Use of the Knowledge-Based System LOG-IDEAH to Assess Failure Modes of Masonry Buildings, Damaged by L'Aquila Earthquake in 2009

Frontiers in Built Environment

Volumn 5, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Novelli, Viviana I ^a   D'Ayala, Dina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

failure modes; knowledge based system; masonry buildings; post earthquake assessment; seismic damage

Indexed keywords

EID: 85072734365     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22973362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00095     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Agarwal M., Goel S., (2014). Expert system and it's requirement engineering process, in Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE) (Jaipur: IEEE).
2. Anagnostopoulos S., Moretti M., (2008). Post-earthquake emergency assessment of building damage, safety and usability—Part 1: technical issues. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 28, 223–232. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.05.007
3. Andreotti C., Liberatore D., Sorrentino L., (2014). Identifying seismic local collapse mechanisms in unreinforced masonry buildings through 3D laser scanning. Key Eng. Mater. 628, 79–84. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.628.79
4. Aspinall W. P., Cooke R. M., (2013). Quantifying scientific uncertainty from expert judgement elicitation, in Risk and Uncertainty Assessment for Natural Hazards (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 64. 10.1017/CBO9781139047562.005
5. Avvenuti M., Cesarini D., Cimino M., (2013). Mars, a multi-agent system for assessing rowers' coordination via motion-based stigmergy. Sensors 13, 12218–12243. 10.3390/s13091221824036582
6. Bertelli S., Rossetto T., Ioannou I., (2018). Derivation of empirical fragility functions from the 2009 l'aquila earthquake, in Prooceedings 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vol. 16 (Thessaloníki: European Association of Earthquake Engineering).
7. Boose J. H., (1985). A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on personal construct psychology. In. J. Man Machine Stud. 23, 495–525. 10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80055-9
8. Buchanan B. G., Duda R. O., (1983).“Principles of rule-based expert systems,” in Advances in Computers, Vol. 22, ed Yovits M. C., (Indianapolis, IN: Elsevier), 163–216. 10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60129-1
9. Caragea C., McNeese N., Jaiswal A., Traylor G., Kim H. W., Mitra P.. (2011). Classifying text messages for the Haiti earthquake, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM2011) (Lisbon).
10. Chan K., Lam W., (2005). Gene ontology classification of biomedical literatures using context association, in Asia Information Retrieval Symposium (Berlin; Heidelberg). 10.1007/11562382_49
11. D'Ayala D., Paganoni S., (2011). Assessment and analysis of damage in L'Aquila historic city centre after 6th April 2009. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 9, 81–104. 10.1007/s10518-010-9224-4
12. D'Ayala D., Speranza E., (2003). Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 19, 479–509. 10.1193/1.1599896
13. de Diego I. M., Siordia O. S., Fernández-Isabel A., Conde C., Cabello E., (2019). Subjective data arrangement using clustering techniques for training expert systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 115, 1–15. 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.058
14. de Oliveira G. A., Tcheou M. P., Lovisolo L., (2018). Artificial neural networks for dictionary selection in adaptive greedy decomposition algorithms with reduced complexity, in 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (London, UK). 10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489708
15. Djamal B., Ernesto D., Grosky W., Abdelkader H., Amit S., Wagner R., (2017). Database and Expert Systems Applications, in 28th International Conference, DEXA 2017, Lyon, France, August 28–31, 2017, Proceedings, Part II (Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Springer).
16. Doglioni F., Moretti A., Petrini V., (1994). Le chiese e il terremoto, C.N.R.-G.N.D.T. Edizioni L/NT Trieste, Italy Sofronie R., 1982. Behaviour of eastern churches in earthquakes, in Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. (Athens)
17. Dolce M., Di Bucci D., (2017). Comparing recent Italian earthquakes. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15, 497–533. 10.1007/s10518-015-9773-7
18. Fersini E., Messina E., Pozzi F. A., (2017). Earthquake management: a decision support system based on natural language processing. J. Ambient Intell. Human. Comput. 8, 37–45. 10.1007/s12652-016-0373-4
19. Geiß C., Taubenböck H., Tyagunov S., Tisch A., Post J., Lakes T., (2014). Assessment of seismic building vulnerability from space. Earthquake Spectra 30, 1553–1583. 10.1193/121812EQS350M
