. and Jomini Stroud, N. 2006. Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2: 173 - 192.
52. King, S. J. (2007). Tunisia. Washington, D.C.: FreedomHouse. http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2007/tunisia (http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2007/tunisia)
53. Kroes, N. (2011, December). ICT for democracy: Supporting a global current of change. Speech delivered at The Hague, The Netherlands. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-11-866_en.htm?locale=en (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-11-866_en.htm?locale=en)
54. Kuebler, J. (2011). Overcoming the digital divide: The Internet and political mobilization in Egypt and Tunisia. CyberOrient, 5(1). http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=6212 (http://www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=6212)
55. Lee, J. and Lee, H. 2010. The computer-mediated communication network: Exploring the linkage between the online community and social capital. New Media and Society, 12 (5): 711 - 727.
56. Lee, K. M. 2006. Effects of Internet use on college students' political efficacy. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9 (4): 415 - 422.
57. Lipset, S. 1960. Political man: The social bases of politics, New York: Doubleday.
58. Lynch, M. 2012. The Arab uprising: The unfinished revolutions of the new Middle East, New York: Public Affairs.
59. Maddux, J. E. 2001. " Self-efficacy: The power of believing you can ". In Handbook of positive psychology, Edited by: Snyder, C. R. and Lopez, S. L. 277 - 287. New York: Oxford University Press.
60. Marzouki, Y., Skandrani-Marzouki, I., Béjaoui, M., Hammoudi, H. and Bellaj, T. 2012. The contribution of Facebook to the 2011 Tunisian revolution: A cyber psychological insight. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15 (5): 1 - 8.
61. Meier, P. (2011). ICTs, democracy, activism and dictatorship: Comprehensive literature review. iRevolution: From Innovation to Revolution (Doctoral Dissertation, Vol. 2012). http://irevolution.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/meier-dissertation-chapter-2-from-evidence-to-model-v4.pdf (http://irevolution.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/meier-dissertation-chapter-2-from-evidence-to-model-v4.pdf)
62. Murphy, E. C. 2009. Theorizing ICTs in the Arab World: Informational capitalism and the public sphere. International Studies Quarterly, 53: 1131 - 1153.
63. Myers, M. 2009. Funding for media development by major donors outside the United States: A report to the center for international media assistance, Washington, DC: National Endowment for Democracy.
64. Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C. and Mattei, F. 1991. Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. The American Political Science Review, 85 (4): 1407 - 1413.
65. Norris, P. 2001. Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Noueihed, L. and Warren, A. 2012. The battle for the Arab spring: Revolution, counter revolution and the making of a new era, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67. OpenNet Inititative. (2009). Internet filtering in Tunisia. https://opennet.net/sites/opennet.net/files/ONI_Tunisia_Country_Study.pdf (http://https://opennet.net/sites/opennet.net/files/ONI_Tunisia_Country_Study.pdf)
68. Papacharissi, Z. and Oliveira, M. D. F. 2012. Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62 (2): 266 - 282.
69. Pattie, C. and Johnston, R. 1998. Voter turnout at the Brithish general election of 1992: Rational choice, social standing or political efficacy?. European Journal of Political Research, 33 (2): 263 - 283.
70. Pollock, J. (2011, September/October). Streetbook: How Egyptian and Tunisian youth hacked the Arab Spring. MIT Technology Review. http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/425137/streetbook/ (http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/425137/streetbook/)
71. Ragin, C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Rahimi, B. 2003. Cyberdissent: The Internet in revolutionary Iran. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 7 (3): 101 - 115.
73. Roberts, H., Zuckerman, E., York, J., Faris, R., & Palfrey, J. (2011). [Survey results]. International bloggers and internet control. The Berkman Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series, 2011-06. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/International_Bloggers_and_Internet_Control_Results_0.pdf (http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/International_Bloggers_and_Internet_Control_Results_0.pdf)
74. Rojas, H. and Puig-i-Abril, E. 2009. Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14 (4): 902 - 927.
75. Saidani, M. 2012. Revolution and counterrevolution in Tunisia: The forty days that shook the country. Boundary 2, 39 (1): 43 - 54.
76. Salganik, M. J. and Heckathorn, D. D. 2004. Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34 (1): 193 - 239.
77. Scheufele, D.A. and Nisbet, M.C. 2002. Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Press and Politics, 7 (3): 55 - 75.
78. Schraeder, P. J. and Redissi, H. 2011. Ben Ali's fall. Journal of Democracy, 22 (3): 5 - 18.
79. Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67038/clay-shirky/the-political-power-of-social-media (http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67038/clay-shirky/the-political-power-of-social-media)
80. SIDA. 2009. ICTs for democracy: Information and communication technologies for the enhancement of democracy-with a focus on empowerment, Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
81. Stepanova, E. (2011). The role of information and communication technologies in the Arab spring: Implications beyond the region. Ponars Eurasia: New Approaches to Research and Security in Eurasia (Memo No. 159). http://ponarseurasia.com/sites/default/files/policy-memos-pdf/pepm_159.pdf (http://ponarseurasia.com/sites/default/files/policy-memos-pdf/pepm_159.pdf)
82. Tezcür, G. M. 2012. Democracy promotion, authoritarian resiliency, and political unrest in Iran. Democratization, 19 (1): 120 - 140.
83. USAID. 2012. Democracy fellowship SPiquotSPicivil society & media team.SPiquotSPi, Washington, DC: USAID.
84. van Laer, J. 2011. Why people protest, PhD thesis, Universiteit Antwerpen, Faculteit Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen, Antwerp: Belgium.
85. Weber, I. 2007. Internet and self regulation in China: The cultural logic of controlled commodification. Media Culture and Society, 29: 772 - 789.
86. Weitz, R. 2010, April. Iran's grassroot voices and the blogosphere. Eurasia Review
87. Xenos, M. and Moy, P. 2007. Direct and differential effects of the internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57: 704 - 718.
88. Yang, G. 2003. The Internet and the rise of transational Chinese cultural sphere. Media Culture and Society, 25 (4): 469 - 490.
89. Yu, H. 2006. From active audience of media citizenship: The case of post-Mao China. Social Semiotics, 16 (2): 303 - 326.
90. Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. and Checkoway, B. 1992. Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20 (6): 707 - 727.
91. Zimmerman, M. A. and Rappaport, J. 1988. Citizen participation, percieved control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16 (5): 725 - 749.
92. Zisenwine, D. 2004. Tunisia's elections: The long road to democracy. Tel Aviv Notes, 113: 1 - 3.