Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model

Annals of Neurology

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 383-393

  van der Vliet, Rick ^a   Selles, Ruud W ^a,b   Andrinopoulou, Eleni Rosalina ^a   Nijland, Rinske ^c,d   Ribbers, Gerard M ^a,b   Frens, Maarten A ^a   Meskers, Carel ^c   Kwakkel, Gert ^c,d,e  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Erasmus MC University Medical Center and Rijndam Rehabilitation Center Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center Reade   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; FUGL MEYER MOTOR UPPER EXTREMITY SCALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UPPER LIMB; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPLICATION; DISABILITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; STROKE REHABILITATION; TIME FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTOR DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TIME FACTORS; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 85078663363     PISSN: 03645134     EISSN: 15318249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25679     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:64–71.
2. Winters C, van Wegen EEH, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015;29:614–622.
3. Smith M-C, Byblow WD, Barber PA, Stinear CM. Proportional recovery from lower limb motor impairment after stroke. Stroke 2017;48:1400–1403.
4. Veerbeek JM, Winters C, van Wegen EEH, Kwakkel G. Is the proportional recovery rule applicable to the lower limb after a first-ever ischemic stroke? PLoS One 2018;13:e0189279.
5. Nijboer TCW, Kollen BJ, Kwakkel G. Time course of visuospatial neglect early after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study. Cortex 2013;49:2021–2027.
6. Lazar RM, Speizer AE, Festa JR, et al. Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:530–534.
7. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:281–299.
8. Gresham GE. Stroke outcome research. Stroke 1986;17:358–360.
9. Ward NS. Restoring brain function after stroke—bridging the gap between animals and humans. Nat Rev Neurol 2017;13:244–255.
10. Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS, et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2017;12:480–493.
11. Bernhardt J, Godecke E, Johnson L, Langhorne P. Early rehabilitation after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2017;30:48–54.
12. Byblow W, Schlaug G, Wittenberg G. What's the perfect dose for practice to make perfect? Ann Neurol 2016;80:339–341.
13. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:232–240.
14. Krakauer J, Marshall R. The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited. Ann Neurol 2015;78:845–847.
15. Feng W, Wang J, Chhatbar PY, et al. Corticospinal tract lesion load: an imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes. Ann Neurol 2015;78:860–870.
16. Byblow WD, Stinear CM, Barber PA, et al. Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity. Ann Neurol 2015;78:848–859.
17. Buch ER, Rizk S, Nicolo P, et al. Predicting motor improvement after stroke with clinical assessment and diffusion tensor imaging. Neurology 2016;86:1924–1925.
18. Marshall RS, Zarahn E, Alon L, et al. Early imaging correlates of subsequent motor recovery after stroke. Ann Neurol 2009;65:596–602.
19. Hope TMH, Friston K, Price CJ, et al. Recovery after stroke: not so proportional after all? Brain 2019;142:15–22.
20. Hawe RL, Scott SH, Dukelow SP. Taking proportional out of stroke recovery. Stroke 2019;50:204–211.
21. Kundert R, Goldsmith J, Veerbeek JM, et al. What the proportional recovery rule is (and is not): methodological and statistical considerations. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019;33:876–887.
22. Kwakkel G, Winters C, van Wegen EEH, et al. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016;30:804–816.
23. Nijland RHMM, van Wegen EEHH, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, Kwakkel G. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke 2010;41:745–750.
24. Kwakkel G. 4D-EEG: uncovering the neurological mechanisms behind upper limb functional recovery after stroke. Available at: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4084. Accessed January 18, 2019.
25. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke 2005;36:e100–143.
26. Quinn T, Paolucci S, Sunnerhagen K, et al. Evidence-based stroke rehabilitation: an expanded guidance document from the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:99–111.
27. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, et al. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991;337:1521–1526.
28. Meyer BC, Hemmen TM, Jackson CM, Lyden PD. Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for use in stroke clinical trials: prospective reliability and validity. Stroke 2002;33:1261–1266.
29. Bohannon R. Motricity index scores are valid indicators of paretic upper extremity strength following stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 1999;11:59–61.
30. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:576–579.
31. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, et al. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1993;73:447–454.
32. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, 2013.
33. Malsiner-Walli G, Frühwirth-Schnatter S, Grün B. Model-based clustering based on sparse finite Gaussian mixtures. Stat Comput 2016;26:303–324.
34. Rousseau J, Mengersen K. Asymptotic behaviour of the posterior distribution in overfitted mixture models. J R Stat Soc Series B StatMethodol 2011;73:689–710.
35. Nasserinejad K, van Rosmalen J, de Kort W, Lesaffre E. Comparison of criteria for choosing the number of classes in Bayesian finite mixture models. PLoS One 2017;12:e0168838.
36. Zarahn E, Alon L, Ryan SL, et al. Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke. Cereb Cortex 2011;21:2712–2721.
37. Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, et al. Proportional motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2017;48:795–798.
38. Schambra HM, Xu J, Branscheidt M, et al. Differential poststroke motor recovery in an arm versus hand muscle in the absence of motor evoked potentials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019;33:568–580.
39. Guggisberg AG, Nicolo P, Cohen LG, et al. Longitudinal structural and functional differences between proportional and poor motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017;31:1029–1041.
40. Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys Ther 2012;92:791–798.
41. Kwakkel G, Van Wegen E, Burridge JH, et al. Standardized measurement of quality of upper limb movement after stroke: consensus-based core recommendations from the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke 2019;14:783–791.
42. Garraway WM, Akhtar AJ, Smith DL, Smith ME. The triage of stroke rehabilitation. J Epidemiol Community Health 1981;35:39–44.
43. Pekna M, Pekny M, Nilsson M. Modulation of neural plasticity as a basis for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2012;43:2819–2828.
44. Bernhardt J, Borschmann K, Boyd L, et al. Moving rehabilitation research forward: developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Int J Stroke 2016;11:454–458.
45. Winters C, Heymans MW, van Wegen EEH, Kwakkel G. How to design clinical rehabilitation trials for the upper paretic limb early post stroke? Trials 2016;17:468.
46. Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M, et al. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 2000;123:2512–2518.