Proportional Motor Recovery after Stroke: Implications for Trial Design

Stroke

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 795-798

  Stinear, Cathy M ^a,b   Byblow, Winston D ^a,b   Ackerley, Suzanne J ^a,b   Smith, Marie Claire ^a,b   Borges, Victor M ^a,b   Barber, P Alan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b Centre for Brain Research   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

impairment; magnetic resonance imaging; rehabilitation; stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM WEAKNESS; ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL TRACT; STROKE REHABILITATION; STUDY DESIGN; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STROKE; UPPER LIMB; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PYRAMIDAL TRACTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85011275713     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016020     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741-754. doi: 10.1016/ S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
2. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, Speizer A, Chong JY, Lazar RM, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:64-71. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305302.
3. Zarahn E, Alon L, Ryan SL, Lazar RM, Vry MS, Weiller C, et al. Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21:2712-2721. doi: 10.1093/cercor/ bhr047.
4. Winters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:614-622. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562115.
5. Byblow WD, Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe MA, Ackerley SJ. Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:848-859. doi: 10.1002/ana.24472.
6. Feng W, Wang J, Chhatbar PY, Doughty C, Landsittel D, Lioutas VA, et al. Corticospinal tract lesion load: an imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:860-870. doi: 10.1002/ana.24510.
7. Buch ER, Rizk S, Nicolo P, Cohen LG, Schnider A, Guggisberg AG. Predicting motor improvement after stroke with clinical assessment and diffusion tensor imaging. Neurology. 2016;86:1924-1925. doi: 10.1212/ WNL.0000000000002675.
8. Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke. 2010;41:1485-1488. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.109.577338.
9. Stinear C. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:1228-1232. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70247-7.
10. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, Anwar S, Byblow WD. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain. 2012;135(pt 8):2527-2535. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws146.
11. Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Nunes RG, Clare S, et al. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion- weighted MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:1077-1088. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10609.
12. Zhu LL, Lindenberg R, Alexander MP, Schlaug G. Lesion load of the corticospinal tract predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:910-915. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.577023.
13. Burke E, Dodakian L, See J, McKenzie A, Riley JD, Le V, et al. A multimodal approach to understanding motor impairment and disability after stroke. J Neurol. 2014;261:1178-1186. doi: 10.1007/s00415-014-7341-8.
14. Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:845-847. doi: 10.1002/ana.24537.