The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited

Annals of Neurology

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 845-847

  Krakauer, John W ^a   Marshall, Randolph S ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONVALESCENCE; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; NEUROREHABILITATION; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL TRACT; SPONTANEOUS BIOLOGICAL RECOVERY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; FEMALE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SKELETAL MUSCLE; UPPER LIMB;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84954446388     PISSN: 03645134     EISSN: 15318249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24537     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E,. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 281-299.
2. Zeiler SR, Krakauer JW,. The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; 26: 609-616.
3. Carmichael ST,. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 735-742.
4. Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF,. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 923-931.
5. Murphy TH, Corbett D,. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 861-872.
6. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, et al., Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 64-71.
7. Fugl-Meyer AR,. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of physical properties. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1980; 7: 85-93.
8. Zarahn E, Alon L, Ryan SL, et al., Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fmri 48 h poststroke. Cereb Cortex 2011; 21: 2712-2721.
9. Winters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G,. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 614-622.
10. Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, et al., Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke 2010; 41: 1485-1488.
11. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE,. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 232-240.
12. Byblow W, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Ackerley S,. Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity. Ann Neurol 2015 Jul 7. doi: 10.1002/ana.24472. [Epub ahead of print]
13. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Anwar S, Byblow WD,. The prep algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain 2012; 135: 2527-2535.
14. Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al., Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1692-1698.
15. Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D,. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 1245-1254.
16. Ng KL, Gibson EM, Hubbard R, et al., Fluoxetine maintains a state of heightened responsiveness to motor training early after stroke in a mouse model. Stroke 2015; 46: 2951-2960.
17. Feng W, Wang J, Landsittel D, et al., Corticospinal tract lesion load-an imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes. Ann Neurol 2015 Aug 20. doi: 10.1002/ana.24510. [Epub ahead of print]
18. Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Ruber T, Schlaug G,. Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; 33: 1040-1051.