The role of self and peer assessment in Higher Education

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2022, Pages 683-692

  Iglesias Perez M C ^a   Vidal Puga, J ^a   Pino Juste, M R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

concordance analysis; continuous assignment; Higher Education; peer assignment; Self assignment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85087358129     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Asikainen, H., V. Virtanen, L. Postareff, and P. Heino. 2014. “ The Validity and Students’ Experiences of Peer Assessment in a Large Introductory Class of Gene Technology.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 43: 197–205. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.07.002.
2. Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. 1986. “ Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement.” The Lancet 327 (8476): 307–310. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
3. Bukowski, W. M., M. Castellanos, and R. J. Persram. 2017. “ The Current Status of Peer Assessment Techniques and Sociometric Methods.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 157: 75–82. doi: 10.1002/cad.20209.
4. Cantabella, M., B. López-Ayuso, A. Muñoz, and A. Caballero. 2016. “ A Tool for Monitoring Lecturers’ Interactions with Learning Management Systems.” Revista española de Documentación Científica 39: e153. doi: 10.3989/redc.2016.4.1354. (In Spanish).
5. Carbonaro, A., and M. Ravaioli. 2017. “ Peer Assessment to Promote Deep Learning and to Reduce a Gender Gap in the Traditional Introductory Programming Course.” Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society 13 (3): 121–129. doi: 10.20368/1971-8829/1398.
6. Cartney, P. 2014. “ Exploring the use of Peer Assessment as a Vehicle for Closing the Gap between Feedback Given and Feedback Used.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 551–564. doi: 10.1080/02602931003632381.
7. Cheng, K.-H., J.-C. Liang, and C.-C. Tsai. 2015. “ Examining the Role of Feedback Messages in Undergraduate Students’ Writing Performance During an Online Peer Assessment Activity.” The Internet and Higher Education 25: 78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001.
8. Deeley, S. J. 2014. “ Summative co-Assessment: A Deep Learning Approach to Enhancing Employability Skills and Attributes.” Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (1): 39–51. doi: 10.1177/1469787413514649.
9. Dochy, F. J. R. C., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. 1999. “ The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-Assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (3): 331–350. doi: 10.1080/03075079912331379935.
10. Fleiss, J. L. 1999. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
11. González de Sande, J. C., and J. I. Godino-Llorente. 2014. “ Peer Assessment and Self-Assessment: Effective Learning Tools in Higher Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education 30 (3): 711–721.
12. Hodgson, P., K. Chan, and J. Liu. 2014. “ Outcomes of Synergetic Peer Assessment: First-Year Experience.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (2): 168–178. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.803027.
13. Ibarra Saiz, M.S., and G. Rodríguez Gómez. 2014. “ Participatory Assessment Methods: An Analysis of the Perception of University Students and Teaching Staff.” Journal of Educational Research 32: 339 - 362. doi: 10.6018/rie.32.2.172941. (In Spanish).
14. Jones, I., and L. Alcock. 2014. “ Peer Assessment Without Assessment Criteria.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1774–1787. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.821974.
15. Lin, L., A. S. Hedayat, B. Sinha, and M. Yang. 2002. “ Statistical Methods in Assessing Agreement.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 (457): 257–270. doi: 10.1198/016214502753479392.
16. Martín-Monje, E., E. Vázquez-Cano, and M. Fernández. 2014. “ Peer Assessment of Language Learning Resources in Virtual Learning Environments with e-Rubrics.” International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 6 (4): 321–342. doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2014.069018.
17. McConlogue, T. 2015. “ Making Judgements: Investigating the Process of Composing and Receiving Peer Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (9): 1495–1506. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.868878.
18. Mulder, R. A., J. M. Pearce, and C. Baik. 2014. “ Peer Review in Higher Education: Student Perceptions Before and After Participation.” Active Learning in Higher Education 15 (2): 157–171. doi: 10.1177/1469787414527391.
19. Panadero, E., and M. Alqassab. 2019. “ An Empirical Review of Anonymity Effects in Peer Assessment, Peer Feedback, Peer Review, Peer Evaluation and Peer Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (8): 1253–1278. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186.
20. Panadero, E., and G. T. L. Brown. 2017. “ Teachers’ Reasons for Using Peer Assessment: Positive Experience Predicts Use.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 32 (1): 133–156. doi: 10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5.
21. Raes, A., E. Vanderhoven, and T. Schellens. 2015. “ Increasing Anonymity in Peer Assessment by Using Classroom Response Technology Within Face-to-Face Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (1): 178–193. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.823930.
22. Seifert, T., and O. Feliks. 2019. “ Online Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment as a Tool to Enhance Student-Teachers’ Assessment Skills.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (2): 169–185. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1487023.
23. Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “ Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions About the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
24. Vanderhoven, E., A. Raes, H. Montrieux, T. Rotsaert, and T. Schellens. 2015. “ What If Pupils Can Assess Their Peers Anonymously? A Quasi-Experimental Study.” Computers and Education 81: 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001.
25. Von Stumm, S., T. Chamorro-Premuzic, and A. Furnham. 2009. “ Decomposing Self-Estimates of Intelligence: Structure and Sex Differences Across 12 Nations.” British Journal of Psychology 100 (2): 429–442. doi: 10.1348/000712608X357876.
26. Wang, Y., H. Li, Y. Feng, Y. Jiang, and Y. Liu. 2012. “ Assessment of Programming Language Learning Based on Peer Code Review Model: Implementation and Experience Report.” Computers & Education 59 (2): 412–422. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.007.
27. Wanner, T., and E. Palmer. 2018. “ Formative Self-and Peer Assessment for Improved Student Learning: The Crucial Factors of Design, Teacher Participation and Feedback.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (7): 1032–1047. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698.