Sociocultural perspectives on collaborative learning: Toward collaborative knowledge creation

The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 57-73

  Hakkarainen, Kai ^a   Paavola, Sami ^a   Kangas, Kaiju ^b   Seitamaa Hakkarainen, Pirita ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086210946     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203837290-10     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Baird, D. (2004). Thing knowledge: A philosophy of scientific instruments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Béguin, P., & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173-190.
3. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition (pp. 188-228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18, 32-42.
6. Clay, M. (1998). By different path to common outcomes. York, ME: Stenhouse.
7. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York: Norton.
9. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
10. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Engeström, Y, Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211-224). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
12. Engeström, Y., Puonti, L., & Seppänen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 151-186). London: Sharpe.
13. Enyedy, N., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). From dialogue to monologue and back: Middle spaces in computer-mediated learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(4), 413-439.
14. Gutierrez, K., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445-472.
15. Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213-231.
16. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives (Advances in Learning and Instruction Series). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
17. Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1-36.
18. Hewitt, J. (1996). Progress toward a knowledge building community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Education, University of Toronto.
19. Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2007). The Artifact project: History, science and design inquiry in technology enhanced learning at elementary level. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(3), 213-237.
20. Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175-188). London: Routledge.
21. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Marton, F., & Trigwell, K. (2000). Variatio est mater studiorum. Higher Education Research, 19, 380-395.
24. Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181-192.
25. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005) Technology-mediation and tutoring: How do they shape progressive inquiry discourse? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 527-565.
26. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2009). From meaning making to joint construction of knowledge practices and artefacts—A trialogical approach to CSCL. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 83-92). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
29. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Modeling innovative knowledge communities: A knowl-edge-creation approach to learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557-576.
30. Packer, M., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227-241.
31. Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge.
32. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2006). Contradictions in theorizing and implementing communities in education. Educational Research Review, 1, 27-40.
33. Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
34. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
35. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
36. Schatzki, T. (2000). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
37. Scribner, S., & Cole, M (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 109-136.
39. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.
40. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Viilo, M., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2011). Supporting the technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry and design project-A teacher’s reflections on practices. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 17, 51-72.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.