20. Gelfond M., Lifschitz V., (1988). The stable model semantics for Logic programming, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming (Seattle, WA: MIT Press).
21. Gelfond M., Lifschitz V., (1991). Classical negation in Logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Comput. 9, 365–386. 10.1007/BF03037169
22. German S., Brilakis I., DesRoches R., (2012). Rapid entropy-based detection and properties measurement of concrete spalling with machine vision for post-earthquake safety assessments. Adv. Eng. Inform. 26, 846–858. 10.1016/j.aei.2012.06.005
23. Girju R., (2003). Automatic detection of causal relations for question answering, in Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering-Volume 12 Association for Computational Linguistics (Sapporo).
24. Grünthal G., (1998). Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie: Volume 15 – European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Luxembourg: European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology.
25. Han M., Lee Y. K., Lee S., (2012). Comprehensive context recognizer based on multimodal sensors in a smartphone. Sensors 12, 12588–12605. 10.3390/s120912588
26. Inui T., Inui K., Matsumoto Y., (2005). Acquiring causal knowledge from text using the connective marker tame. ACM Transac. Asian Lang. Inform. Process. 4, 435–474. 10.1145/1113308.1113313
27. Ioannou I., Borg R., Novelli V., Melo J., Alexander D., Kongar I.. (2012). The 29th May 2012 Emilia Romagna Earthquake. EPICentre Field Observation Report. No. EPI-FO-290512. EEFIT - The Institution of Structural Engineers Available online at: https://www.istructe.org/get-involved/supported-organisations/eefit/.
28. ISTAT (2001). Censimento Generale Dell'industria e dei Servizi. Distretti Industriali e Sistemi Locali Del lavoro 2001. Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica.
29. Ittoo A., Bouma G., (2011). Extracting explicit and implicit causal relations from sparse, domain-specific texts, in International Conference on Application of Natural Language to Information Systems. (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer).
30. Kaushik H., Bevington J., Jaiswal K., Lizundia B., Shrestha S., (2016). Buildings (EERI Earthquake Reconnaissance Team Report: M7. 8 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake on April 25, 2015 and its Aftershocks). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
31. Keyport R. N., Oommen T., Martha T. R., Sajinkumar K. S., Gierke J. S., (2018). A comparative analysis of pixel- and object-based detection of landslides from very high-resolution images. Int. J. Earth Observ. Geoinform. 64, 1–11. 10.1016/j.jag.2017.08.015
32. Khoo C. S., Kornfilt J., Oddy R. N., Myaeng S. H., (1998). Automatic extraction of cause-effect information from newspaper text without knowledge-based inferencing. Literary Ling. Comput. 13, 177–186. 10.1093/llc/13.4.177
33. Kiritsis D., (1995). A review of knowledge-based expert systems for process planning. Methods and problems. Int. J. Adv. Manufactur. Technol. 10, 240–262. 10.1007/BF01186876
34. Konishi T., Suga Y., (2018). Landslide detection using COSMO-Sky Med images: a case study of a landslide event on Kii Peninsula, Japan. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 51, 205–221. 10.1080/22797254.2017.1418185
35. Lagomarsino S., Brencich A., Bussolino F., Moretti A., Pagnini L. C., Podesta' S. (1997). Una nuova metodologia per il rilievo del danno alle chiese: prime considerazioni sui meccanismi attivati dal sisma, in Ingegneria Sismica Anno XIV n.3, settembre –dicembre (Bologna).
36. Li P., Mao K., (2019). Knowledge-oriented convolutional neural network for causal relation extraction from natural language texts. Expert Syst. Appl. 115, 512–523. 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.009
37. McDermott D., (1982). A temporal logic for reasoning about processes and plans. Cogn. Sci. 6, 101–155. 10.1207/s15516709cog0602_1
38. Novelli V., D'Ayala D., (2012). Assessment of the most damaged historic centres of the Region Emilia Romagna due to the earthquake of the 20th and 29th of May 2012. Ingegn. Sism. 29, 59–71.
39. Novelli V., D'Ayala D., (2015). LOG-IDEAH: Logic trees for identification of damage due to earthquakes for architectural heritage. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13, 153–176. 10.1007/s10518-014-9622-0
40. Novelli V., De Vos M., Padget J., D'Ayala D., (2012). LOG-IDEAH: ASP for architectonic asset preservation, in Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'12), eds Dovier A., Santos V., Costa V., (Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik), 393–403. 10.1017/S1471068412000300
41. Novelli V. I., D'Ayala D., Makhloufi N., Benouar D., Zekagh A., (2015). A procedure for the identification of the seismic vulnerability at territorial scale. Application to the Casbah of Algiers. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13, 177–202. 10.1007/s10518-014-9666-1
