Earthquake management: a decision support system based on natural language processing

Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 37-45

  Fersini, E ^a   Messina, E ^a   Pozzi, F A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Decision support system; Disaster management; Earthquakes

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DISASTER PREVENTION; DISASTERS; EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

CRITICAL EVENTS; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ON-MACHINES; ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIAS; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA; USER-GENERATED CONTENT;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85010876903     PISSN: 18685137     EISSN: 18685145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-016-0373-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aha DW, Kibler D, Albert MK (1991) Instance-based learning algorithms. Mach Learn 6(1):37–66
2. Avvenuti M, Cresci S, La Polla MN, Marchetti A, Tesconi M (2014a) Earthquake emergency management by social sensing. In: Proceedings of the international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops, pp 587–592
3. Avvenuti M, Cresci S, Marchetti A, Meletti C, Tesconi M (2014b) EARS (earthquake alert and report system): a real time decision support system for earthquake crisis management. In: Proceedings of the international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 1749–1758
4. Cheng Z, Caverlee J, Lee K (2010) You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, pp 759–768
5. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297
6. Crooks A, Croitoru A, Stefanidis A, Radzikowski J (2013) Earthquake: twitter as a distributed sensor system. Trans GIS 17(1):124–147
7. Fauffman M, Kugal K (2010) Syntactic normalization of twitter messages. In: Proceedings of the international conference on natural language processing
8. Fersini E, Messina E, Pozzi FA (2014) Sentiment analysis: Bayesian ensemble learning. Decis Support Syst 68:26–38
9. Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76(5):378
10. Jennex M (2012) Managing crises and disasters with emerging technologies: advancements. IGI Global, Hershey, PA
11. Lafferty JD, McCallum A, Pereira FCN (2001) Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on machine learning, pp 282–289
12. Mahmud J, Nichols J, Drews C (2012) Where is this tweet from? inferring home locations of twitter users. In: Proceedings of the international conference on weblogs and social media, pp 511–514
13. McCallum A, Nigam K (1998) A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In: Workshop on learning for text categorization-15th national conference on artificial intelligence, pp 41–48
14. Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 3111–3119
15. Pan SJ, Yang Q (2010) A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(10):1345–1359
16. Pozzi FA, Fersini E, Messina E (2013) Bayesian model averaging and model selection for polarity classification. In: Natural language processing and information systems, pp 189–200. Springer, Berlin
17. Quinlan JR (2014) C4. 5: programs for machine learning. Elsevier, London
18. Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y (2010) Earthquake shakes twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on world wide web, pp 851–860
19. Salton G, Wong A, Yang C-S (1975) A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun ACM 18(11):613–620
20. Yin J, Lampert A, Cameron M, Robinson B, Power R (2012) Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intel Syst 6:52–59