Dependency parsing as a classification problem

Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL-X

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Yuret, Deniz ^a  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACHINE LEARNING; SYNTACTICS;

ATTRIBUTE SELECTION; DECISION LISTS; DEPENDENCY PARSING; STANDARD MACHINES; TRAINING DATA; TREEBANKS; WORD-PAIRS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 85086489655     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1596276.1596323     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A. Abeillé, editor. 2003. Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora, volume 20 of Text, Speech and Language Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
2. S. Afonso, E. Bick, R. Haber, and D. Santos. 2002. Floresta sintá(c)tica.: a treebank for Portuguese. In Proc. of the Third Intern. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 1698-1703.
3. N. B. Atalay, K. Ofiazer, and B. Say. 2003. The annotation process in the Turkish treebank. In Proc. of the 4th Intern. Workshop on Linguistically Interpreteted Corpora (LINC).
4. A. Böhmová, J. Hajific, E. Hajificová, and B. Hladká. 2003. The PDT: a 3-level annotation scenario. In Abeillé (Abeillé, 2003), chapter 7.
5. S. Brants, S. Dipper, S. Hansen, W. Lezius, and G. Smith. 2002. The TIGER treebank. In Proc. of the First Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT).
6. S. Buchholz, E. Marsi, A. Dubey, and Y. Krymolowski. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proc. of the Tenth Conf. on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X). SIGNLL.
7. K. Chen, C. Luo, M. Chang, F. Chen, C. Chen, C. Huang, and Z. Gao. 2003. Sinica treebank: Design criteria, representational issues and implementation. In Abeillé (Abeillé, 2003), chapter 13, pages 231-248.
8. M. Civit Torruella and Ma A. Martí Antonín. 2002. Design principles for a Spanish treebank. In Proc. of the First Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT).
9. S. Dfizeroski, T. Erjavec, N. Ledinek, P. Pajas, Z. Žabokrtsky, and A. Žele. 2006. Towards a Slovene dependency treebank. In Proc. of the Fifth Intern. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC).
10. J. Hajific, O. Smrfiz, P. Zemánek, J. Snaidauf, and E. Befiska. 2004. Prague Arabic dependency treebank: Development in data and tools. In Proc. of the NEMLAR Intern. Conf. on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, pages 110-117.
11. Y. Kawata and J. Bartels. 2000. Stylebook for the Japanese treebank in VERBMOBIL. Verbmobil-Report 240, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universit ät Tübingen.
12. M. T. Kromann. 2003. The Danish dependency treebank and the underlying linguistic theory. In Proc. of the Second Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT).
13. Volkan Kurt. 2005. Protein structure prediction using decision lists. Master's thesis, Koç University.
14. J. Nilsson, J. Hall, and J. Nivre. 2005. MAMBA meets TIGER: Reconstructing a Swedish treebank from antiquity. In Proc. of the NODALIDA Special Session on Treebanks.
15. K. Ofiazer, B. Say, D. Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and G. Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Abeillé (Abeillé, 2003), chapter 15.
16. Ronald L. Rivest. 1987. Learning decision lists. Machine Learning, 2:229-246.
17. L. van der Beek, G. Bouma, R. Malouf, and G. van Noord. 2002. The Alpino dependency treebank. In Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN).
18. Deniz Yuret and Ferhan Ture. 2006. Learning morphological disambiguation rules for Turkish. In HLTNAACL 06.