42. Perol T., Gharbi M., Denolle M., (2018). Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location. Sci. Adv. 4:e1700578. 10.1126/sciadv.170057829487899
43. Pittore M., Wieland M., (2013). Toward a rapid probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment using satellite and ground-based remote sensing. Nat. Hazards 68, 115–145. 10.1007/s11069-012-0475-z
44. Powers D. M. W., (2011). Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. J. Mach. Learn. Technol. 2, 37–63.
45. Robinson B., Power R., Cameron M., (2013). A sensitive twitter earthquake detector, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (Rio DE Janeiro: ACM). 10.1145/2487788.2488101
46. Rossetto T., D'Ayala D., Gori F., Persio R., Han J., Novelli V.. (2014). The value of multiple earthquake missions: the EEFIT L'Aquila Earthquake experience. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12, 277–305. 10.1007/s10518-014-9588-y
47. Sakaki T., Okazaki M., Matsuo Y., (2010). Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors, in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (ACM). 10.1145/1772690.1772777
48. Sextos A., De Risi R., Pagliaroli A., Foti S., Passeri F., Ausilio E.. (2018). Local site effects and incremental damage of buildings during the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra 34, 1639–1669. 10.1193/100317EQS194M
49. Sisti R., Di Ludovico M., Borri A., Prota A., (2018). Damage assessment and the effectiveness of prevention: the response of ordinary unreinforced masonry buildings in Norcia during the Central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 2018, 1–21. 10.1007/s10518-018-0448-z
50. Spence R., (2014). The full-scale laboratory: the practice of post-earthquake reconnaissance missions and their contribution to earthquake engineering, in Perspectives on European Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (Cham: Springer), 1–52. 10.1007/978-3-319-07118-3_1
51. Stone H., Putrino V., D'Ayala D., (2018). earthquake damage data collection using omnidirectional imagery. Front. Built Environ. 4:51 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00051
52. Tertulliani A., Arcoraci L., Berardi M., Bernardini F., Camassi R., Castellano C.. (2011). An application of EMS98 in a medium-sized city: the case of L'Aquila (Central Italy) after the April 6, 2009 Mw 6.3 earthquake. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 9, 67–80. 10.1007/s10518-010-9188-4
53. Van Rijsbergen C. J., (1977). A theoretical basis for the use of co-occurrence data in information retrieval. J. Docum. 33, 106–119. 10.1108/eb026637
54. Wang G., Wei Y., Qiao S., Lin P., Chen Y., (2018). Generalized Inverses: Theory and Computations. Vol. 53. Beijing: Springer. 10.1007/978-981-13-0146-9
55. Wick M. R., Slagle J. R., (1989). The partitioned support network for expert system justification. IEEE Transac. Syst. Man Cybernet. 19, 528–535. 10.1109/21.31059
56. Wieland M., Liu W., Yamazaki F., (2016). Learning change from synthetic aperture radar images: performance evaluation of a support vector machine to detect earthquake and tsunami-induced changes. Remote Sensing 8:792. 10.3390/rs8100792
57. Wilkinson S., Free M., Grant D., Boon D., Paganoni S., Mason A.. (2011). The mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake of 22 February 2011. EEFIT Reconnaissance Report. EEFIT - The Institution of Structural Engineers Available online at: https://www.istructe.org/get-involved/supported-organisations/eefit/.
58. Xu Z., Lu X., Cheng Q., Guan H., Deng L., Zhang Z., (2018). A smart phone-based system for post-earthquake investigations of building damage. Int. J. Disas. Risk Reduc. 27, 214–222. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.008
59. Yates D., Paquette S., (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 31, 6–13. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.001
60. Yau C., Sattar A., (1994). Developing expert system with soft systems concept, in Expert Systems for Development, 1994, Proceedings of International Conference (Bangkok: IEEE).
61. Zhai W., Zeng W., (2017). Building damage assessment using a single post-earthquake PolSAR image: a case of the 2010 Yushu earthquake, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 57 (Beijing: IOP Publishing). 10.1088/1755-1315/57/1/012018
62. Zhu Z., German S., Brilakis I., (2011). Visual retrieval of concrete crack properties for automated post-earthquake structural safety evaluation. Automat. Construc. 20, 874–883. 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.03.004
63. Zuccaro G., Albanese V., Cacace F., Mercuri C., Papa F., Pizza A. G.. (2008). Seismic vulnerability evaluations within the structural and functional survey activities of the COM bases in Italy, in AIP Conference Proceedings Vol. 1020 (Reggio Calabria: AIP). 10.1063/1.2963797